journal article·2019-09-04Open access

Low-Temperature Solution Synthesis of Au-Modified ZnO Nanowires for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Nanosensors

Oleg Lupan, Vasile Postica, Niklas Wolff, Jun Su, Frédéric Labat, Ilaria Ciofini, Heather Cavers, Rainer Adelung, Oleksandr Polonskyi, Franz Faupel, Lorenz Kienle, Bruno Viana, Thierry Pauporté

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 35

Abstract

In this research, the low-temperature single-step electrochemical deposition of arrayed ZnO nanowires (NWs) decorated by Au nanoparticles (NPs) with diameters ranging between 10 and 100 nm is successfully demonstrated for the first time. The AuNPs and ZnO NWs were grown simultaneously in the same growth solution in consideration of the HAuCl4 concentration. Optical, structural, and chemical characterizations were analyzed in detail, proving high crystallinity of the NWs as well as the distribution of Au NPs on the surface of zinc oxide NWs demonstrated by transmission electron microscopy. Individual Au NPs-functionalized ZnO NWs (Au-NP/ZnO-NWs) were incorporated into sensor nanodevices using an focused ion bean/scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM) scientific instrument. The gas-sensing investigations demonstrated excellent selectivity to hydrogen gas at room temperature (RT) with a gas response, Igas/Iair, as high as 7.5–100 ppm for Au-NP/ZnO-NWs, possessing a AuNP surface coverage of ∼6.4%. The concentration of HAuCl4 in the electrochemical solution was observed to have no significant impact on the gas-sensing parameters in our experiments. This highlights the significant influence of the total Au/ZnO interfacial area establishing Schottky contacts for the achievement of high performances. The most significant performance of H2 response was observed for gas concentrations higher than 500 ppm of H2 in the environment, which was attributed to the surface metallization of ZnO NWs during exposure to hydrogen. For this case, an ultrahigh response of about 32.9 and 47 to 1000 and 5000 ppm of H2 was obtained, respectively. Spin-polarized periodic density functional theory calculations were realized on Au/ZnO bulk and surface-functionalized models, validating the experimental hypothesis. The combination of H2 gas detection at RT, ultralow power consumption, and reduced dimensions makes these micro-nanodevices excellent candidates for hydrogen gas leakage detection, including hydrogen gas monitoring (less than 1 ppm).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris-IRCP, Chimie ParisTech, PSL Université, rue Pierre et Marie Curie 11, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France

Functional Nano Materials, Institute for Materials Science, Faculty of Engineering, Kiel University, str. Kaiserstraße 2, D-24143 Kiel, Germany

Center for Nanotechnology and Nanosensors, Department of Microelectronics & Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Moldova, Stefan Cel Mare Av. 168, MD 2004 Chisinau, Republic of Moldova

Institute for Materials Science, Synthesis and Real Structure, Christian Albrechts University Kiel, str. Kaiserstraße 2, D-24143 Kiel, Germany

i-CLeHS, Chimie ParisTech, PSL University, rue Pierre et Marie Curie nr. 11, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France

Faculty of Engineering, Chair for Multicomponent Materials, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, str. Kaiserstraße nr. 2, D-24143 Kiel, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · China Scholarship Council · Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung · Intitute for Material Science, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aab275010.1126/science.aab2750 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.00310.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.003 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja111102u10.1021/ja111102u ↗
4. 10.1063/1.199266610.1063/1.1992666 ↗
5. 10.1021/am506499e10.1021/am506499e ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.5b0181710.1021/acsami.5b01817 ↗
7. 10.1021/am501107c10.1021/am501107c ↗
8. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/25/r0110.1088/0953-8984/16/25/r01 ↗
9. 10.1116/1.171498510.1116/1.1714985 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.106036710.1126/science.1060367 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.175907110.1063/1.1759071 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.184011610.1063/1.1840116 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl050082v10.1021/nl050082v ↗
14. 10.1002/pssr.20170032110.1002/pssr.201700321 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.10.00210.1016/j.snb.2015.10.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.01.10710.1016/j.snb.2017.01.107 ↗
17. 10.1021/jp802880c10.1021/jp802880c ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20100027810.1002/adma.201000278 ↗
19. 10.1038/srep0648310.1038/srep06483 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.04.01010.1016/j.snb.2014.04.010 ↗
21. 10.1021/jp108320j10.1021/jp108320j ↗
22. 10.1039/c5tc01024a10.1039/c5tc01024a ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.5b0149610.1021/acsami.5b01496 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.10.03210.1016/j.apsusc.2009.10.032 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.05.02210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.05.022 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp908714510.1021/jp9087145 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mejo.2007.09.00410.1016/j.mejo.2007.09.004 ↗
28. 10.1039/c6ta05347e10.1039/c6ta05347e ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20090508910.1002/anie.200905089 ↗
30. 10.3762/bjnano.6.18710.3762/bjnano.6.187 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.08910.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.089 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.02910.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.029 ↗
33. 10.1021/am405141s10.1021/am405141s ↗
34. 10.1002/1521-4095(200006)12:12<888::aid-adma888>3.0.co;2-t10.1002/1521-4095(200006)12:12<888::aid-adma888>3.0.co;2-t ↗
35. 10.1016/j.optmat.2014.03.04110.1016/j.optmat.2014.03.041 ↗
36. 10.1103/physrevb.70.11521010.1103/physrevb.70.115210 ↗
37. Morris, M. C.; McMurdie, H. F.; Evans, E. H.; Paretzkin, B.; Degrbot, J. H. Standard X-ray Diffraction Powder Patterns: Section 13-Data for 58 Substances. Interim Report National Bureau of Standards; Institute for Materials Research: Washington, DC, 1976.10.6028/NBS.MONO.25-13 ↗
38. 10.1038/nmat208310.1038/nmat2083 ↗
39. 10.1002/cphc.20170012610.1002/cphc.201700126 ↗
40. 10.1021/ja042192u10.1021/ja042192u ↗
41. Moulder J. F. · 1992
42. 10.1021/jp910263n10.1021/jp910263n ↗
43. 10.1063/1.304672610.1063/1.3046726 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.snb.2009.12.05810.1016/j.snb.2009.12.058 ↗
45. 10.1021/jp064118z10.1021/jp064118z ↗
46. 10.1039/c7cp03796a10.1039/c7cp03796a ↗
47. 10.1063/1.498984110.1063/1.4989841 ↗
48. 10.1016/0925-4005(91)80213-410.1016/0925-4005(91)80213-4 ↗
49. 10.1021/am302294v10.1021/am302294v ↗
50. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.05.03210.1016/j.snb.2019.05.032 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.12010.1016/j.snb.2018.12.120 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.158408910.1063/1.1584089 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.333988310.1063/1.3339883 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.07.11110.1016/j.snb.2012.07.111 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.06.04610.1016/j.jcis.2016.06.046 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.16310.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.163 ↗
57. 10.1002/adma.20140159710.1002/adma.201401597 ↗
58. 10.1002/adfm.20120233210.1002/adfm.201202332 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.12.09610.1016/j.snb.2012.12.096 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.00710.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.007 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.mee.2016.07.00810.1016/j.mee.2016.07.008 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.11310.1016/j.snb.2019.04.113 ↗
63. 10.1039/c5cc05370f10.1039/c5cc05370f ↗
64. 10.1021/acsami.5b0841610.1021/acsami.5b08416 ↗
65. 10.1103/physrevb.79.07340210.1103/physrevb.79.073402 ↗
66. 10.1103/physrevlett.95.26610410.1103/physrevlett.95.266104 ↗
67. 10.1063/1.298826510.1063/1.2988265 ↗
68. 10.1016/s0925-4005(00)00407-x10.1016/s0925-4005(00)00407-x ↗
69. 10.1016/s0925-4005(03)00211-910.1016/s0925-4005(03)00211-9 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.snb.2004.11.06810.1016/j.snb.2004.11.068 ↗