Softening Substrates Promote Chondrocytes Phenotype via RhoA/ROCK Pathway
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to its evascular, aneural, and alymphatic conditions, articular cartilage shows extremely poor regenerative ability. Thus, directing chondrocyte toward a desired location and function by utilizing the mechanical cues of biomaterials is a promising approach for effective tissue regeneration. However, chondrocytes cultured on Petri dish will lose their typical phenotype which may lead to compromised results. Therefore, we fabricated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) materials with various stiffness as culture substrates. Cell morphology and focal adhesion of chondrocytes displayed significant changes. The cytoskeletal tension of the adherent cells observed by average myosin IIA fluorescent intensity increased as stiffness of the underlying substrates decreased, consistent with the alteration of chondrocyte phenotype in our study. Immunofluorescent images and q-PCR results revealed that chondrocyte cultured on soft substrates showed better chondrocyte functionalization by more type II collagen and aggrecan expression, related to the lowest mRNA level of Rac-1, RhoA, ROCK-1, and ROCK-2. Taken together, this work not only points out that matrix elasticity can regulate chondrocyte functionalization via RhoA/ROCK pathway, but also provides new prospect for biomechanical control of cell behavior in cell-based cartilage regeneration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Tendon Structure and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Sichuan Province
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/00003086-200209000-0000410.1097/00003086-200209000-00004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.02710.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 ↗
3. 10.1111/cpr.1215210.1111/cpr.12152 ↗
4. 10.1038/nrm362010.1038/nrm3620 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.111699510.1126/science.1116995 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20150010510.1002/adfm.201500105 ↗
7. 10.1038/boneres.2015.2910.1038/boneres.2015.29 ↗
8. 10.1111/cpr.1215110.1111/cpr.12151 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04410.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
10. 10.1091/mbc.E12-03-017210.1091/mbc.E12-03-0172 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.a.3322610.1002/jbm.a.33226 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.00810.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.008 ↗
13. 10.1021/am504135b10.1021/am504135b ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.3285010.1002/jbm.a.32850 ↗
15. 10.1002/term.38410.1002/term.384 ↗
16. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.061410.1089/ten.tea.2009.0614 ↗
17. 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90027-710.1016/0092-8674(82)90027-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.016 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.044 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0161910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01619 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.02.03110.1016/j.yexcr.2007.02.031 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.037 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.01510.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.015 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.03110.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.031 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.08310.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.083 ↗
26. 10.1083/jcb.20060513510.1083/jcb.200605135 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.109077210.1126/science.1090772 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.09010.1016/j.cub.2008.07.090 ↗
29. 10.4161/cam.3.3.888810.4161/cam.3.3.8888 ↗
30. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-15530610.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155306 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.06.00710.1016/j.ejcb.2010.06.007 ↗
32. 10.1126/science.116291210.1126/science.1162912 ↗
33. 10.1083/jcb.20070303610.1083/jcb.200703036 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmeth.148710.1038/nmeth.1487 ↗
35. 10.1073/pnas.090326910710.1073/pnas.0903269107 ↗
36. 10.1007/BF0240614510.1007/BF02406145 ↗
37. 10.1083/jcb.150.4.F10710.1083/jcb.150.4.F107 ↗
38. 10.1038/nature0114810.1038/nature01148 ↗
39. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.15072110.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.150721 ↗
40. 10.1038/boneres.2015.1510.1038/boneres.2015.15 ↗
41. 10.1074/jbc.M40915820010.1074/jbc.M409158200 ↗
42. Daniels K. · J. Cell Sci. · 1991 · 100 · 24910.1242/jcs.100.2.249 ↗
43. 10.1042/BST033089110.1042/BST0330891 ↗
44. 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-910.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9 ↗
45. De Santis G. · Eur. Cell. Mater. · 2011 · 22 · 20210.22203/eCM.v022a16 ↗
46. 10.1115/1.157904710.1115/1.1579047 ↗
47. 10.1115/1.400093810.1115/1.4000938 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.09.00310.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.09.003 ↗
49. 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.053110.1089/ten.tea.2013.0531 ↗
50. 10.1002/term.50110.1002/term.501 ↗