journal article·2016-06-01

Seawater Pervaporation through Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Membranes: Atomistic Simulation Study

Krishna M. Gupta, Zhiwei Qiao, Kang Zhang, Jianwen Jiang

Publisher page

Abstract

An atomistic simulation study is reported for seawater pervaporation through five zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF) membranes including ZIF-8, -93, -95, -97, and -100. Salt rejection in the five ZIFs is predicted to be 100%. With the largest aperture, ZIF-100 possesses the highest water permeability of 5 × 10(-4) kg m/(m(2) h bar), which is substantially higher compared to commercial reverse osmosis membranes, as well as zeolite and graphene oxide pervaporation membranes. In ZIF-8, -93, -95, and -97 with similar aperture size, water flux is governed by framework hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity; in hydrophobic ZIF-8 and -95, water flux is higher than in hydrophilic ZIF-93 and -97. Furthermore, water molecules in ZIF-93 move slowly and remain in the membrane for a long time but undergo to-and-fro motion in ZIF-100. The lifetime of hydrogen bonds in ZIF-93 is found to be longer than in ZIF-100. This simulation study quantitatively elucidates the dynamic and structural properties of water in ZIF membranes, identifies the key governing factors (aperture size and framework hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity), and suggests that ZIF-100 is an intriguing membrane for seawater pervaporation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Membrane Separation Technologies · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117576, Singapore

Funding

Agency for Science, Technology and Research

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/452260a10.1038/452260a ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0659910.1038/nature06599 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.313.5790.108810.1126/science.313.5790.1088 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.120048810.1126/science.1200488 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.06710.1016/j.desal.2007.01.067 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.coche.2014.01.00510.1016/j.coche.2014.01.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.03810.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.038 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.02910.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.029 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.02610.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.026 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.04910.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.049 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.02110.1016/j.desal.2014.05.021 ↗
12. 10.1039/C4TA06573E10.1039/C4TA06573E ↗
13. 10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.02610.1016/j.desal.2013.12.026 ↗
14. 10.1039/C4CS00423J10.1039/C4CS00423J ↗
15. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
16. 10.1039/b802426j10.1039/b802426j ↗
17. 10.1021/ie800666s10.1021/ie800666s ↗
18. 10.1039/c0cs00128g10.1039/c0cs00128g ↗
19. 10.1021/cr200274s10.1021/cr200274s ↗
20. 10.1021/cr200327210.1021/cr2003272 ↗
21. 10.1021/cr200217c10.1021/cr200217c ↗
22. 10.1021/cr400005f10.1021/cr400005f ↗
23. 10.1063/1.357390210.1063/1.3573902 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.03810.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.038 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0359310.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03593 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.00510.1016/j.desal.2016.02.005 ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.060243910310.1073/pnas.0602439103 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja104035j10.1021/ja104035j ↗
29. 10.1038/nature0690010.1038/nature06900 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.fluid.2007.07.04210.1016/j.fluid.2007.07.042 ↗
33. 10.1021/la800369s10.1021/la800369s ↗
34. 10.1021/jp802343n10.1021/jp802343n ↗
35. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A.Gaussian 09, revision D.01 ed.Gaussian, Inc.:Wallingford, CT, 2009.
36. 10.1063/1.44586910.1063/1.445869 ↗
37. 10.1021/ja00124a00210.1021/ja00124a002 ↗
38. 10.1038/3510253510.1038/35102535 ↗
39. 10.1002/jcc.2029110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
40. 10.1039/c4cp00739e10.1039/c4cp00739e ↗
41. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.02010.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.020 ↗
42. 10.1039/c0ee00541j10.1039/c0ee00541j ↗
43. 10.1039/C3NR04984A10.1039/C3NR04984A ↗
44. 10.1021/nl301285310.1021/nl3012853 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.03.00310.1016/j.ces.2016.03.003 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.5b0227610.1021/jacs.5b02276 ↗
47. 10.1038/379055a010.1038/379055a0 ↗
48. 10.1021/jp012749h10.1021/jp012749h ↗
49. 10.1021/jz100240r10.1021/jz100240r ↗