Seawater Pervaporation through Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Membranes: Atomistic Simulation Study
Source abstract
Abstract
An atomistic simulation study is reported for seawater pervaporation through five zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF) membranes including ZIF-8, -93, -95, -97, and -100. Salt rejection in the five ZIFs is predicted to be 100%. With the largest aperture, ZIF-100 possesses the highest water permeability of 5 × 10(-4) kg m/(m(2) h bar), which is substantially higher compared to commercial reverse osmosis membranes, as well as zeolite and graphene oxide pervaporation membranes. In ZIF-8, -93, -95, and -97 with similar aperture size, water flux is governed by framework hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity; in hydrophobic ZIF-8 and -95, water flux is higher than in hydrophilic ZIF-93 and -97. Furthermore, water molecules in ZIF-93 move slowly and remain in the membrane for a long time but undergo to-and-fro motion in ZIF-100. The lifetime of hydrogen bonds in ZIF-93 is found to be longer than in ZIF-100. This simulation study quantitatively elucidates the dynamic and structural properties of water in ZIF membranes, identifies the key governing factors (aperture size and framework hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity), and suggests that ZIF-100 is an intriguing membrane for seawater pervaporation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Membrane Separation Technologies · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117576, Singapore
Funding
Agency for Science, Technology and Research
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/452260a10.1038/452260a ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0659910.1038/nature06599 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.313.5790.108810.1126/science.313.5790.1088 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.120048810.1126/science.1200488 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.06710.1016/j.desal.2007.01.067 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.coche.2014.01.00510.1016/j.coche.2014.01.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.03810.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.038 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.02910.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.029 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.02610.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.026 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.04910.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.049 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.02110.1016/j.desal.2014.05.021 ↗
12. 10.1039/C4TA06573E10.1039/C4TA06573E ↗
13. 10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.02610.1016/j.desal.2013.12.026 ↗
14. 10.1039/C4CS00423J10.1039/C4CS00423J ↗
15. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
16. 10.1039/b802426j10.1039/b802426j ↗
17. 10.1021/ie800666s10.1021/ie800666s ↗
18. 10.1039/c0cs00128g10.1039/c0cs00128g ↗
19. 10.1021/cr200274s10.1021/cr200274s ↗
20. 10.1021/cr200327210.1021/cr2003272 ↗
21. 10.1021/cr200217c10.1021/cr200217c ↗
22. 10.1021/cr400005f10.1021/cr400005f ↗
23. 10.1063/1.357390210.1063/1.3573902 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.03810.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.038 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0359310.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03593 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.00510.1016/j.desal.2016.02.005 ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.060243910310.1073/pnas.0602439103 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja104035j10.1021/ja104035j ↗
29. 10.1038/nature0690010.1038/nature06900 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.fluid.2007.07.04210.1016/j.fluid.2007.07.042 ↗
33. 10.1021/la800369s10.1021/la800369s ↗
34. 10.1021/jp802343n10.1021/jp802343n ↗
35. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A.Gaussian 09, revision D.01 ed.Gaussian, Inc.:Wallingford, CT, 2009.
36. 10.1063/1.44586910.1063/1.445869 ↗
37. 10.1021/ja00124a00210.1021/ja00124a002 ↗
38. 10.1038/3510253510.1038/35102535 ↗
39. 10.1002/jcc.2029110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
40. 10.1039/c4cp00739e10.1039/c4cp00739e ↗
41. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.02010.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.020 ↗
42. 10.1039/c0ee00541j10.1039/c0ee00541j ↗
43. 10.1039/C3NR04984A10.1039/C3NR04984A ↗
44. 10.1021/nl301285310.1021/nl3012853 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.03.00310.1016/j.ces.2016.03.003 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.5b0227610.1021/jacs.5b02276 ↗
47. 10.1038/379055a010.1038/379055a0 ↗
48. 10.1021/jp012749h10.1021/jp012749h ↗
49. 10.1021/jz100240r10.1021/jz100240r ↗