Ultrathin, Ultrasmooth Gold Layer on Dielectrics without the Use of Additional Metallic Adhesion Layers
Source abstract
Abstract
With advances in the plasmonics and metamaterials research field, it has become more and more important to fabricate thin and smooth Au metal films in a reliable way. Here, by thin films we mean that their average height is below 10 nm and their average roughness is below 5% of the total thickness. In this article, we investigated the use of amino- and mercaptosilanes to increase the adhesion of Au on Si wafers, thus obtaining a smooth and thin layer. This method does not include the use of other metals to improve the adhesion of gold, like Ti or Cr, since they would reduce the optical characteristics of the structure. Our results show that layers having 6 nm thickness and below 0.3 nm roughness can be reproducibly obtained using aminosilanes. Layers having a nominal thickness of 5 nm have a yield of 58%; thus, this thickness is the limit for the process that we investigated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photonic Crystals and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Photonics Engineering and ‡Technical University of Denmark, Oersteds Plads, Building 345v, Room 178, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Formica N. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 304810.1021/am303147w ↗
2. Smith D. R. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 418410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184 ↗
3. Fang N. · Science · 2005 · 308 · 53410.1126/science.1108759 ↗
4. Park J. H. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 398810.1002/adma.201200812 ↗
5. Kidwai O. · Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. · 2012 · 85 · 05384210.1103/PhysRevA.85.053842 ↗
6. Nagpal P. · Science · 2009 · 325 · 59410.1126/science.1174655 ↗
7. Sarid D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1981 · 47 · 192710.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1927 ↗
8. Hammiche A. · Vacuum · 1994 · 45 · 56910.1016/0042-207X(94)90254-2 ↗
9. Malinský P. · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2012 · 7 · 24110.1186/1556-276X-7-241 ↗
10. Habteyes T. G. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 570210.1021/nn301885u ↗
11. Gentle T. · J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. · 1992 · 6 · 30710.1163/156856192X00359 ↗
12. Polniaszek M. · Adhes. Age · 1968 · 11 · 25
13. Doron A. · Langmuir · 1995 · 11 · 131310.1021/la00004a044 ↗
14. Petri D. · Langmuir · 1999 · 15 · 452010.1021/la981379u ↗
15. Ulman A. · Chem. Rev. · 1996 · 96 · 153310.1021/cr9502357 ↗
16. Madsen H. B. · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 2010 · 1798 · 177910.1016/j.bbamem.2010.06.006 ↗
17. Howarter J. A. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 1114210.1021/la061240g ↗
18. Williams R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1974 · 25 · 53110.1063/1.1655297 ↗
19. Moon J. H. · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 462110.1021/la9604339 ↗
20. Gordon J. A. · Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 262210.1364/OE.15.002622 ↗
21. Serway R. · 2005
22. Schwartzkopf M. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 505310.1039/c3nr34216f ↗
23. Yu S. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 317010.1021/jz401585d ↗
24. Kaune G. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 35310.1021/am8000727 ↗
25. Roth S. V. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 21910–1
26. Scarpettini A. F. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1594810.1021/la102937b ↗
27. Yang J. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 757910.1021/la301042y ↗
28. Yamashiro K. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 248010.1021/jp306290w ↗
29. Chen C.-F. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 781910.1021/la060656r ↗