journal article·2020-12-09Open access

KN95 and N95 Respirators Retain Filtration Efficiency despite a Loss of Dipole Charge during Decontamination

Wonjun Yim, Diyi Cheng, Shiv H. Patel, Rui Kou, Ying Shirley Meng, Jesse V. Jokerst

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 49

Abstract

N95 decontamination protocols and KN95 respirators have been described as solutions to a lack of personal protective equipment. However, there are a few material science studies that characterize the charge distribution and physical changes accompanying disinfection treatments, particularly heating. Here, we report the filtration efficiency, dipole charge density, and fiber integrity of N95 and KN95 respirators before and after various decontamination methods. We found that the filter layers in N95 and KN95 respirators maintained their fiber integrity without any deformations during disinfection. The filter layers of N95 respirators were 8-fold thicker and had 2-fold higher dipole charge density than that of KN95 respirators. Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)-approved KN95 respirators showed filtration efficiencies as high as N95 respirators. Interestingly, although there was a significant drop in the dipole charge in both respirators during decontamination, there was no remarkable decrease in the filtration efficiencies due to mechanical filtration. Cotton and polyester face masks had a lower filtration efficiency and lower dipole charge. In conclusion, a loss of electrostatic charge does not directly correlate to the decreased performance of either respirator.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infection Control and Ventilation · Burn Injury Management and Outcomes · Infection Control in Healthcare

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30195-X10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30195-X ↗
2. 10.1126/science.abb276210.1126/science.abb2762 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11845-020-02218-210.1007/s11845-020-02218-2 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.abc619710.1126/science.abc6197 ↗
5. 10.3390/jcm909300210.3390/jcm9093002 ↗
6. 10.1080/1542811989101038910.1080/15428119891010389 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0325210.1021/acsnano.0c03252 ↗
8. 10.5923/j.clothing.20180501.0110.5923/j.clothing.20180501.01 ↗
9. 10.15406/jteft.2019.05.0018510.15406/jteft.2019.05.00185 ↗
10. 10.3390/qubs304002010.3390/qubs3040020 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7RA07694K10.1039/C7RA07694K ↗
12. Dutton, K. C. Overview and Analysis of the Meltblown Process and Parameters J. Text. Appar. Technol. Manag. 2009, 6, 1–24.
13. Mukhopadhyay A. · 2014 · 16410.1533/9780857097750.164 ↗
14. 10.1177/1558925003os-120011310.1177/1558925003os-1200113 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0032-5910(01)00307-210.1016/S0032-5910(01)00307-2 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1009095910.3390/polym10090959 ↗
17. 10.1109/TDEI.2010.553966910.1109/TDEI.2010.5539669 ↗
18. 10.1002/1098-2329(200024)19:4<312::AID-ADV7>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/1098-2329(200024)19:4<312::AID-ADV7>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
19. Brown R. C. · 1993
20. 10.1056/nejmp200614110.1056/nejmp2006141 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.04.02010.1016/j.ajic.2020.04.020 ↗
22. 10.3201/eid2609.20152410.3201/eid2609.201524 ↗
23. 10.1039/D0NR03047C10.1039/D0NR03047C ↗
24. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0124510.1021/acsphotonics.0c01245 ↗
25. Sandle T. · 2018
26. US Food and Drug Administration. Final Report for the Bioquell Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor (HPV) Decontamination for Reuse of N95 Respirators ; White Oak, MD: FDA, 2016.
27. 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.02610.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.026 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0359710.1021/acsnano.0c03597 ↗
29. 10.1371/journal.pone.023485110.1371/journal.pone.0234851 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.03610.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.036 ↗
31. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1209910.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12099 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.04.00910.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.04.009 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0397210.1021/acsnano.0c03972 ↗
34. Wakelyn P. J. · 200610.1201/9781420045888 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0221110.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02211 ↗
36. 10.1080/0278682820895858410.1080/02786828208958584 ↗
37. 10.1002/mame.20160035310.1002/mame.201600353 ↗
38. 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30095-110.1016/S2666-5247(20)30095-1 ↗
39. 10.2486/indhealth.48.29610.2486/indhealth.48.296 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11051-005-9017-x10.1007/s11051-005-9017-x ↗
41. 10.1080/02786826.2013.82920910.1080/02786826.2013.829209 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.10.00510.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.10.005 ↗
43. 10.1080/0278682930895963810.1080/02786829308959638 ↗
44. 10.1088/0022-3727/27/6/02910.1088/0022-3727/27/6/029 ↗
45. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/2/02530610.1088/0022-3727/41/2/025306 ↗
46. 10.1088/0022-3727/39/7/01410.1088/0022-3727/39/7/014 ↗
47. 10.1002/adma.20180240510.1002/adma.201802405 ↗
48. 10.1109/66.33028110.1109/66.330281 ↗
49. Planning, P. Recommended Guidance for Extended Use and Limited Reuse of N95 FilteringFacepiece Respirators in Healthcare Settings ; US Government, 2020.
50. 10.1080/1545962050039166810.1080/15459620500391668 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.10483010.1016/j.ssci.2020.104830 ↗
52. Rasband, W. ImageJ ; US National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, Maryland, 1997.
53. Model 8095 N95–Companion to the PortaCount Plus. Operation and Service Manual ; TSI Inc. Shoreview: Minnesota, 2005.
54. 10.1177/10913505000050010510.1177/109135050000500105 ↗
55. PORTACOUNT Plus Model 8020 Operation and Service Manual ; TSI, Inc.: Minnesota, 2006.
56. 10.1371/journal.pone.000261810.1371/journal.pone.0002618 ↗
57. 10.1080/15459624.2016.122515710.1080/15459624.2016.1225157 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.10573010.1016/j.envint.2020.105730 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.11.00210.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.11.002 ↗
60. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab325f10.1088/1361-6463/ab325f ↗
61. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/22/03310.1088/0022-3727/40/22/033 ↗
62. Xu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Chen, G. In Measurement and Analysis of Electric Potential Decay in Corona Charged Low-Density Polyethylene Films , 2007 IEEE International Conference on Solid Dielectrics, IEEE, 2007; pp 454–457.10.1109/ICSD.2007.4290849 ↗