journal article·2022-02-09Open access

Slippery Liquid-Like Solid Surfaces with Promising Antibiofilm Performance under Both Static and Flow Conditions

Yufeng Zhu, Glen McHale, Jack Dawson, Steven Armstrong, Gary Wells, Rui Han, Hongzhong Liu, Waldemar Vollmer, Paul Stoodley, Nicholas Jakubovics, Jinju Chen

Abstract

Biofilms are central to some of the most urgent global challenges across diverse fields of application, from medicine to industries to the environment, and exert considerable economic and social impact. A fundamental assumption in anti-biofilms has been that the coating on a substrate surface is solid. The invention of slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces─a continuously wet lubricating coating retained on a solid surface by capillary forces─has led to this being challenged. However, in situations where flow occurs, shear stress may deplete the lubricant and affect the anti-biofilm performance. Here, we report on the use of slippery omniphobic covalently attached liquid (SOCAL) surfaces, which provide a surface coating with short (ca. 4 nm) non-cross-linked polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chains retaining liquid-surface properties, as an antibiofilm strategy stable under shear stress from flow. This surface reduced biofilm formation of the key biofilm-forming pathogens Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by three-four orders of magnitude compared to the widely used medical implant material PDMS after 7 days under static and dynamic culture conditions. Throughout the entire dynamic culture period of P. aeruginosa, SOCAL significantly outperformed a typical antibiofilm slippery surface [i.e., swollen PDMS in silicone oil (S-PDMS)]. We have revealed that significant oil loss occurred after 2-7 day flow for S-PDMS, which correlated to increased contact angle hysteresis (CAH), indicating a degradation of the slippery surface properties, and biofilm formation, while SOCAL has stable CAH and sustainable antibiofilm performance after 7 day flow. The significance of this correlation is to provide a useful easy-to-measure physical parameter as an indicator for long-term antibiofilm performance. This biofilm-resistant liquid-like solid surface offers a new antibiofilm strategy for applications in medical devices and other areas where biofilm development is problematic.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K.

School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FB, U.K.

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710054, China

Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, U.K.

Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity and the Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States

National Centre for Advanced Tribology at Southampton (nCATS), National Biofilm Innovation Centre (NBIC), Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton S017 1BJ, U.K.

School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, U.K.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Royal Society · China Scholarship Council

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.2.4696610.12968/jowc.2010.19.2.46966 ↗
2. 10.1080/08927014.2011.59326110.1080/08927014.2011.593261 ↗
3. 10.1002/mabi.20180038410.1002/mabi.201800384 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.idc.2018.06.00210.1016/j.idc.2018.06.002 ↗
5. 10.1097/nan.0b013e3182285e4310.1097/nan.0b013e3182285e43 ↗
6. 10.1021/am401532z10.1021/am401532z ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-018-19484-x10.1038/s41598-018-19484-x ↗
8. 10.1038/srep0712210.1038/srep07122 ↗
9. 10.1038/srep1681710.1038/srep16817 ↗
10. 10.1021/la104607g10.1021/la104607g ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20120052810.1002/smll.201200528 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.041 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.05810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.058 ↗
14. 10.1039/c6ta06481g10.1039/c6ta06481g ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20180272410.1002/adma.201802724 ↗
16. 10.1080/08927014.2012.69442610.1080/08927014.2012.694426 ↗
17. 10.1021/la201002410.1021/la2010024 ↗
18. 10.1155/2011/17892110.1155/2011/178921 ↗
19. 10.1073/pnas.121966211010.1073/pnas.1219662110 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0236710.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02367 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20100121510.1002/adma.201001215 ↗
22. 10.1039/d0mh00088d10.1039/d0mh00088d ↗
23. 10.1209/0295-5075/96/5600110.1209/0295-5075/96/56001 ↗
24. 10.1038/nature1044710.1038/nature10447 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0327610.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03276 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.6b0987910.1021/acsami.6b09879 ↗
27. 10.1116/1.503951410.1116/1.5039514 ↗
28. 10.1073/pnas.120197310910.1073/pnas.1201973109 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11828910.1016/j.memsci.2020.118289 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.06710.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.067 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.06.01210.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.06.012 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b0006510.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00065 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0013410.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00134 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.7b1473610.1021/acsami.7b14736 ↗
35. 10.1002/admi.20170055210.1002/admi.201700552 ↗
36. 10.1039/c7tb02457f10.1039/c7tb02457f ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0041110.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00411 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.8b1176810.1021/acsami.8b11768 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.9b1018410.1021/acsnano.9b10184 ↗
40. 10.1021/cm504652g10.1021/cm504652g ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20150938510.1002/anie.201509385 ↗
42. 10.1021/la105068c10.1021/la105068c ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0384910.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03849 ↗
44. 10.1116/11.2005090810.1116/11.20050908 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.00710.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.007 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0413610.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04136 ↗
47. 10.1039/c6sm00920d10.1039/c6sm00920d ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0266810.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02668 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.03210.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.032 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41522-017-0018-110.1038/s41522-017-0018-1 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0698510.1021/acsnano.6b06985 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.009 ↗
53. 10.1021/ab500057810.1021/ab5000578 ↗
54. 10.1002/adhm.20160094810.1002/adhm.201600948 ↗
55. 10.1002/jbm.b.3323010.1002/jbm.b.33230 ↗
56. 10.1097/00005392-199811000-0008210.1097/00005392-199811000-00082 ↗
57. 10.1098/rsif.2019.088410.1098/rsif.2019.0884 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41579-018-0057-510.1038/s41579-018-0057-5 ↗
59. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07909.x10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07909.x ↗
60. 10.1103/physrevapplied.3.04401910.1103/physrevapplied.3.044019 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z ↗
62. 10.1128/aem.69.10.6280-6287.200310.1128/aem.69.10.6280-6287.2003 ↗
63. 10.1016/0956-9618(94)80024-310.1016/0956-9618(94)80024-3 ↗
64. 10.1371/journal.pone.005533910.1371/journal.pone.0055339 ↗
65. 10.1128/jb.00410-1510.1128/jb.00410-15 ↗