Systematic Investigation of Iridium-Based Bimetallic Thin Film Catalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Media
Source abstract
Abstract
Multimetallic Ir-based systems offer significant opportunities for enhanced oxygen evolution electrocatalysis by modifying the electronic and geometric properties of the active catalyst. Herein, a systematic investigation of bimetallic Ir-based thin films was performed to identify activity and stability trends across material systems for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in acidic media. Electron beam evaporation was used to co-deposit metallic films of Ir, IrSn2, IrCr, IrTi, and IrNi. The electrocatalytic activity of the electrochemically oxidized alloys was found to increase in the following order: IrTi < IrSn2 < Ir ∼ IrNi < IrCr. The IrCr system demonstrates two times the catalytic activity of Ir at 1.65 V versus RHE. Density functional theory calculations suggest that this enhancement is due to Cr active sites that have improved oxygen binding energetics compared to those of pure Ir oxide. This work identifies IrCr as a promising new catalyst system that facilitates reduced precious metal loadings for acid-based OER catalysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States
Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences · Toyota Research Institute
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20130658810.1002/anie.201306588 ↗
2. 10.1039/C4CY00669K10.1039/C4CY00669K ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20160127510.1002/aenm.201601275 ↗
4. Simbolotti G. · IEA Energy Technology Essentials · 2007 · 3
5. 10.1016/s0360-0564(02)47006-X10.1016/s0360-0564(02)47006-X ↗
6. Annual Merit Review. H2 at Scale: Deeply Decarbonizing Our Energy System. Technical Report; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2016.
7. 10.1021/ja510442p10.1021/ja510442p ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.12510.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.125 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.15110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solener.2006.10.00510.1016/j.solener.2006.10.005 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.368479810.1149/1.3684798 ↗
12. 10.1002/cctc.20100039710.1002/cctc.201000397 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.04.01310.1016/j.coelec.2018.04.013 ↗
14. 10.1038/nchem.200110.1038/nchem.2001 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl401881z10.1021/nl401881z ↗
16. 10.1038/nchem.36710.1038/nchem.367 ↗
17. 10.1039/c2ee03590a10.1039/c2ee03590a ↗
18. 10.1126/science.aad889210.1126/science.aad8892 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.aaa876510.1126/science.aaa8765 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.15680110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.156801 ↗
21. 10.1039/C7EE02626A10.1039/C7EE02626A ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.12310.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.123 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.07610.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.076 ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20141107210.1002/anie.201411072 ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.5b0778810.1021/jacs.5b07788 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20170088610.1002/adfm.201700886 ↗
27. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0378710.1021/acscatal.7b03787 ↗
28. 10.1039/C7TA08982A10.1039/C7TA08982A ↗
29. 10.1039/C6RA27354H10.1039/C6RA27354H ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1216410.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12164 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.aaf505010.1126/science.aaf5050 ↗
32. 10.1021/jp013547o10.1021/jp013547o ↗
33. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0324610.1021/acscatal.6b03246 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmat304710.1038/nmat3047 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.09.00710.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.09.007 ↗
36. 10.1038/ncomms1236310.1038/ncomms12363 ↗
37. 10.1149/2.0071611jes10.1149/2.0071611jes ↗
38. 10.1039/C4SC01065E10.1039/C4SC01065E ↗
39. 10.1039/C5CP06997A10.1039/C5CP06997A ↗
40. 10.1002/sia.589510.1002/sia.5895 ↗
41. 10.1016/0039-6028(95)00336-310.1016/0039-6028(95)00336-3 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0022-4596(76)80012-610.1016/S0022-4596(76)80012-6 ↗
43. 10.1016/0169-4332(89)90977-X10.1016/0169-4332(89)90977-X ↗
44. 10.1021/jacs.7b0807110.1021/jacs.7b08071 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.08.01410.1016/j.cattod.2015.08.014 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.10.00510.1016/j.cattod.2015.10.005 ↗
47. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/04/04520210.1088/0953-8984/20/04/045202 ↗
48. 10.1002/cctc.20110016010.1002/cctc.201100160 ↗
49. 10.1021/jp310667r10.1021/jp310667r ↗
50. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.10110.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.101 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41467-018-08144-310.1038/s41467-018-08144-3 ↗
52. 10.1021/jz500610u10.1021/jz500610u ↗
53. 10.1021/jz201650710.1021/jz2016507 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.11.00810.1016/j.jelechem.2006.11.008 ↗
55. 10.1021/jp047349j10.1021/jp047349j ↗
56. 10.1021/ja511559d10.1021/ja511559d ↗
57. 10.1021/ja405997s10.1021/ja405997s ↗
58. 10.1021/jacs.7b0262210.1021/jacs.7b02622 ↗
59. Computational Data. https://www.catalysis-hub.org/publications/StricklerSystematic2019 (accessed August 22, 2019).
60. 10.1038/s41597-019-0081-y10.1038/s41597-019-0081-y ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.11.05810.1016/j.jelechem.2018.11.058 ↗
62. 10.1002/cctc.20190084610.1002/cctc.201900846 ↗