journal article·2017-10-25Open access

Highly Stable Molybdenum Disulfide Protected Silicon Photocathodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Laurie A. King, Thomas R. Hellstern, Joonsuk Park, Robert Sinclair, Thomas F. Jaramillo

Abstract

Developing materials, interfaces, and devices with improved stability remains one of the key challenges in the field of photoelectrochemical water splitting. As a barrier to corrosion, molybdenum disulfide is a particularly attractive protection layer for photocathodes due to its inherent stability in acid, the low permeability of its basal planes, and the excellent hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity the MoS 2 edge. Here, we demonstrate a stable silicon photocathode containing a protecting layer consisting of molybdenum disulfide, molybdenum silicide, and silicon oxide which operates continuously for two months. We make comparisons between this system and another molybdenum sulfide–silicon photocathode embodiment, taking both systems to catastrophic failure during photoelectrochemical stability measurements and exploring mechanisms of degradation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy provide key insights into the origins of stability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Shriram Center, Stanford University, 443 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 496 Lomita Mall, Stanford, California 94305, United States

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5EE02573G10.1039/C5EE02573G ↗
2. 10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
3. 10.1021/cm402151810.1021/cm4021518 ↗
4. 10.1002/cssc.20130103010.1002/cssc.201301030 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0597610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05976 ↗
6. 10.1038/300733a010.1038/300733a0 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.80.4.115210.1073/pnas.80.4.1152 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp980679h10.1021/jp980679h ↗
9. 10.1016/0360-3199(96)00023-710.1016/0360-3199(96)00023-7 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat301710.1038/nmat3017 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat362610.1038/nmat3626 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat445110.1038/nmat4451 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat441010.1038/nmat4410 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20150175810.1002/aenm.201501758 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20140073910.1002/aenm.201400739 ↗
16. 10.1039/c3cp52890a10.1039/c3cp52890a ↗
17. 10.1021/cs500923c10.1021/cs500923c ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0056310.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00563 ↗
19. 10.1016/0169-4332(92)90106-810.1016/0169-4332(92)90106-8 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.210875910.1149/1.2108759 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.02810.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.028 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.114148310.1126/science.1141483 ↗
23. 10.1016/0021-9517(75)90022-610.1016/0021-9517(75)90022-6 ↗
24. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Capacity Factors for Utility Scale Generators Not Primarily Using Fossil Fuels; 2008.
25. Helms C. R. · 1988 · 8510.1007/978-1-4899-0774-5 ↗