Highly Stable Molybdenum Disulfide Protected Silicon Photocathodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting
Source abstract
Abstract
Developing materials, interfaces, and devices with improved stability remains one of the key challenges in the field of photoelectrochemical water splitting. As a barrier to corrosion, molybdenum disulfide is a particularly attractive protection layer for photocathodes due to its inherent stability in acid, the low permeability of its basal planes, and the excellent hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity the MoS 2 edge. Here, we demonstrate a stable silicon photocathode containing a protecting layer consisting of molybdenum disulfide, molybdenum silicide, and silicon oxide which operates continuously for two months. We make comparisons between this system and another molybdenum sulfide–silicon photocathode embodiment, taking both systems to catastrophic failure during photoelectrochemical stability measurements and exploring mechanisms of degradation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy provide key insights into the origins of stability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Shriram Center, Stanford University, 443 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 496 Lomita Mall, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Funding
Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5EE02573G10.1039/C5EE02573G ↗
2. 10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
3. 10.1021/cm402151810.1021/cm4021518 ↗
4. 10.1002/cssc.20130103010.1002/cssc.201301030 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0597610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05976 ↗
6. 10.1038/300733a010.1038/300733a0 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.80.4.115210.1073/pnas.80.4.1152 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp980679h10.1021/jp980679h ↗
9. 10.1016/0360-3199(96)00023-710.1016/0360-3199(96)00023-7 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat301710.1038/nmat3017 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat362610.1038/nmat3626 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat445110.1038/nmat4451 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat441010.1038/nmat4410 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20150175810.1002/aenm.201501758 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20140073910.1002/aenm.201400739 ↗
16. 10.1039/c3cp52890a10.1039/c3cp52890a ↗
17. 10.1021/cs500923c10.1021/cs500923c ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0056310.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00563 ↗
19. 10.1016/0169-4332(92)90106-810.1016/0169-4332(92)90106-8 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.210875910.1149/1.2108759 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.02810.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.028 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.114148310.1126/science.1141483 ↗
23. 10.1016/0021-9517(75)90022-610.1016/0021-9517(75)90022-6 ↗
24. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Capacity Factors for Utility Scale Generators Not Primarily Using Fossil Fuels; 2008.
25. Helms C. R. · 1988 · 8510.1007/978-1-4899-0774-5 ↗