journal article·2022-01-26

Development of Cellulose Nanofibril/Casein-Based 3D Composite Hemostasis Scaffold for Potential Wound-Healing Application

Santosh Shivaji Biranje, Jianzhong Sun, Lu Cheng, Yu Cheng, Yifei Shi, Sujie Yu, Haixin Jiao, Meng Zhang, Xuechu Lu, Wenjia Han, Qianqian Wang, Zhen Zhang, Jun Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

Excessive bleeding in traumatic hemorrhage is the primary concern for natural wound healing and the main reason for trauma deaths. The three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of bioinks offers the desired structural complexity vital for hemostasis activity and targeted cell proliferation in rapid and controlled wound healing. However, it is challenging to develop suitable bioinks to fabricate specific 3D scaffolds desirable in wound healing. In this work, a 3D composite scaffold is designed using bioprinting technology and synergistic hemostasis mechanisms of cellulose nanofibrils (TCNFs), chitosan, and casein to control blood loss in traumatic hemorrhage. Bioinks that consist of casein bioconjugated TCNF (with a casein content of 104.5 ± 34.1 mg/g) using the carbodiimide cross-linker chemistry were subjected to bioprinting for customizable 3D scaffold fabrication. Further, the 3D composite scaffolds were in situ cross-linked using a green ionic complexation approach. The covalent conjugation among TCNF, casein, and chitosan was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies. The in vitro hemostasis activity of the 3D composite scaffold was analyzed by a human thrombin–antithrombin (TAT) assay and adsorption of red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets. The 3D composite scaffold had a better swelling behavior and a faster whole blood clotting rate at each time point than the 3D TCNF scaffold and commercial cellulose-based dressings. The TAT assay demonstrated that the 3D composite scaffold could form a higher content of thrombin (663.29 pg/mL) and stable blood clot compared to a cellulosic pad (580.35 pg/mL), 3D TCNF (457.78 pg/mL), and cellulosic gauze (328.92 pg/mL), which are essential for faster blood coagulation. In addition, the 3D composite scaffold had a lower blood clotting index (23.34%) than the 3D TCNF scaffold (41.93%), suggesting higher efficiencies for RBC entrapping to induce blood clotting. The in vivo cytocompatibility was evaluated by a 3D cell culture study, and results showed that the 3D composite scaffold could promote growth and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells, which is vital for wound healing. Cellulase-based in vitro deconstruction of the 3D composite scaffold showed significant weight loss (80 ± 5%) compared to the lysozyme hydrolysis (22 ± 5%) after 28 days of incubation, suggesting the biodegradation potential of the composite scaffold. In conclusion, this study proposes efficient prospects to develop a 3D composite scaffold from bioprinting of TCNF-based bioinks that can accelerate blood clotting and wound healing, suggesting its potential application in reducing blood loss during traumatic hemorrhage.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hemostasis and retained surgical items · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Wound Healing and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Biofuels Institute, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, China

Reproduction Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, 438 Jiefang Road, Zhenjiang 212001, China

Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Science & Technology of Ministry of Education, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China

SCNU-TUE Joint Lab of Device Integrated Responsive Materials (DIRM), National Center for International Research on Green Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China

ScienceK Ltd., Huzhou 313000, China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · Jiangsu University · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Treatment Technology and Materials · Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions · Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Science and Technology, Qilu University of Technology

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10118-015-1580-810.1007/s10118-015-1580-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.00810.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.25810.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.258 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.08.02210.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.08.022 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.6b1231710.1021/acsami.6b12317 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.9b1773210.1021/acsami.9b17732 ↗
7. 10.1177/088532821143248710.1177/0885328211432487 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.01710.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.017 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.9b0461510.1021/acsami.9b04615 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.04510.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.045 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.00110.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.001 ↗
12. 10.1039/c7bm00554g10.1039/c7bm00554g ↗
13. 10.5812/traumamon.2602310.5812/traumamon.26023 ↗
14. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c3bcca10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c3bcca ↗
15. 10.1007/s10934-018-0602-710.1007/s10934-018-0602-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11610610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116106 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.06410.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.064 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.07710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.077 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10570-016-1038-310.1007/s10570-016-1038-3 ↗
20. 10.1177/15589250130080040210.1177/155892501300800402 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10570-021-04176-z10.1007/s10570-021-04176-z ↗
22. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.06.00110.1016/j.idairyj.2009.06.001 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.7b0275610.1021/acsami.7b02756 ↗
24. 10.1080/15685551.2014.90762110.1080/15685551.2014.907621 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.07710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.077 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.03.00310.1016/j.mattod.2020.03.003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.06510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.065 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.043 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10570-011-9578-z10.1007/s10570-011-9578-z ↗
31. 10.1039/c5ra16183e10.1039/c5ra16183e ↗
32. 10.1021/bm101106c10.1021/bm101106c ↗
33. 10.1038/s41598-018-37848-110.1038/s41598-018-37848-1 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.09410.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.094 ↗
35. 10.1039/c5nr05511c10.1039/c5nr05511c ↗
36. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.04010.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.040 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10570-018-1683-910.1007/s10570-018-1683-9 ↗
38. 10.1039/c5ra22548e10.1039/c5ra22548e ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.11956010.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119560 ↗
40. 10.1186/1754-6834-3-1010.1186/1754-6834-3-10 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carres.2005.05.00510.1016/j.carres.2005.05.005 ↗
42. 10.3390/nano202018710.3390/nano2020187 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.14810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.148 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.00110.1016/j.msec.2016.01.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.010 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0110810.1021/acsabm.0c01108 ↗
47. 10.1002/mabi.20200010610.1002/mabi.202000106 ↗
48. 10.1039/c7ta02467c10.1039/c7ta02467c ↗
49. 10.1039/c7nr08966j10.1039/c7nr08966j ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.02610.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.026 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.06410.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.064 ↗
52. 10.1002/jbm.a.3471010.1002/jbm.a.34710 ↗
53. 10.3390/bioengineering702004010.3390/bioengineering7020040 ↗
54. 10.1088/1748-6041/7/4/04500110.1088/1748-6041/7/4/045001 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.06610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.066 ↗
56. 10.1002/jbm.a.3314810.1002/jbm.a.33148 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.08510.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.085 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.27610.1016/j.msec.2017.03.276 ↗
59. 10.1007/s10856-013-4864-y10.1007/s10856-013-4864-y ↗
60. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.27610.1016/j.msec.2017.03.276 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.13110.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.131 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.034 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsami.7b0776910.1021/acsami.7b07769 ↗
64. 10.1039/c6ra15983d10.1039/c6ra15983d ↗
65. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.12510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.125 ↗
66. 10.1039/c8tb01757c10.1039/c8tb01757c ↗
67. 10.1007/s10570-021-03853-310.1007/s10570-021-03853-3 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.04.00810.1016/j.jcis.2016.04.008 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.bprint.2016.08.00310.1016/j.bprint.2016.08.003 ↗