Common Strategy: Mounting the Rod-like Ni-Based MOF on Hydrangea-Shaped Nickel Hydroxide for Superior Electrocatalytic Methanol Oxidation Reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Developing efficient metal–organic framework (MOF)-based electrocatalysts with improvable activity and persistence toward the methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) is attracting great research attention but still remains an enormous challenge. Herein, a facile strategy, hydrangea-shaped nickel hydroxide template-directed synthesis of the hierarchically structured Ni-MOF on the Ni(OH)2 heterocomposite (denoted as Ni–Ni) for efficient MOR, is developed. The unique hierarchical structure and synergistic effect of the heterocomposite afford more exposed active sites, a facile ion diffusion path, and improved conductivity, favorable for improving MOR catalytic performance. Remarkably, the optimized Ni–Ni-2 material delivers an excellent activity with a high peak current density (24.6 mA cm–2). Furthermore, to prove the universality of this strategy, NixCu1–x(OH)2 isometallic hydroxide was used as the precursor, and a series of MOF-74/CuxNi1–x(OH)2 (denoted as Ni–NiCu) heterogeneous materials have been prepared and could be used as an effective electrocatalyst to catalyze MOR. The results indicate that this strategy can be used in the synthesis of other new composite materials with specific hierarchical structures for a more efficient electrocatalytic system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Material and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory of Inorganic Nonmetallic Crystalline and Energy Conversion Materials, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jacs.5b0775610.1021/jacs.5b07756 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms751210.1038/ncomms7512 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-020-18064-w10.1038/s41467-020-18064-w ↗
4. 10.1002/anie.20180292310.1002/anie.201802923 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41560-019-0355-910.1038/s41560-019-0355-9 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41560-020-00709-110.1038/s41560-020-00709-1 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20190113910.1002/adma.201901139 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20180058410.1002/aenm.201800584 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.0c0888210.1021/jacs.0c08882 ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.7b1235310.1021/jacs.7b12353 ↗
11. 10.1039/c8ee02939c10.1039/c8ee02939c ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.5b0818610.1021/jacs.5b08186 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12759510.1016/j.cej.2020.127595 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.02.02310.1016/j.chempr.2018.02.023 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja403440e10.1021/ja403440e ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20190151010.1002/adfm.201901510 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20170087410.1002/adma.201700874 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0022310.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00223 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.enchem.2020.10002710.1016/j.enchem.2020.100027 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.9b0708410.1021/jacs.9b07084 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20170723810.1002/anie.201707238 ↗
22. 10.1002/anie.20181363410.1002/anie.201813634 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.06.01610.1016/j.chempr.2019.06.016 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.9b1346110.1021/jacs.9b13461 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms930410.1038/ncomms9304 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0194710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01947 ↗
27. 10.1093/nsr/nwz13710.1093/nsr/nwz137 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0140910.1021/acsnano.7b01409 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.00810.1016/j.joule.2017.08.008 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20160264310.1002/aenm.201602643 ↗
31. 10.1038/srep1055610.1038/srep10556 ↗
32. 10.1039/c9cs00880b10.1039/c9cs00880b ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20180119310.1002/aenm.201801193 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20200604210.1002/adma.202006042 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.8b0874410.1021/jacs.8b08744 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20180741810.1002/adfm.201807418 ↗
37. 10.1039/c8nr09680e10.1039/c8nr09680e ↗
38. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.06.02310.1016/j.micromeso.2013.06.023 ↗