Cellular and Molecular Interaction of Human Dermal Fibroblasts with Bacterial Nanocellulose Composite Hydrogel for Tissue Regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
The evaluation of the interaction of cells with biomaterials is fundamental to establish the suitability of the biomaterial for a specific application. In this study, the properties of bacterial nanocellulose/acrylic acid (BNC/AA) hydrogels fabricated with varying BNC to AA ratios and electron-beam irradiation doses were determined. The manner these hydrogel properties influence the behavior of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) at the cellular and molecular levels was also investigated, relating it to its application both as a cell carrier and wound dressing material. Swelling, hardness, adhesive force (wet), porosity, and hydrophilicity (dry) of the hydrogels were dependent on the degree of cross-linking and the amount of AA incorporated in the hydrogels. However, water vapor transmission rate, pore size, hydrophilicity (semidry), and topography were similar between all formulations, leading to a similar cell attachment and proliferation profile. At the cellular level, the hydrogel demonstrated rapid cell adhesion, maintained HDFs viability and morphology, restricted cellular migration, and facilitated fast transfer of cells. At the molecular level, the hydrogel affected nine wound-healing genes (IL6, IL10, MMP2, CTSK, FGF7, GM-CSF, TGFB1, COX2, and F3). The findings indicate that the BNC/AA hydrogel is a potential biomaterial that can be employed as a wound-dressing material to incorporate HDFs for the acceleration of wound healing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tissue Engineering Centre, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
IDEA-UKM, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Funding
Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1371/journal.pone.010795210.1371/journal.pone.0107952 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71741-210.1016/S1369-7021(06)71741-2 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10616-015-9895-410.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.022 ↗
5. 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.40710.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.407 ↗
6. 10.1093/rb/rbx02510.1093/rb/rbx025 ↗
7. 10.1088/1748-6041/11/5/05500110.1088/1748-6041/11/5/055001 ↗
8. 10.1097/00004630-199907000-0000210.1097/00004630-199907000-00002 ↗
9. 10.2337/diacare.26.6.170110.2337/diacare.26.6.1701 ↗
10. 10.3390/healthcare203035610.3390/healthcare2030356 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.003 ↗
12. 10.1088/1468-6996/13/6/06421010.1088/1468-6996/13/6/064210 ↗
13. 10.1371/journal.pone.012235910.1371/journal.pone.0122359 ↗
14. 10.3390/jfb304086410.3390/jfb3040864 ↗
15. 10.1021/mp500301510.1021/mp5003015 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598-018-21174-710.1038/s41598-018-21174-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.burns.2006.08.02210.1016/j.burns.2006.08.022 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.10910.1016/j.msec.2016.05.109 ↗
19. 10.1371/journal.pone.012728710.1371/journal.pone.0127287 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10570-015-0551-010.1007/s10570-015-0551-0 ↗
21. 10.1515/adms-2016-002210.1515/adms-2016-0022 ↗
22. 10.1155/2015/82127910.1155/2015/821279 ↗
23. 10.1100/2012/69720110.1100/2012/697201 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.025 ↗
25. 10.1002/jbm.b.3377610.1002/jbm.b.33776 ↗
26. 10.1038/477042a10.1038/477042a ↗
27. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03886.x10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03886.x ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.11.04510.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.11.045 ↗
29. Kiselioviene S. · Cellul. Chem. Technol. · 2016 · 50 · 915
30. 10.1038/srep3947710.1038/srep39477 ↗
31. 10.1080/00914037.2014.100209510.1080/00914037.2014.1002095 ↗
32. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep2459610.1038/srep24596 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.03.05910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.03.059 ↗
35. 10.5339/gcsp.2013.3810.5339/gcsp.2013.38 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.06.00410.1016/j.ejps.2014.06.004 ↗
37. 10.1371/journal.pone.007477910.1371/journal.pone.0074779 ↗
38. Chang H. I. · 2011 · 569
39. 10.1002/mabi.20110046610.1002/mabi.201100466 ↗
40. 10.1163/15685620778085251410.1163/156856207780852514 ↗
41. 10.1002/jbm.a.3536710.1002/jbm.a.35367 ↗
42. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/30/30400210.1088/0022-3727/49/30/304002 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.12.01310.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.12.013 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.02910.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.029 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0012910.1021/acs.biomac.5b00129 ↗
46. 10.1163/016942409X1259823156818610.1163/016942409X12598231568186 ↗
47. 10.1088/2057-1976/1/4/04501410.1088/2057-1976/1/4/045014 ↗
48. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
49. 10.1088/1468-6996/13/3/03500210.1088/1468-6996/13/3/035002 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.00710.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.007 ↗
51. 10.1089/wound.2014.056110.1089/wound.2014.0561 ↗
52. Rohl J. · Wound Pract. Res. · 2015 · 23 · 8
53. 10.1189/jlb.080239710.1189/jlb.0802397 ↗
54. 10.1089/wound.2013.046110.1089/wound.2013.0461 ↗
55. 10.1055/s-0037-160618110.1055/s-0037-1606181 ↗
56. 10.1038/sj.jid.570053510.1038/sj.jid.5700535 ↗
57. 10.1007/s00726-010-0689-x10.1007/s00726-010-0689-x ↗
58. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x ↗
59. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07979.x10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07979.x ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.02610.1016/j.jss.2014.12.026 ↗
61. 10.1097/01.lab.0000035024.75914.3910.1097/01.lab.0000035024.75914.39 ↗