Quercetin Inlaid Silk Fibroin/Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Promotes Enhanced Osteogenesis
Source abstract
Abstract
There is a significant rise in the bone grafts demand worldwide to treat bone defects owing to continuous increase in conditions such as injury, trauma, diseases, or infections. Therefore, development of three-dimensional scaffolds has evolved as a reliable technology to address the current limitations for bone tissue regeneration. Mimicking the natural bone, in this study, we have designed a silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite scaffold inlaid with a bioactive phytochemical (quercetin) at different concentrations for promoting osteogenesis, especially focusing on quercetin ability for enhancing bone health. Characterization of the quercetin/silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite (Qtn/SF/HAp) scaffolds showed an increased pore size and irregular porous microstructure with good mechanical strength. The Qtn (low-content)/SF/HAp scaffold was found to be an efficient cell carrier facilitating cellular growth, osteogenic differentiation, and proliferation as compared to SF/HAp and Qtn (high-content)/SF/HAp scaffolds. However, Qtn (high-content)/SF/HAp was observed to inhibit cell proliferation without any effects on cell viability. In vitro and in vivo outcomes studied using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs) confirm the cytocompatibility, osteogenic differentiation ability, and prominent upregulation of the bone-specific gene expressions for the rBMSCs-seeded Qtn/SF/HAp scaffolds. In particular, the implanted Qtn (low-content)/SF/HAp scaffolds at the bone defect site were found to be well-attached and amalgamated with the surrounding tissues with approximately 80% bone volume recovery at 6 weeks after surgery as compared with other groups. Based on the aforementioned observations highlighting the quercetin efficiency for bone regeneration, the as-synthesized Qtn (low-content)/SF/HAp scaffolds can be envisioned to provide a biomimetic bone-like microenvironment promoting rBMSCs differentiation into osteoblast, thus suggesting a potential alternative graft for high-performance regeneration of bone tissues.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of BIN Convergence Technology, Department of Polymer Nano Science & Technology and Polymer Materials Fusion Research Center, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54896, Republic of Korea
Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Avene Northeast, Box 355061, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
Funding
Korea Health Industry Development Institute · National Research Foundation of Korea
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joms.2014.02.00510.1016/j.joms.2014.02.005 ↗
2. 10.1038/boneres.2014.1710.1038/boneres.2014.17 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.01010.1016/j.msec.2014.12.010 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.05810.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.058 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.049 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.01210.1016/j.msec.2014.04.012 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.02610.1016/j.nano.2016.08.026 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.05610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.056 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.b.3375110.1002/jbm.b.33751 ↗
10. 10.1002/jbm.b.3340210.1002/jbm.b.33402 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.06710.1016/j.msec.2017.02.067 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.00310.1016/j.msec.2017.05.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.11310.1016/j.msec.2016.11.113 ↗
14. 10.1038/nature0581210.1038/nature05812 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.02910.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.029 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.01410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.014 ↗
17. 10.2174/18715280978868102910.2174/187152809788681029 ↗
18. 10.1002/mnfr.20130083610.1002/mnfr.201300836 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.06.05910.1016/j.ejphar.2011.06.059 ↗
20. 10.1691/ph.2007.5.668210.1691/ph.2007.5.6682 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biochi.2012.06.03310.1016/j.biochi.2012.06.033 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0006-2952(02)01445-410.1016/S0006-2952(02)01445-4 ↗
23. 10.1002/jcb.2007110.1002/jcb.20071 ↗
24. 10.1248/bpb.27.50410.1248/bpb.27.504 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.09.04110.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.09.041 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.00210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.002 ↗
27. 10.1080/09205063.2017.139471210.1080/09205063.2017.1394712 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.04410.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.044 ↗
30. 10.25141/2471-657X-2015-1.000110.25141/2471-657X-2015-1.0001 ↗
31. 10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/03500110.1088/1468-6996/16/3/035001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.08.02110.1016/j.bcp.2006.08.021 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.012 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.scr.2013.12.00110.1016/j.scr.2013.12.001 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.phymed.2013.03.00110.1016/j.phymed.2013.03.001 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.002 ↗
37. 10.1002/jbm.a.3427410.1002/jbm.a.34274 ↗
38. 10.3390/ma811543010.3390/ma8115430 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.026 ↗
40. 10.1248/bpb.27.50410.1248/bpb.27.504 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.11.05810.1016/j.ejphar.2003.11.058 ↗
42. Gulati N. · Anticancer Res. · 2006 · 26 · 1177
43. 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.12.04610.1016/j.lfs.2005.12.046 ↗
44. 10.2741/197010.2741/1970 ↗