Electrodeposited Nanoporous versus Nanoparticulate ZnO Films of Similar Roughness for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a comparative study of two different ZnO porous film morphologies for dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) fabrications. Nanoparticulate ZnO was prepared by the doctor-blade technique starting from a paste containing ZnO nanoparticles. Nanoporous ZnO films were grown by a soft template-assisted electrochemical growth technique. The film thicknesses were adjusted at similar roughness of about 300 in order to permit a worthy comparison. The effects on the cell performances of sensitization by dyes belonging to three different families, namely, xanthene (eosin Y) and indoline (D102, D131, D149 and D205) organic dyes as well as a ruthenium polypyridine complex (N719), have been investigated. The mesoporous electrodeposited matrix exhibits significant morphological changes upon the photoanode preparation, especially upon the dye sensitization, that yield to a dramatic change of the inner layer morphology and increase in the layer internal specific surface area. In the case of indoline dyes, better efficiencies were found with the electrodeposited ZnO porous matrixes compared to the nanoparticulate ones, in spite of significantly shorter electron lifetimes measured by impedance spectroscopy. The observation is interpreted in terms of much shorter transfer time in the oxide in the case of the electrodeposited ZnO films. Among the tested dyes, the D149 and D205 indoline organic dyes with a strong acceptor group were found the most efficient with the best cell over 4.6% of overall conversion efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire d’Électrochimie, Chimie des Interfaces et Modélisation pour l’Énergie, UMR7575, CNRS-Chimie Paristech, ENSCP, 11 rue P. et M. Curie, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France, Saint-Gobain Recherche, 39 quai Lucien Lefranc, 93303 Aubervilliers Cedex France, and J. Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Dolejskova 3, 18223 Prague 8, Czech Republic
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Oosterhout S. D. · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 81810.1038/nmat2533 ↗
2. Zhang Q. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 408710.1002/adma.200803827 ↗
3. O’Regan B. · Nature · 1991 · 353 · 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
4. Nazeeruddin M. K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 1683510.1021/ja052467l ↗
5. Keis K. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2002 · 73 · 5110.1016/S0927-0248(01)00110-6 ↗
6. Zhang Q. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 240210.1002/anie.200704919 ↗
7. Yoshida T. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 1710.1002/adfm.200700188 ↗
8. Chen Z. G. · Electrochim. Acta · 2006 · 51 · 587010.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.026 ↗
9. Saito M. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2008 · 1 · 28010.1039/b806096g ↗
10. Zhang Q. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 408710.1002/adma.200803827 ↗
11. Gonzalez-Valls I. · Energy Environ. Science · 2009 · 2 · 1910.1039/B811536B ↗
12. Cheng H. M. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2010 · 3 · 44210.1039/b915725e ↗
13. Le Bahers T. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 1127610.1039/b914626a ↗
14. Bauer C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 558510.1021/jp004121x ↗
15. Law M. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 45510.1038/nmat1387 ↗
16. Lupan O. · J. Photochem. Photobiol. A · 2010 · 211 · 6510.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.02.004 ↗
17. Xu C. K. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 12510.1021/jp9085415 ↗
18. Pauporté T. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 1007710.1021/jp034079g ↗
19. Yoshida T. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · C60810.1149/1.1598213 ↗
20. Pauporté T. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 763910.1021/jp071465f ↗
21. Pauporté T. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 1007710.1021/jp034079g ↗
22. Goux A. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 1054510.1021/la061199h ↗
23. Graaf H. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 691010.1021/jp902190t ↗
24. Lupan O. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2010 · 312 · 245410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.05.022 ↗
25. Goux A. · ChemPhysChem · 2007 · 8 · 92610.1002/cphc.200700009 ↗
26. Yoshida T. · Chem. Commun. · 2004 · 4 · 40010.1039/B312127E ↗
27. Dentani T. · New J. Chem. · 2009 · 33 · 9310.1039/B808959K ↗
28. Hasin P. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 745610.1021/jp810678a ↗
29. Le Bahers T. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 1210.1039/c004358c ↗
30. Goux A. · Electrochim. Acta · 2005 · 50 · 223910.1016/j.electacta.2004.10.007 ↗
31. Graaf H. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 691010.1021/jp902190t ↗
32. Pauporté T. · Electrochim. Acta · 2000 · 45 · 334510.1016/S0013-4686(00)00405-9 ↗
33. Keis K. · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 468810.1021/la9912702 ↗
34. Horiuchi H. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 257010.1021/jp0220027 ↗
35. Labat F. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1429010.1021/ja902833s ↗
36. Horiuchi T. · Chem. Commun. · 2003 · 24 · 3036.10.1039/b307819a ↗
37. Ito S. · Adv. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 120210.1002/adma.200502540 ↗
38. Bisquert J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 231310.1021/jp035395y ↗
39. Wang Q. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1494510.1021/jp052768h ↗
40. Brug G. J. · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 1984 · 176 · 27510.1016/S0022-0728(84)80324-1 ↗
41. Pauporté T. · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 2006 · 36 · 3310.1007/s10800-005-9011-0 ↗
42. Oekermann T. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 836410.1021/jp037831m ↗
43. Nonomura K. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 9 · 184310.1039/b617986j ↗
44. Kalyanasundaram, K., Ed.Dye-sensitized solar cells;EPFL press:Lausanne, 2010; p331.10.1201/b16409 ↗
45. Hagfeldt A. · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 11010.1021/cr900356p ↗