Improving the Efficiency of Mustard Gas Simulant Detoxification by Tuning the Singlet Oxygen Quantum Yield in Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Corresponding Thin Films
Source abstract
Abstract
The photocatalytically driven partial oxidation of a mustard gas simulant, 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES), was studied using the perylene-based metal-organic framework (MOF) UMCM-313 and compared to the activities of the Zr-based MOFs: PCN-222/MOF-545 and NU-1000. The rates of CEES oxidation positively correlated with the singlet oxygen quantum yield of the MOF linkers, porphyrin (PCN-222/MOF-545) < pyrene (NU-1000) < perylene (UMCM-313). Subsequently, thin films of UMCM-313 and NU-1000 were solvothermally grown on a conductive glass substrate to minimize catalyst loading and prevent light scattering by suspended MOF particles. Using a conductive glass support, the initial turnover frequencies of the MOFs in the photocatalytic reaction improved by 10-fold.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
Argonne-Northwestern Solar Energy Research (ANSER) Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences · Defense Threat Reduction Agency
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tox.2005.06.01110.1016/j.tox.2005.06.011 ↗
2. Robinson M. L. J. P. · 1971
3. Karasik T. W. · 2002
4. 10.1016/j.tox.2005.06.01410.1016/j.tox.2005.06.014 ↗
5. 10.3109/10408444.2010.54122410.3109/10408444.2010.541224 ↗
6. 10.1345/aph.1K44510.1345/aph.1K445 ↗
7. 10.1039/B705025A10.1039/B705025A ↗
8. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a12617810.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a126178 ↗
9. 10.1021/ie010732f10.1021/ie010732f ↗
10. 10.1021/cr010371d10.1021/cr010371d ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20150374110.1002/anie.201503741 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6TA05903A10.1039/C6TA05903A ↗
13. 10.1002/chem.20160497210.1002/chem.201604972 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.7b0705510.1021/acsami.7b07055 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.7b0549410.1021/acsami.7b05494 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0010610.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00106 ↗
17. 10.1080/1064338070164365010.1080/10643380701643650 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja00160a03810.1021/ja00160a038 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20030061010.1002/anie.200300610 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0262610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02626 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.111627510.1126/science.1116275 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
23. 10.1039/b802426j10.1039/b802426j ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.5b0390410.1021/jacs.5b03904 ↗
25. 10.1039/C5DT04163E10.1039/C5DT04163E ↗
26. Juan-Alcañiz J. · 2013 · 12 · 31010.1039/9781849737586-00310 ↗
27. Roman E. S. · 2016 · 18310.1039/9781782622208-00183 ↗
28. 10.1021/jp952107s10.1021/jp952107s ↗
29. 10.1021/ic200295h10.1021/ic200295h ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.6b1207410.1021/jacs.6b12074 ↗
31. 10.1039/C7SC05296K10.1039/C7SC05296K ↗
32. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb03322.x10.1111/j.1751-1097.1999.tb03322.x ↗
33. 10.1063/1.55593410.1063/1.555934 ↗
34. 10.1021/ac301183w10.1021/ac301183w ↗
35. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0030410.1021/acssensors.7b00304 ↗
36. 10.1039/c0cs00147c10.1039/c0cs00147c ↗
37. 10.1039/b805038b10.1039/b805038b ↗
38. 10.1021/cm403726v10.1021/cm403726v ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.5b0690110.1021/acsami.5b06901 ↗
40. 10.1002/anie.20120447510.1002/anie.201204475 ↗
41. 10.1038/nprot.2016.00110.1038/nprot.2016.001 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0069810.1021/acs.cgd.6b00698 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0499610.1021/acsnano.6b04996 ↗
44. 10.1039/C4CC01938E10.1039/C4CC01938E ↗
45. 10.1039/C6CY01093H10.1039/C6CY01093H ↗
46. 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)60755-410.1016/S0040-4039(00)60755-4 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja973782d10.1021/ja973782d ↗