journal article·2014-05-28Open access

Angiogenesis in Bone Regeneration: Tailored Calcium Release in Hybrid Fibrous Scaffolds

Oscar Castaño, Nadège Sachot, Elena Xuriguera, Elisabeth Engel, Josep A. Planell, Jeong-Hui Park, Guang-Zhen Jin, Tae-Hyun Kim, Joong-Hyun Kim, Hae-Won Kim

Abstract

In bone regeneration, silicon-based calcium phosphate glasses (Bioglasses) have been widely used since the 1970s. However, they dissolve very slowly because of their high amount of Si (SiO2 > 45%). Recently, our group has found that calcium ions released by the degradation of glasses in which the job of silicon is done by just 5% of TiO2 are effective angiogenic promoters, because of their stimulation of a cell-membrane calcium sensing receptor (CaSR). Based on this, other focused tests on angiogenesis have found that Bioglasses also have the potential to be angiogenic promoters even with high contents of silicon (80%); however, their slow degradation is still a problem, as the levels of silicon cannot be decreased any lower than 45%. In this work, we propose a new generation of hybrid organically modified glasses, ormoglasses, that enable the levels of silicon to be reduced, therefore speeding up the degradation process. Using electrospinning as a faithful way to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), we successfully produced hybrid fibrous mats with three different contents of Si (40, 52, and 70%), and thus three different calcium ion release rates, using an ormoglass-polycaprolactone blend approach. These mats offered a good platform to evaluate different calcium release rates as osteogenic promoters in an in vivo subcutaneous environment. Complementary data were collected to complement Ca(2+) release analysis, such as stiffness evaluation by AFM, ζ-potential, morphology evaluation by FESEM, proliferation and differentiation analysis, as well as in vivo subcutaneous implantations. Material and biological characterization suggested that compositions of organic/inorganic hybrid materials with a Si content equivalent to 40%, which were also those that released more calcium, were osteogenic. They also showed a greater ability to form blood vessels. These results suggest that Si-based ormoglasses can be considered an efficient tool for calcium release modulation, which could play a key role in the angiogenic promoting process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Biomaterials for Regenerative Therapies, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), 08028, Barcelona, Spain

CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Dpt. Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Dpt. Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, 330-714 Cheonan, South Korea

Dpt. Nanobiomedical Science & BK21 Plus NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University, 330-714 Cheonan, South Korea

Funding

European Commission

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Brown E. M. · Physiol. Rev. · 2001 · 81 · 23910.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.239 ↗
2. Mentaverri R. · FASEB J. · 2006 · 20 · 256210.1096/fj.06-6304fje ↗
3. Adams G. B. · Nature · 2006 · 439 · 59910.1038/nature04247 ↗
4. Tommila M. · J. R. Soc. Interface · 2009 · 6 · 87310.1098/rsif.2009.0020 ↗
5. Yamauchi M. · Am. J. Physiol.: Endocrinol. Metab. · 2005 · 288 · E608
6. Hoeben A. · Pharmacol. Rev. · 2004 · 56 · 54910.1124/pr.56.4.3 ↗
7. Aguirre A. · Eur. Cells Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 9010.22203/eCM.v024a07 ↗
8. Rezwan K. · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 341310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
9. Engel E. · Trends Biotechnol. · 2008 · 26 · 3910.1016/j.tibtech.2007.10.005 ↗
10. Zhang X. · Mater. Lett. · 2012 · 73 · 17210.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.049 ↗
11. Zou B. · Acta Biomater. · 2012 · 8 · 157610.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.003 ↗
12. Datta P. · Colloids Surf., B · 2012
13. Xie J. · Acta Biomater. · 2012 · 8 · 81110.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.009 ↗
14. Hench L. L. · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. · 2006 · 17 · 967
15. Rahaman M. N. · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 235510.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
16. Navarro M. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2003 · 86 · 134510.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03474.x ↗
17. Eldesoqi K. · PLoS One · 2013 · 8 · e7905810.1371/journal.pone.0079058 ↗
18. Niemelä T. · Acta Biomater. · 2005 · 1 · 23510.1016/j.actbio.2004.11.002 ↗
19. Blaker J. J. · Acta Biomater. · 2005 · 1 · 64310.1016/j.actbio.2005.07.003 ↗
20. Gonzalez B. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2009 · 19 · 901210.1039/b915331d ↗
21. Kim H.-W. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2006 · 79 · 64310.1002/jbm.a.30866 ↗
22. Sachot N. · J. R. Soc. Interface · 2013 · 10 · 2013068410.1098/rsif.2013.0684 ↗
23. Song J.-H. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2008 · 84 · 87510.1002/jbm.a.31330 ↗
24. Jang J. H. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2009 · 61 · 106510.1016/j.addr.2009.07.008 ↗
25. Kim H. W. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2006 · 16 · 152910.1002/adfm.200500750 ↗
26. Rasband W. S. · 1997
27. Elzein T. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2004 · 273 · 38110.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.001 ↗
28. Dejarguin B. V. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1975 · 53 · 31410.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
29. Nečas D. · Cent. Eur. J. Phys. · 2012 · 10 · 181
30. Charles-Harris M. · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. · 2008 · 19 · 1503
31. Biresaw G. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 2001 · 39 · 92010.1002/polb.1067 ↗
32. Serra T. · Acta Biomater. · 2013 · 9 · 552110.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.041 ↗
33. Hartman O. · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 570010.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.017 ↗
34. Álvarez Z. · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 222110.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.001 ↗
35. Engler A. J. · Cell · 2006 · 126 · 67710.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
36. Vaquette C. · Mendeleev Commun. · 2008 · 18 · 3810.1016/j.mencom.2008.01.015 ↗
37. Kim J.-h. · Tissue Eng., Part C · 2012 · 18 · 91310.1089/ten.tec.2011.0731 ↗
38. Kizuki T. · Biomaterials · 2003 · 24 · 94110.1016/S0142-9612(02)00430-1 ↗
39. Guo L. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2008 · 87 · 90310.1002/jbm.a.31834 ↗
40. Chen H. · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2011 · 6 · 45310.1016/j.nano.2009.11.006 ↗
41. Oyane A. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2003 · 65 · 18810.1002/jbm.a.10482 ↗
42. González-Vázquez A. · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 282410.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.004 ↗
43. Miron R. J. · J. Dent. Res. · 2012 · 91 · 73610.1177/0022034511435260 ↗
44. Vila O. F. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2013 · 101 · 93210.1002/jbm.a.34391 ↗
45. Aguirre A. · Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. · 2010 · 393 · 15610.1016/j.bbrc.2010.01.109 ↗
46. Laschke M. · Tissue Eng. · 2006 · 12 · 209310.1089/ten.2006.12.2093 ↗
47. Yamaguchi T. · J. Bone Miner. Res. · 1998 · 13 · 153010.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1530 ↗
48. Mammoto A. · Nature · 2009 · 457 · 110310.1038/nature07765 ↗
49. Mulder L. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2008 · 84 · 50810.1002/jbm.a.31474 ↗