journal article·2020-07-22Open access

Establishing Ultralow Activation Energies for Lithium Transport in Garnet Electrolytes

Federico M. Pesci, Antonio Bertei, Rowena H. Brugge, Steffen P. Emge, A. K. Ola Hekselman, Lauren E. Marbella, Clare P. Grey, Ainara Aguadero

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 29

Abstract

Garnet-type structured lithium ion conducting ceramics represent a promising alternative to liquid-based electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. However, their performance is limited by their polycrystalline nature and inherent inhomogeneous current distribution due to different ion dynamics at grains, grain boundaries, and interfaces. In this study, we use a combination of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, distribution of relaxation time analysis, and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), in order to understand the role that bulk, grain boundary, and interfacial processes play in the ionic transport and electrochemical performance of garnet-based cells. Variable temperature impedance analysis reveals the lowest activation energy for Li transport in the bulk of the garnet electrolyte (0.15 eV), consistent with pulsed field gradient NMR spectroscopy measurements (0.14 eV). We also show a decrease in grain boundary activation energy at temperatures below 0 °C, that is followed by the total conductivity, suggesting that the bottleneck to ionic transport resides in the grain boundaries. We reveal that the grain boundary activation energy is heavily affected by its composition that, in turn, is mainly affected by the segregation of dopants and Li. We suggest that by controlling the grain boundary composition, it would be possible to pave the way toward targeted engineering of garnet-type electrolytes and ameliorate their electrochemical performance in order to enable their use in commercial devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BP, U.K.

Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy

Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.

Department of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Royal Society · H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies · University of Cambridge

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0344810.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03448 ↗
3. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.3010.1038/nenergy.2016.30 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.5b0751710.1021/acsami.5b07517 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jssc.2009.05.02010.1016/j.jssc.2009.05.020 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.02210.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.022 ↗
7. 10.1021/cm500806910.1021/cm5008069 ↗
8. 10.1039/c2cp40634a10.1039/c2cp40634a ↗
9. 10.1039/c9ee01548e10.1039/c9ee01548e ↗
10. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.01910.1016/j.joule.2019.03.019 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0300210.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03002 ↗
12. 10.1039/C8TA08366E10.1039/C8TA08366E ↗
13. 10.1039/c9ta14177d10.1039/c9ta14177d ↗
14. 10.1039/c4cp02921f10.1039/c4cp02921f ↗
15. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0172310.1021/acsaem.8b01723 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7TA03162A10.1039/C7TA03162A ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat482110.1038/nmat4821 ↗
18. 10.1016/J.JOULE.2019.06.01710.1016/J.JOULE.2019.06.017 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41563-019-0438-910.1038/s41563-019-0438-9 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.9b0253710.1021/acsami.9b02537 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41560-019-0478-z10.1038/s41560-019-0478-z ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0048610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00486 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.05810.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.058 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0240110.1021/acsenergylett.9b02401 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20160604210.1002/adma.201606042 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20190256810.1002/aenm.201902568 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0057910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00579 ↗
28. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/42/42400510.1088/0957-4484/24/42/424005 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20070114410.1002/anie.200701144 ↗
30. 10.1002/celc.20130002210.1002/celc.201300022 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.1990002030410.1002/adma.19900020304 ↗
32. 10.1023/A:102059952516010.1023/A:1020599525160 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.09710.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.097 ↗
34. 10.1107/s002188986900655810.1107/s0021889869006558 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10800-011-0280-510.1007/s10800-011-0280-5 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.204421010.1149/1.2044210 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.03410.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.034 ↗
38. Kramers-Kronig Validity Test Lin-KK for Impedance Spectra; https://www.iam.kit.edu/wet/english/Lin-KK.php.
39. 10.1021/cm303542x10.1021/cm303542x ↗
40. 10.1007/s10832-017-0071-410.1007/s10832-017-0071-4 ↗
41. Brugge R. H. · J. Mater. Chem. A
42. 10.1039/C3TA13999A10.1039/C3TA13999A ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.6b1390210.1021/acsami.6b13902 ↗
44. 10.1039/c1cp22108f10.1039/c1cp22108f ↗
45. Clematis, D.; Ferrari, T.; Bertei, A.; Nicolella, C.; Carpanese, M. P.; Asensio, A. M.; Viviani, M.; Presto, S.; Barbucci, A. On the Stabilization and Extension of the Distribution of Relaxation Times Analysis. To be submitted for publication.