Dark Current Reduction Strategy via a Layer-By-Layer Solution Process for a High-Performance All-Polymer Photodetector
Source abstract
Abstract
The ideal bulk-heterojunction for high-performance organic photodetectors prefers a morphology with a vertically gradient component to suppress the leaking current. Here, we demonstrate an all-polymer photodetector with a segregated bulk-heterojunction active layer. This all-polymer photodetector exhibits a dramatically reduced dark current density because of its built-in charge blocking layer, with a responsivity of 0.25 A W–1 at a wavelength of approximately 600 nm and specific detectivity of 5.68 × 1012 cm Hz1/2 W–1 as calculated from the noise spectra at 1 kHz. To our knowledge, this is among the best performances reported for photodetectors based on both polymeric donor and acceptor in the photoactive layer. These findings present a facile approach to improving the specific detectivity of polymer photodetectors via a layer-by-layer solution process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Polymer Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
School of Science and Frontier Institute of Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Funding
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adom.20180052210.1002/adom.201800522 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20150540510.1002/adma.201505405 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20120497910.1002/adma.201204979 ↗
4. 10.1002/admt.20180010410.1002/admt.201800104 ↗
5. 10.1002/aelm.20180031110.1002/aelm.201800311 ↗
6. 10.1002/aelm.20170060110.1002/aelm.201700601 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20140329510.1002/adma.201403295 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20150223810.1002/adma.201502238 ↗
9. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.10010.1038/natrevmats.2016.100 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.117670610.1126/science.1176706 ↗
11. 10.1039/c7py00497d10.1039/c7py00497d ↗
12. 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.1724210.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.17242 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20180235910.1002/adma.201802359 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20170145010.1002/aenm.201701450 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20140209410.1002/adfm.201402094 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20180249910.1002/adma.201802499 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20140202010.1002/aenm.201402020 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20160460310.1002/adma.201604603 ↗
19. 10.1039/c4tc02103g10.1039/c4tc02103g ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.8b0587510.1021/acsami.8b05875 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.8b0570010.1021/acsami.8b05700 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20170308510.1002/aenm.201703085 ↗
23. 10.1039/c7ee00619e10.1039/c7ee00619e ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20170390610.1002/adma.201703906 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.12.03710.1016/j.orgel.2017.12.037 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.6b0517210.1021/acsami.6b05172 ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.8b0402710.1021/jacs.8b04027 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0398010.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03980 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20170469510.1002/adma.201704695 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.06.02010.1016/j.orgel.2013.06.020 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20150309010.1002/adma.201503090 ↗
32. 10.1002/aelm.20160040910.1002/aelm.201600409 ↗
33. 10.1002/macp.20160006110.1002/macp.201600061 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20180557010.1002/adfm.201805570 ↗
35. 10.1039/c7py01980g10.1039/c7py01980g ↗
36. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0000910.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00009 ↗
37. 10.1039/c6tc02338j10.1039/c6tc02338j ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.8b0382410.1021/acsami.8b03824 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.8b1514010.1021/acsami.8b15140 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.03610.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.036 ↗
41. 10.1002/adom.20180000110.1002/adom.201800001 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20180039110.1002/adfm.201800391 ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20140209410.1002/adfm.201402094 ↗