journal article·2020-03-18Open access

Boosting the Osteogenic and Angiogenic Performance of Multiscale Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffolds by In Vitro Generated Extracellular Matrix Decoration

Betül Aldemir Dikici, Gwendolen C. Reilly, Frederik Claeyssens

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 11

Abstract

Tissue engineering (TE)-based bone grafts are favorable alternatives to autografts and allografts. Both biochemical properties and the architectural features of TE scaffolds are crucial in their design process. Synthetic polymers are attractive biomaterials to be used in the manufacturing of TE scaffolds, due to various advantages, such as being relatively inexpensive, enabling precise reproducibility, possessing tunable mechanical/chemical properties, and ease of processing. However, such scaffolds need modifications to improve their limited interaction with biological tissues. Structurally, multiscale porosity is advantageous over single-scale porosity; therefore, in this study, we have considered two key points in the design of a bone repair material; (i) manufacture of multiscale porous scaffolds made of photocurable polycaprolactone (PCL) by a combination of emulsion templating and three-dimensional (3D) printing and (ii) decoration of these scaffolds with the in vitro generated bone-like extracellular matrix (ECM) to create biohybrid scaffolds that have improved biological performance compared to PCL-only scaffolds. Multiscale porous scaffolds were fabricated, bone cells were cultured on them, and then they were decellularized. The biological performance of these constructs was tested in vitro and in vivo. Mesenchymal progenitors were seeded on PCL-only and biohybrid scaffolds. Cells not only showed improved attachment on biohybrid scaffolds but also exhibited a significantly higher rate of cell growth and osteogenic activity. The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay was used to explore the angiogenic potential of the biohybrid scaffolds. The CAM assay indicated that the presence of the in vitro generated ECM on polymeric scaffolds resulted in higher angiogenic potential and a high degree of tissue infiltration. This study demonstrated that multiscale porous biohybrid scaffolds present a promising approach to improve bioactivity, encourage precursors to differentiate into mature bones, and to induce angiogenesis.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7HQ, United Kingdom

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, INSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, The Pam Liversidge Building, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Medical Research Council · Republic of Turkey ? The Ministry of National Education

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-210.1007/s10856-014-5240-2 ↗
2. 10.1002/jbm.a.3187510.1002/jbm.a.31875 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.03310.1016/j.injury.2011.03.033 ↗
4. 10.1155/2012/23623110.1155/2012/236231 ↗
5. 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R110.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1 ↗
6. Ranjan Dahiya U. · 2019
7. 10.1007/s11999-008-0444-810.1007/s11999-008-0444-8 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.02810.1016/j.arth.2014.03.028 ↗
9. Medical Devices Directive (MDD). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31993L0042:EN:HTML (accessed Jan 31, 2020).
10. Medical Device Regulation (MDR). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745 (accessed Jan 31, 2020).
11. 10.1111/jcpe.1305810.1111/jcpe.13058 ↗
12. 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-0040310.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00403 ↗
13. 10.3390/ijms2005106810.3390/ijms20051068 ↗
14. 10.1001/archsurg.1988.0140029002700310.1001/archsurg.1988.01400290027003 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.849352910.1126/science.8493529 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00421.x10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00421.x ↗
17. 10.1038/s41427-019-0139-510.1038/s41427-019-0139-5 ↗
18. 10.3390/membranes803006210.3390/membranes8030062 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.4352310.1002/app.43523 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.06410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.064 ↗
21. 10.1088/1758-5082/4/1/01500310.1088/1758-5082/4/1/015003 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5RA14549J10.1039/C5RA14549J ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.01710.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.bbe.2017.08.00710.1016/j.bbe.2017.08.007 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.09710.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.097 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.021 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.7b0501210.1021/acsami.7b05012 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.06110.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.061 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.01910.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.019 ↗
30. 10.1002/marc.20160023610.1002/marc.201600236 ↗
31. 10.1155/2011/29060210.1155/2011/290602 ↗
32. 10.1023/B:ABME.0000017544.36001.8e10.1023/B:ABME.0000017544.36001.8e ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.014 ↗
34. Ha T. L. B. · 2013
35. 10.1088/1757-899x/377/1/01201310.1088/1757-899x/377/1/012013 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10856-007-3057-y10.1007/s10856-007-3057-y ↗
37. 10.1002/macp.20140042710.1002/macp.201400427 ↗
38. 10.1002/jbm.1019310.1002/jbm.10193 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.008 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11095-008-9618-z10.1007/s11095-008-9618-z ↗
41. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00120-410.1016/S0142-9612(00)00120-4 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.02610.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.026 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00343-010.1016/S0142-9612(03)00343-0 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.015 ↗
45. 10.12717/DR.2017.21.1.00110.12717/DR.2017.21.1.001 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.001 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.025 ↗
48. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.058310.1089/ten.tea.2009.0583 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.08210.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.082 ↗
50. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.017510.1089/ten.tea.2010.0175 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.02310.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.023 ↗
52. 10.3390/ma1216264310.3390/ma12162643 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.003 ↗
54. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0045110.3389/fbioe.2019.00451 ↗
55. 10.1002/pola.2935310.1002/pola.29353 ↗
56. 10.1002/mabi.20180035110.1002/mabi.201800351 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.08610.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.086 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.08710.1016/j.msec.2016.04.087 ↗
59. 10.1021/ma035943610.1021/ma0359436 ↗
60. 10.2217/rme-2018-006810.2217/rme-2018-0068 ↗
61. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep1252272810.1111/1523-1747.ep12522728 ↗
62. 10.1002/jbm.a.3415010.1002/jbm.a.34150 ↗
63. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801654-1.00005-X10.1016/B978-0-12-801654-1.00005-X ↗
64. 10.1155/2017/983153410.1155/2017/9831534 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.05710.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057 ↗
66. Perea-Gil I. · Am. J. Transl. Res. · 2015 · 7 · 558
67. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.021 ↗
68. 10.1039/C9RA00655A10.1039/C9RA00655A ↗
69. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.05510.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.055 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.06410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 ↗
71. 10.1080/00914037.2015.110324110.1080/00914037.2015.1103241 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
73. 10.1039/C5PY00721F10.1039/C5PY00721F ↗
74. 10.1002/jbm.b.3369910.1002/jbm.b.33699 ↗
75. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0078410.1021/acs.biomac.8b00784 ↗
76. 10.1002/admt.20180061810.1002/admt.201800618 ↗
77. 10.1002/jbm.1029510.1002/jbm.10295 ↗
78. 10.1021/acsapm.8b0016510.1021/acsapm.8b00165 ↗
79. Ilia Anisa A. N. · World Acad. Sci., Eng. Technol. · 2010 · 62 · 691
80. 10.1002/jsfa.274018091010.1002/jsfa.2740180910 ↗
81. 10.1021/la052207h10.1021/la052207h ↗
82. 10.1021/la00046a01510.1021/la00046a015 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.petrol.2005.06.01410.1016/j.petrol.2005.06.014 ↗
84. 10.1002/andp.1911339031310.1002/andp.19113390313 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.07010.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.070 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.06310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.03010.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.030 ↗
88. 10.1089/ten.1999.5.3510.1089/ten.1999.5.35 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
90. 10.1002/jbm.82004030910.1002/jbm.820040309 ↗
91. 10.1038/srep2289810.1038/srep22898 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.002 ↗
93. 10.1002/jbm.a.3155910.1002/jbm.a.31559 ↗
94. 10.1088/1748-6041/10/3/03500110.1088/1748-6041/10/3/035001 ↗
95. 10.22203/eCM.v028a2110.22203/eCM.v028a21 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.052 ↗
97. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0063210.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00632 ↗
98. Ellis M. · 2005 · 1
99. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00075-710.1016/S0142-9612(99)00075-7 ↗
100. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.058210.1089/ten.tea.2011.0582 ↗