journal article·2017-04-05Open access

Chitosan-Intercalated Montmorillonite/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Nanofibers as a Platform to Guide Neuronlike Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells

Hatef Ghasemi Hamidabadi, Zahra Rezvani, Maryam Nazm Bojnordi, Haji Shirinzadeh, Alexander M. Seifalian, Mohammad Taghi Joghataei, Mojgan Razaghpour, Abbas Alibakhshi, Abolfazl Yazdanpanah, Maryam Salimi, Masoud Mozafari, Aleksandra M. Urbanska, Rui. L. Reis, Subhas C. Kundu, Mazaher Gholipourmalekabadi

Abstract

In this study, we present a novel chitosan-intercalated montmorillonite/poly(vinyl alcohol) (OMMT/PVA) nanofibrous mesh as a microenvironment for guiding differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) toward neuronlike cells. The OMMT was prepared through ion exchange reaction between the montmorillonite (MMT) and chitosan. The PVA solutions containing various concentrations of OMMT were electrospun to form 3D OMMT-PVA nanofibrous meshes. The biomechanical and biological characteristics of the nanofibrous meshes were evaluated by ATR-FTIR, XRD, SEM, MTT, and LDH specific activity, contact angle, and DAPI staining. They were carried out for mechanical properties, overall viability, and toxicity of the cells. The hDPSCs were seeded on the prepared scaffolds and induced with neuronal specific differentiation media at two differentiation stages (2 days at preinduction stage and 6 days at induction stage). The neural differentiation of the cells cultured on the meshes was evaluated by determining the expression of Oct-4, Nestin, NF-M, NF-H, MAP2, and βIII-tubulin in the cells after preinduction, at induction stages by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and immunostaining. All the synthesized nanofibers exhibited a homogeneous morphology with a favorable mechanical behavior. The population of the cells differentiated into neuronlike cells in all the experimental groups was significantly higher than that in control group. The expression level of the neuronal specific markers in the cells cultured on 5% OMMT/PVA meshes was significantly higher than the other groups. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the OMMT/PVA artificial nerve graft cultured with hDPSCs for regeneration of damaged neural tissues. These fabricated matrices may have a potential in neural tissue engineering applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bioengineering Research Group, Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Department, Materials and Energy Research Center (MERC), P.O. Box 14155-4777, Tehran, Iran

Semiconductor Department, Materials and Energy Research Center (MERC), P.O. Box 14155-4777, Tehran, Iran

Nanotechnology and Regenerative Medicine Commercialisation centre (Ltd) The London BioScience Innovation Centre, London, NW1 0NH, United Kingdom

Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran

Amirkabir University of Technology, Textile Department, No. 424, Tehran, Iran

Biomaterials Group, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering (Center of Excellence), Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran

Department of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Department of Medicine and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, United States

3Bs Research Group, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of Minho, AvePark 4805-017 Barco, Guimaraes, Portugal

Funding

Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03225.x10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03225.x ↗
2. 10.2174/13816120878689861710.2174/138161208786898617 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.6b0640310.1021/acsami.6b06403 ↗
4. 10.2217/nnm.09.3710.2217/nnm.09.37 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.11.00110.1016/j.neuint.2015.11.001 ↗
6. 10.1172/JCI4054310.1172/JCI40543 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature0496010.1038/nature04960 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.00910.1016/j.stem.2012.01.009 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.6b0180410.1021/acsami.6b01804 ↗
10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4184-05.200610.1523/JNEUROSCI.4184-05.2006 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
12. 10.1007/s12035-015-9199-x10.1007/s12035-015-9199-x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.09.00310.1016/j.jfma.2014.09.003 ↗
14. 10.1159/00043735010.1159/000437350 ↗
15. 10.1186/1423-0127-16-10810.1186/1423-0127-16-108 ↗
16. 10.1080/09506608.2016.125255110.1080/09506608.2016.1252551 ↗
17. 10.1155/2015/82127910.1155/2015/821279 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.trac.2016.06.01310.1016/j.trac.2016.06.013 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.00410.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.004 ↗
20. 10.1021/cm034304710.1021/cm0343047 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.07.00510.1016/j.arabjc.2014.07.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.03510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.035 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2367110.1002/pc.23671 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.3779710.1002/app.37797 ↗
25. Kabiri K. · Iran. Polym. J. · 2007 · 16 · 147
26. 10.2147/IJN.S2537610.2147/IJN.S25376 ↗
27. 10.1533/joti.2005.000310.1533/joti.2005.0003 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.2694910.1002/app.26949 ↗
29. 10.1073/pnas.24030979710.1073/pnas.240309797 ↗
30. 10.1182/blood-2003-05-167010.1182/blood-2003-05-1670 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.002 ↗
32. 10.1002/bab.128510.1002/bab.1285 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.04.02110.1016/j.actatropica.2015.04.021 ↗
34. 10.1007/BF0208286110.1007/BF02082861 ↗
35. 10.1007/s12033-013-9722-010.1007/s12033-013-9722-0 ↗
36. 10.1039/C4RA13972K10.1039/C4RA13972K ↗
37. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2012.07.00810.1016/j.pnsc.2012.07.008 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.12.01210.1016/j.jpcs.2009.12.012 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10856-006-0093-y10.1007/s10856-006-0093-y ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.01410.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.014 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.04110.1016/j.addr.2007.08.041 ↗
42. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71389-X10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71389-X ↗
43. 10.1039/B9NR00243J10.1039/B9NR00243J ↗
44. 10.1166/jbn.2011.128410.1166/jbn.2011.1284 ↗
45. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/11/11510110.1088/0957-4484/23/11/115101 ↗
46. 10.1159/00009961710.1159/000099617 ↗
47. 10.1177/15440591020810080610.1177/154405910208100806 ↗
48. 10.1080/1465324060085590510.1080/14653240600855905 ↗
49. 10.1002/term.197810.1002/term.1978 ↗
50. 10.1088/1468-6996/11/1/01410810.1088/1468-6996/11/1/014108 ↗
51. 10.1093/brain/awh51710.1093/brain/awh517 ↗
52. 10.1007/s12035-014-8812-810.1007/s12035-014-8812-8 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.06610.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.066 ↗
54. Samadikuchaksaraei A. · Biointerface. Res. Appl. Chem. · 2016 · 6 · 1222
55. 10.1007/s12035-015-9199-x10.1007/s12035-015-9199-x ↗
56. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.03310.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.033 ↗
57. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-097910.1634/stemcells.2007-0979 ↗
58. 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.2.17110.3346/jkms.2016.31.2.171 ↗
59. 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.003710.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0037 ↗
60. 10.1007/s00418-011-0858-310.1007/s00418-011-0858-3 ↗
61. 10.1634/stemcells.2008-028510.1634/stemcells.2008-0285 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.09.01010.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.09.010 ↗