journal article·2011-08-24

Polymer/Polymer Blend Solar Cells with 2.0% Efficiency Developed by Thermal Purification of Nanoscale-Phase-Separated Morphology

Daisuke Mori, Hiroaki Benten, Junya Kosaka, Hideo Ohkita, Shinzaburo Ito, Kunihito Miyake

Publisher page

Abstract

We have fabricated polymer/polymer blend solar cells consisting of poly(3-hexylthiophene) as the electron donor and poly{2,7-(9,9-didodecylfluorene)-alt-5,5-[4',7'-bis(2-thienyl)-2',1',3'-benzothiadiazole]} as the acceptor. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) was strongly dependent on solvents employed for spin coating. The best PCE of 2.0% was obtained for thermally annealed devices prepared from a chloroform solution, in contrast to devices fabricated from chlorobenzene and o-dichlorobenzene solutions. On the basis of the morphology-performance relationship in the polymer blends examined by atomic force microscopy and the photoluminescence quenching measurements, we conclude that the highly efficient performance is achieved by thermal purification of nanoscale-phase-separated domains formed by spin coating from chloroform.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Polymer Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Katsura, Nishikyo, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan

PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), 4-1-8 Honcho Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan

Tsukuba Research Laboratory, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., 6 Kitahara, Tsukuba 300-3294, Japan

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Krebs F. C. · Nanoscale · 2010 · 2 · 87310.1039/b9nr00430k ↗
2. Dennler G. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 132310.1002/adma.200801283 ↗
3. Veenstra S. C. · Prog. Photovoltaics: Res. Appl. · 2007 · 15 · 72710.1002/pip.796 ↗
4. McNeill C. R. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 384010.1002/adma.200900783 ↗
5. Arias A. C. · Maclomolecules · 2001 · 34 · 600510.1021/ma010240e ↗
6. Snaith H. J. · Nano Lett. · 2002 · 2 · 135310.1021/nl0257418 ↗
7. Shikler R. · Macromolecules · 2006 · 39 · 539310.1021/ma060421m ↗
8. McNeill C. R. · Macromolecules · 2009 · 42 · 334710.1021/ma801816r ↗
9. Swaraj S. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 286310.1021/nl1009266 ↗
10. Moore J. R. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2011 · 1 · 23010.1002/aenm.201000035 ↗
11. McNeill C. R. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 310310.1002/adfm.200900801 ↗
12. Nilsson S. · Macromolecules · 2007 · 40 · 829110.1021/ma070712a ↗
13. Müller C. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 351010.1002/adma.200800963 ↗
14. Zhou E. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 279910.1002/anie.201005408 ↗
15. McNeill C. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 19350610.1063/1.2738197 ↗
16. He X. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 130210.1021/nl904098m ↗
17. Li W. · Polymer · 2010 · 51 · 303110.1016/j.polymer.2010.05.015 ↗
18. Markov D. E. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2005 · 109 · 526610.1021/jp0509663 ↗
19. McNeill C. R. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1915310.1021/jp075904m ↗