Self-Healing Coatings Containing Core–Shell Nanofibers with pH-Responsive Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
The micro-nanofibers prepared by the electrospinning technique can be used as a good container for loading healing agents. The core-shell electrospun nanofibers with polyacrylonitrile as the outer shell and tannic acid (TA) and tung oil as the core healing agents were synthesized by a coaxial electrospinning method and exhibited pH-sensitive ability. The nanofibers as additives were added to an epoxy resin coating as a self-healing coating. The morphological stability of the electrospun nanofibers were observed by a scanning electron microscope and a transmission electron microscope. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and fluorescence microscopy reveal that the successful synthesis and uniform distribution of core-shell fibers. The mechanical properties test revealed that the tensile properties of the coating could be improved by adding nanofibers. The infrared mapping test, energy-dispersive spectrometry, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, which were carried out on the scratched part of the coating, proved the release of the healing agent in the damaged part. TA forms a protective film on the exposed metal surface through molecular adsorption under acidic conditions. Meanwhile, the curing of tung oil can effectively compensate into the microcracks to form a TA protective film, which could improve the self-healing performance. As the tung oil dries and solidifies in the alkaline solution, the cross-linking effect of the molecules is combined to form a tight film and strength the self-healing ability. TA as an acidic healing agent and tung oil as an alkaline healing agent played the role of pH-sensitive products in healing the cracked coating. The self-healing rates of coating immersing in 3.5 wt % acidic NaCl solution and alkaline solution were 81.6 and 71.2%, respectively. The composite coating shows a great pH-sensitive self-healing ability to heal the cracked coating.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Corrosion and Bio-fouling, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
National Materials Corrosion and Protection Data Center, Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.178443210.1063/1.1784432 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.00510.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.005 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.9b2169610.1021/acsami.9b21696 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.04010.1016/j.cej.2018.03.040 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0204510.1021/acsanm.8b02045 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.002 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.4057210.1002/app.40572 ↗
8. 10.1021/am500536t10.1021/am500536t ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.06210.1016/j.cej.2018.10.062 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.10825710.1016/j.corsci.2019.108257 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.7b0515910.1021/acsami.7b05159 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20090246510.1002/adma.200902465 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.06.02610.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.06.026 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.021 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jtice.2020.08.02110.1016/j.jtice.2020.08.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.08210.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.082 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.12210.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.122 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.14410.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.144 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12363010.1016/j.cej.2019.123630 ↗
20. 10.1021/am100742s10.1021/am100742s ↗
21. 10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00569-710.1016/S0254-0584(01)00569-7 ↗
22. 10.1021/ie501859s10.1021/ie501859s ↗
23. 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00546-910.1016/S0169-4332(02)00546-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.00110.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.08.01710.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.08.017 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20060464610.1002/anie.200604646 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12404610.1016/j.cej.2020.124046 ↗
28. 10.1039/C6RA06434E10.1039/C6RA06434E ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.11210.1016/j.cej.2015.08.112 ↗
30. 10.1021/am300524a10.1021/am300524a ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.01410.1016/j.cej.2019.01.014 ↗
32. 10.1039/C5CP00264H10.1039/C5CP00264H ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12456210.1016/j.cej.2020.124562 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.05710.1016/j.cej.2017.12.057 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.02810.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.028 ↗
36. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0196710.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01967 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.05910.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.059 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10882510.1016/j.corsci.2020.108825 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12374210.1016/j.cej.2019.123742 ↗
40. 10.1016/0010-938X(90)90032-Z10.1016/0010-938X(90)90032-Z ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.05410.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.054 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12281910.1016/j.cej.2019.122819 ↗
43. 10.1149/2.0931712jes10.1149/2.0931712jes ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.16010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.160 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.00510.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.005 ↗