Enhanced healing of critical-sized bone defects using degradable scaffolds with tailored composition through immunomodulation and angiogenesis
Source abstract
Abstract
The impact of orthopedic scaffolds on bone defect healing, particularly the late-stage bone remodeling process, is pivotal for the therapeutic outcome. This study applies fadditively manufactured scaffolds composed of hydroxyapatite-doped poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (HA-PELGA) with varying properties to treat rat calvarial defects, elucidating their significant role in bone remodeling by modulating physiological responses. We engineered two scaffolds with different polylactic acid (PLA) to polyglycolic acid (PGA) ratio (9/1 and 18/1) to vary in hydrophobicity, degradation rate, mechanical properties, and structural stability. These variations influenced physiological responses, including osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune reactions, thereby guiding bone remodeling. Our findings show that the HA-PELGA(18/1) scaffold, with a slower degradation rate, supported bulk bone formation due to a stable microenvironment. Conversely, the HA-PELGA(9/1) scaffold, with a faster degradation rate and more active interfaces, facilitated the formation of a thin bone layer and higher bone infiltration. This study demonstrates these degradable scaffolds help to promote bone healing and reveals how scaffold properties influence the bone remodeling process, offering a potential strategy to optimize scaffold design aiming at late-stage bone defect healing. Additively manufactured HA-PELGA scaffolds with tailored PLA/PGA ratios (9/1 and 18/1) are designed to enhance healing in critical-sized bone defects. • Revolutionary HA-PELGA scaffolds enhance late-stage cranial bone defect healing. • HA-PELGA(18/1) scaffolds enhance bone growth with a more stable surface condition. • HA-PELGA(9/1) scaffolds increase bone infiltration with a more active interface. • Scaffolds with varying L/G ratios modulate angiogenesis and immune responses.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects through BMP2 release from engineered poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels10.1038/s41598-024-55411-z ↗
2. Synthetic polymers as bone engineering scaffold10.1002/pat.6046 ↗
3. A critical review on polymer-based bio-engineered materials for scaffold development10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.014 ↗
4. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering: a literature review10.1002/jbm.b.33547 ↗
5. A review of fabrication polymer scaffolds for biomedical applications using additive manufacturing techniques10.1016/j.bbe.2020.01.015 ↗
6. A review of biomaterials in bone defect healing, remaining shortcomings and future opportunities for bone tissue engineering: the unsolved challenge10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0270.R1 ↗
7. Scaffold guided bone regeneration for the treatment of large segmental defects in long bones10.3390/biomedicines11020325 ↗
8. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
9. Hierarchically biomimetic bone scaffold materials: nano‐HA/collagen/PLA composite
10. Enabling technologies towards personalization of scaffolds for large bone defect regeneration10.1016/j.copbio.2021.12.002 ↗
11. Preparation of antibacterial and osteoconductive 3D-printed PLGA/Cu (I)@ ZIF-8 nanocomposite scaffolds for infected bone repair10.1186/s12951-020-00594-6 ↗
12. Recent advances in PLGA-based biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.067 ↗
13. Impact of simultaneous hydrolysis of OCP and PLGA on bone induction of a PLGA-OCP composite scaffold in a rat femoral defect10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.048 ↗
14. 3D-printed hydroxyapatite microspheres reinforced PLGA scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1016/j.msec.2021.112618 ↗
15. Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based composite bone-substitute materials
16. Controlled release of bioactive agents from lactide/glycolide polymers
17. In vitro degradation and release characteristics of biodegradable implants containing trypsin inhibitor
18. A preliminary study of the osteogenic potential of a biodegradable alloplastic-osteoinductive alloimplant10.1097/00003086-198812000-00036 ↗
19. Biodegradable implants for the treatment of osteochondral defects in a goat model10.1089/ten.1997.3.363 ↗
20. Composite bilayered scaffolds with bio-functionalized ceramics for cranial bone defects: an in vivo evaluation10.1088/2399-7532/aafc5b ↗
21. J. Zhou, C.W. See, S. Sreenivasamurthy, D. Zhu, Customized Additive Manufacturing in Bone Scaffolds—The Gateway to Precise Bone Defect Treatment, Research 6 0239.10.34133/research.0239 ↗
22. Evaluating 3D-printed biomaterials as scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue engineering10.1002/adma.201403943 ↗
23. Architectural design of 3D printed scaffolds controls the volume and functionality of newly formed bone10.1002/adhm.201801353 ↗
24. Adsorption force of fibronectin on various surface chemistries and its vital role in osteoblast adhesion10.1021/bm501873g ↗
25. Bioactive peptides grafted silicone dressings: a simple and specific method10.1016/j.mtchem.2017.02.007 ↗
26. Antibacterial and bioactive surface modifications of titanium implants by PCL/TiO2 nanocomposite coatings10.3390/nano8100860 ↗
27. Characterization of a homologous series of D, L-lactic acid oligomers; a mechanistic study on the degradation kinetics in vitro10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00243-6 ↗
28. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier10.3390/polym3031377 ↗
29. Customized design 3D printed PLGA/calcium sulfate scaffold enhances mechanical and biological properties for bone regeneration
30. Effects of oxygen plasma treatment on adipose-derived human mesenchymal stem cell adherence to poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds10.1163/156856207782246812 ↗
31. Effects of surface functional groups on protein adsorption and subsequent cell adhesion using self-assembled monolayers10.1039/b708099a ↗
32. Recommendation for modifying current cytotoxicity testing standards for biodegradable magnesium-based materials10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.011 ↗
33. The summary of the most important cell-biomaterial interactions that need to be considered during in vitro biocompatibility testing of bone scaffolds for tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.061 ↗
34. Vascular endothelial growth factors: biology and current status of clinical applications in cardiovascular medicine10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.053 ↗
35. CD31 and VEGF are prognostic biomarkers in early-stage, but not in late-stage, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma10.1186/s12885-018-4180-5 ↗
36. Macrophage phenotypes in tissue repair and the foreign body response: implications for biomaterial-based regenerative medicine strategies10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.038 ↗
37. Highly flexible silica/chitosan hybrid scaffolds with oriented pores for tissue regeneration10.1039/C5TB00767D ↗
38. Shape recovery with concomitant mechanical strengthening of amphiphilic shape memory polymers in warm water10.1021/acsami.6b14167 ↗
39. Unusual mechanical performance of amphiphilic crosslinked polymer networks10.1021/ja067986i ↗
40. An overview of poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering10.3390/ijms15033640 ↗
41. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
42. Engineered three-dimensional scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration in osteonecrosis
43. Antibacterial alginate/nano-hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering: assessment of their bioactivity, biocompatibility, and antibacterial activity10.1016/j.msec.2020.111101 ↗
44. Mineral distribution spatially patterns bone marrow stromal cell behavior on monolithic bone scaffolds10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.032 ↗
45. Electroactive composite scaffold with locally expressed osteoinductive factor for synergistic bone repair upon electrical stimulation10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119617 ↗
46. PLGA-based composites for various biomedical applications10.3390/ijms23042034 ↗
47. Bone tissue engineering techniques, advances, and scaffolds for treatment of bone defects10.1016/j.cobme.2020.100248 ↗
48. Bone flap resorption: risk factors for the development of a long-term complication following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy10.1089/neu.2012.2542 ↗
49. Cranial bone flap resorption—pathological features and their implications for clinical treatment10.1007/s10143-020-01417-w ↗
50. Bone physiology and biology10.1007/978-3-319-56192-9_2 ↗
51. The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080311.x ↗
52. Cross-talk between mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in bone regeneration10.3389/fcell.2021.674084 ↗
53. VEGF and BMP-2 promote bone regeneration by facilitating bone marrow stem cell homing and differentiation10.22203/eCM.v027a01 ↗
54. Hypoxia affects mesenchymal stromal cell osteogenic differentiation and angiogenic factor expression10.1016/j.bone.2006.11.024 ↗
55. Skeletal-vascular interactions in bone development, homeostasis, and pathological destruction10.3390/ijms241310912 ↗
56. The role of vasculature and angiogenic strategies in bone regeneration10.3390/biomimetics9020075 ↗
57. Osteoclasts and remodeling based bone formation10.2174/1574888X10666151019115724 ↗
58. Non-union bone fractures10.1038/s41572-021-00289-8 ↗
59. Time course of immune response and immunomodulation during normal and delayed healing of musculoskeletal wounds10.3389/fimmu.2020.01056 ↗