Gas Evolution in Lithium-Ion Batteries: Solid versus Liquid Electrolyte
Source abstract
Abstract
Gas evolution in conventional lithium-ion batteries using Ni-rich layered oxide cathode materials presents a serious issue that is responsible for performance decay and safety concerns, among others. Recent findings revealed that gas evolution also occurred in bulk-type solid-state batteries. To further clarify the effect that the electrolyte has on gassing, we report in this work—to the best of our knowledge—the first study comparing gas evolution in lithium-ion batteries with NCM622 cathode material and different electrolyte types, specifically solid (β-Li3PS4 and Li6PS5Cl) versus liquid (LP57). Using isotopic labeling, acid titration, and in situ gas analysis, we show the presence of O2 and CO2 evolution in both systems, albeit with different cumulative amounts, and possible SO2 evolution for the lithium thiophosphate-based cells. Our results demonstrate the importance of considering gas evolution in solid-state batteries, especially the formation and release of highly corrosive SO2, due to side reactions with the electrolyte.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Battery and Electrochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen 76344, Germany
BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, Ludwigshafen 67056, Germany
Institute of Physical Chemistry & Center for Materials Science, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, Giessen 35392, Germany
Funding
Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung · BASF
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nchem.208510.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0059410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00594 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.10.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.10.008 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.139182910.1149/1.1391829 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0192710.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01927 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.1151605jes10.1149/2.1151605jes ↗
7. 10.1007/s10008-016-3362-910.1007/s10008-016-3362-9 ↗
8. 10.1149/2.0021707jes10.1149/2.0021707jes ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.7b0846110.1021/jacs.7b08461 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0145710.1021/acsenergylett.8b01457 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0294710.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02947 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.8b1315810.1021/acsami.8b13158 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.08.00210.1016/j.elecom.2015.08.002 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b0123710.1021/acs.analchem.5b01237 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20180227710.1002/anie.201802277 ↗
16. 10.1002/cssc.20180135610.1002/cssc.201801356 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0021707jes10.1149/2.0021707jes ↗
18. 10.1039/C9CC04453A10.1039/C9CC04453A ↗
19. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0027510.1021/acsenergylett.8b00275 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0956910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09569 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0093110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00931 ↗
22. 10.1039/C9RA10253A10.1039/C9RA10253A ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0499010.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04990 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0077010.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00770 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b0807910.1021/acs.jpca.8b08079 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.03710.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.037 ↗
27. Sasaki, I.; Komori, T.; Honda, K.; Hibino, J. Enhancement of Rate Capability for All-Solid-State Batteries Using Surface Oxidized Sulfide Solid Electrolyte. AiMES 2018 Meeting; Cancun, Mexico; The Electrochemical Society: Pennington, NJ, 2018.10.1149/MA2018-02/5/306 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0408210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.5b0751710.1021/acsami.5b07517 ↗
30. 10.1149/2.1261811jes10.1149/2.1261811jes ↗