Smooth, All-Solid, Low-Hysteresis, Omniphobic Surfaces with Enhanced Mechanical Durability
Source abstract
Abstract
The utility of omniphobic surfaces stems from their ability to repel a multitude of liquids, possessing a broad range of surface tensions and polarities, by causing them to bead up and either roll or slide off. These surfaces may be self-cleaning, corrosion-resistant, heat-transfer enhancing, stain-resistant or resistant to mineral- or biofouling. The majority of reported omniphobic surfaces use texture, lubricants, and/or grafted monolayers to engender these repellent properties. Unfortunately, these approaches often produce surfaces with deficiencies in long-term stability, durability, scalability, or applicability to a wide range of substrates. To overcome these limitations, we have fabricated an all-solid, substrate-independent, smooth, omniphobic coating composed of a fluorinated polyurethane and fluorodecyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane. Liquids of varying surface tension, including water, hexadecane, ethanol, and silicone oil, exhibit low-contact-angle hysteresis (<15°) on these surfaces, allowing liquid droplets to slide off, leaving no residue. Moreover, we demonstrate that these robust surfaces retained their repellent properties more effectively than textured or lubricated omniphobic surfaces after being subjected to mechanical abrasion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Rocket Propulsion Division, Air Force Research Laboratory, Edwards Air Force Base, California 93524, United States
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Office of Naval Research Global
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/09506608.2015.111649210.1080/09506608.2015.1116492 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1044710.1038/nature10447 ↗
3. 10.1039/c2cp40581d10.1039/c2cp40581d ↗
4. 10.1063/1.368739810.1063/1.3687398 ↗
5. 10.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-14302810.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143028 ↗
6. 10.1557/mre.2014.910.1557/mre.2014.9 ↗
7. 10.1098/rstl.1805.000510.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00396-012-2796-610.1007/s00396-012-2796-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/0095-8522(62)90011-910.1016/0095-8522(62)90011-9 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.114832610.1126/science.1148326 ↗
11. 10.1039/tf944400054610.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
12. 10.1039/C3CS60415B10.1039/C3CS60415B ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.16610410.1103/PhysRevLett.105.166104 ↗
14. 10.1039/C5CS00438A10.1039/C5CS00438A ↗
15. 10.1021/am302541f10.1021/am302541f ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.06.03010.1016/j.jcis.2015.06.030 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.16830110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.168301 ↗
18. 10.1021/nn303867y10.1021/nn303867y ↗
19. 10.1039/C2SM27032C10.1039/C2SM27032C ↗
20. 10.1016/S1359-0294(03)00054-210.1016/S1359-0294(03)00054-2 ↗
21. 10.1021/la990074s10.1021/la990074s ↗
22. 10.1002/anie.20150938510.1002/anie.201509385 ↗
23. 10.1039/b920491a10.1039/b920491a ↗
24. 10.1021/la402714s10.1021/la402714s ↗
25. Hu H. · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 3
26. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0640410.1021/acsnano.5b06404 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20070535510.1002/anie.200705355 ↗
28. 10.1021/am100729j10.1021/am100729j ↗
29. 10.1039/c1sm05994g10.1039/c1sm05994g ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.12.04810.1016/j.jcis.2007.12.048 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.6b1549110.1021/acsami.6b15491 ↗
32. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199810)10:15<1197::AID-ADMA1197>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199810)10:15<1197::AID-ADMA1197>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
33. 10.1038/srep0415810.1038/srep04158 ↗
34. 10.1080/01694243.2014.93356310.1080/01694243.2014.933563 ↗