journal article·2011-01-26

Photoelectrochemical Characterization of Nanocrystalline Thin-Film Cu2ZnSnS4 Photocathodes

Shannon C. Riha, Sarah J. Fredrick, Justin B. Sambur, Yuejiao Liu, Amy L. Prieto, B. A. Parkinson

Publisher page

Abstract

Cu₂ZnSnS₄ (CZTS) nanocrystals, synthesized by a hot injection solution method, have been fabricated into thin films by dip-casting onto fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates. The photoresponse of the CZTS nanocrystal films was evaluated using absorbance measurements along with photoelectrochemical methods in aqueous electrolytes. Photoelectrochemical characterization revealed a p-type photoresponse when the films were illuminated in an aqueous Eu(3+) redox electrolyte. The effects of CZTS stoichiometry, film thickness, and low-temperature annealing on the photocurrents from front and back illumination suggest that the minority carrier diffusion and recombination at the back contact (via reaction of photogenerated holes with Eu(2+) produced from photoreduction by minority carriers) are the main loss mechanisms in the cell. Low-temperature annealing resulted in significant increases in the photocurrents for films made from both Zn-rich and stoichiometric CZTS nanocrystals.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States, and Department of Chemistry and School of Energy Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, United States

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Ginley D. · MRS Bull. · 2008 · 33 · 35510.1557/mrs2008.71 ↗
2. Scragg J. J. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2008 · 245 · 177210.1002/pssb.200879539 ↗
3. Wadia C. · J. Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 207210.1021/es8019534 ↗
4. Jimbo K. · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 599710.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.103 ↗
5. Katagiri H. · Thin Solid Films · 2005 · 480 · 42610.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.024 ↗
6. Katagiri H. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2001 · 65 · 14110.1016/S0927-0248(00)00088-X ↗
7. Katagiri H. · Appl. Phys. Express · 2008 · 1 · 04120110.1143/APEX.1.041201 ↗
8. Tanaka T. · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 2005 · 66 · 197810.1016/j.jpcs.2005.09.037 ↗
9. Kamoun N. · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 594910.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.144 ↗
10. Kumar Y. B. K. · Sol Energy Mater Sol. Cells · 2009 · 93 · 123010.1016/j.solmat.2009.01.011 ↗
11. Miyamoto Y. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 47 · 59610.1143/JJAP.47.596 ↗
12. Tanaka K. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 47 · 59810.1143/JJAP.47.598 ↗
13. Tanaka K. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2007 · 91 · 119910.1016/j.solmat.2007.04.012 ↗
14. Tanaka K. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2009 · 93 · 58310.1016/j.solmat.2008.12.009 ↗
15. Moriya K. · Phys. Status Solidi C · 2006 · 3 · 284810.1002/pssc.200669588 ↗
16. Fischereder A. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 339910.1021/cm100058q ↗
17. Chan C. P. · Proc. SPIE · 2009 · 7411 · 74110810.1117/12.828172 ↗
18. Ennaoui A. · Thin Solid Films · 2009 · 517 · 251110.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.061 ↗
19. Pawar S. M. · Electrochim. Acta · 2010 · 55 · 405710.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.051 ↗
20. Scragg J. J. · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2010 · 646 · 5210.1016/j.jelechem.2010.01.008 ↗
21. Scragg J. J. · Thin Solid Films · 2009 · 517 · 248110.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.022 ↗
22. Zhang X. · Appl. Phys. A · 2009 · 94 · 38110.1007/s00339-008-4815-5 ↗
23. Chan C. P. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2010 · 94 · 20710.1016/j.solmat.2009.09.003 ↗
24. Todorov T. K. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · E15610.1002/adma.200904155 ↗
25. Panthani M. G. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 1677010.1021/ja805845q ↗
26. Basol B. M. · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 1998 · 1 · 25210.1149/1.1390703 ↗
27. Koo B. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 313410.1021/ja8080605 ↗
28. Koo B. · Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 196210.1021/cm900363w ↗
29. Tang J. · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 690610.1021/cm801655w ↗
30. Riha S. C. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1205410.1021/ja9044168 ↗
31. Guo Q. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1167210.1021/ja904981r ↗
32. Shavel A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 451410.1021/ja909498c ↗
33. Steinhagen C. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1255410.1021/ja905922j ↗
34. Luther J. M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 348810.1021/nl802476m ↗
35. Kameyama T. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 531910.1039/c0jm00454e ↗
36. Peng X. G. · Nature · 2000 · 404 · 5910.1038/35003535 ↗
37. Peng Z. A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 124 · 334310.1021/ja0173167 ↗
38. Cushing B. L. · Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 104 · 389310.1021/cr030027b ↗
39. Milliron D. J. · Nature · 2004 · 430 · 19010.1038/nature02695 ↗
40. Yin Y. · Nature · 2004 · 437 · 66410.1038/nature04165 ↗
41. Liu Y. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 196010.1021/nl101284k ↗
42. Luther J. M. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 27110.1021/nn7003348 ↗
43. Law M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 597410.1021/ja800040c ↗
44. Smith B. · 1999
45. Ryan M. A. · J. Mater. Res. · 1987 · 2 · 52810.1557/JMR.1987.0528 ↗
46. Peter L. M. · Chem. Rev. · 1990 · 90 · 75310.1021/cr00103a005 ↗
47. Films of each thickness were prepared and tested in triplicate from three different reaction batches of both stoichiometric and Zn-rich compositions. All sets showed similar trends between front and back illumination, in addtion to the maximum current for films around 300 nm. However, the magnitude of the IPCE values or photocurrent was not consistent, therefore we did not show error bars in our figures.
48. Burke A. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 97710.1021/nl071588b ↗
49. Yu H. · Electrochim. Acta · 2009 · 54 · 131910.1016/j.electacta.2008.09.025 ↗