journal article·2019-11-06

PCL-MECM-Based Hydrogel Hybrid Scaffolds and Meniscal Fibrochondrocytes Promote Whole Meniscus Regeneration in a Rabbit Meniscectomy Model

Mingxue Chen, Zhaoxuan Feng, Weimin Guo, Dejin Yang, Shuang Gao, Yangyang Li, Shi Shen, Zhiguo Yuan, Bo Huang, Yu Zhang, Mingjie Wang, Xu Li, Libo Hao, Jiang Peng, Shuyun Liu, Yixin Zhou, Quanyi Guo

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 44
Publisher page

Abstract

Regeneration of an injured meniscus continues to be a scientific challenge due to its poor self-healing potential. Tissue engineering provides an avenue for regenerating a severely damaged meniscus. In this study, we first investigated the superiority of five concentrations (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%) of meniscus extracellular matrix (MECM)-based hydrogel in promoting cell proliferation and the matrix-forming phenotype of meniscal fibrochondrocytes (MFCs). We found that the 2% group strongly enhanced chondrogenic marker mRNA expression and cell proliferation compared to the other groups. Moreover, the 2% group showed the highest glycosaminoglycan (GAG) and collagen production by day 14. We then constructed a hybrid scaffold by 3D printing a wedge-shaped poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold as a backbone, followed by injection with the optimized MECM-based hydrogel (2%), which served as a cell delivery system. The hybrid scaffold (PCL-hydrogel) clearly yielded favorable biomechanical properties close to those of the native meniscus. Finally, PCL scaffold, PCL-hydrogel, and MFCs-loaded hybrid scaffold (PCL-hydrogel-MFCs) were implanted into the knee joints of New Zealand rabbits that underwent total medial meniscectomy. Six months postimplantation we found that the PCL-hydrogel-MFCs group exhibited markedly better gross appearance and cartilage protection than the PCL scaffold and PCL-hydrogel groups. Moreover, the regenerated menisci in the PCL-hydrogel-MFCs group had similar histological structures, biochemical contents, and biomechanical properties as the native menisci in the sham operation group. In conclusion, PCL-MECM-based hydrogel hybrid scaffold seeded with MFCs can successfully promote whole meniscus regeneration, and cell-loaded PCL-MECM-based hydrogel hybrid scaffold may be a promising strategy for meniscus regeneration in the future.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing Key Lab of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Trauma & War Injuries PLA, Institute of Orthopedics, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, People’s Republic of China

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, No. 31 Xinjiekou East Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100035, People’s Republic of China

School of Material Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, No. 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Second Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, People’s Republic of China

Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China

Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping Road, Luzhou 646000, People’s Republic of China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/00003086-197506000-0002710.1097/00003086-197506000-00027 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.05510.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.055 ↗
3. 10.1002/ca.2245610.1002/ca.22456 ↗
4. 10.1302/0301-620X.98B7.3741010.1302/0301-620X.98B7.37410 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41578-018-0023-x10.1038/s41578-018-0023-x ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms493510.1038/ncomms4935 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.017 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.01210.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.012 ↗
10. 10.3390/ma1001002910.3390/ma10010029 ↗
11. 10.1039/C6BM00863A10.1039/C6BM00863A ↗
12. 10.1007/s12033-018-0084-510.1007/s12033-018-0084-5 ↗
13. 10.1155/2016/471718410.1155/2016/4717184 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.02210.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.022 ↗
15. 10.1177/036354651769151310.1177/0363546517691513 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joca.2003.11.00310.1016/j.joca.2003.11.003 ↗
17. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.012 ↗
19. 10.1177/036354651667418410.1177/0363546516674184 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.04610.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.046 ↗
21. 10.1371/journal.pone.009166210.1371/journal.pone.0091662 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.aav905110.1126/science.aav9051 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41578-018-0027-610.1038/s41578-018-0027-6 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.08.00910.1016/j.matbio.2014.08.009 ↗
26. 10.4161/cam.5.3.1446310.4161/cam.5.3.14463 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00441-017-2605-010.1007/s00441-017-2605-0 ↗
28. 10.5301/jabfm.500030210.5301/jabfm.5000302 ↗
29. 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.054510.1089/ten.tea.2013.0545 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.05810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.058 ↗
31. 10.1002/jbm.a.3219810.1002/jbm.a.32198 ↗
32. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/02810.1088/0957-4484/16/10/028 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.017 ↗
34. 10.1155/2015/51752010.1155/2015/517520 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41584-019-0255-110.1038/s41584-019-0255-1 ↗
36. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao075010.1126/scitranslmed.aao0750 ↗
37. Abedalwafa M. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 34 · 123
38. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.057210.1089/ten.tea.2011.0572 ↗
39. 10.1186/ar445510.1186/ar4455 ↗
40. 10.1177/036354651559506510.1177/0363546515595065 ↗
41. 10.1177/036354651562491310.1177/0363546515624913 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.joca.2008.02.01910.1016/j.joca.2008.02.019 ↗
43. 10.1126/scitranslmed.300969610.1126/scitranslmed.3009696 ↗
44. 10.1002/art.3809910.1002/art.38099 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.01.00610.1016/j.arthro.2005.01.006 ↗
46. 10.1155/2018/531047110.1155/2018/5310471 ↗
47. 10.1177/036354651882007610.1177/0363546518820076 ↗
48. 10.1155/2015/92632510.1155/2015/926325 ↗
49. 10.1186/s13287-016-0301-810.1186/s13287-016-0301-8 ↗
50. 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.031710.1089/ten.tea.2016.0317 ↗
51. 10.1002/jbm.a.3090410.1002/jbm.a.30904 ↗
52. Lu H. D. · Chin J. Traumatol · 2011 · 14 · 195
53. 10.1177/036354650629066610.1177/0363546506290666 ↗
54. 10.1007/s00402-005-0100-710.1007/s00402-005-0100-7 ↗