journal article·2020-03-04Open access

Targeting Pathogenic Biofilms: Newly Developed Superhydrophobic Coating Favors a Host-Compatible Microbial Profile on the Titanium Surface

João G. S. Souza, Martinna Bertolini, Raphael C. Costa, Jairo M. Cordeiro, Bruna E. Nagay, Amanda B. de Almeida, Belén Retamal-Valdes, Francisco H. Nociti, Magda Feres, Elidiane C. Rangel, Valentim A. R. Barão

Abstract

Polymicrobial infections are one of the most common reasons for inflammation of surrounding tissues and failure of implanted biomaterials. Because microorganism adhesion is the first step for biofilm formation, physical–chemical modifications of biomaterials have been proposed to reduce the initial microbial attachment. Thus, the use of superhydrophobic coatings has emerged because of their anti-biofilm properties. However, these coatings on the titanium (Ti) surface have been developed mainly by dual-step surface modification techniques and have not been tested using polymicrobial biofilms. Therefore, we developed a one-step superhydrophobic coating on the Ti surface by using a low-pressure plasma technology to create a biocompatible coating that reduces polymicrobial biofilm adhesion and formation. The superhydrophobic coating on Ti was created by the glow discharge plasma using Ar, O2, and hexamethyldisiloxane gases, and after full physical, chemical, and biological characterizations, we evaluated its properties regarding oral biofilm inhibition. The newly developed coating presented an increased surface roughness and, consequently, superhydrophobicity (contact angle over 150°) and enhanced corrosion resistance (p < 0.05) of the Ti surface. Furthermore, proteomic analysis showed a unique pattern of protein adsorption on the superhydrophobic coating without drastically changing the biologic processes mediated by proteins. Additionally, superhydrophobic treatment did not present a cytotoxic effect on fibroblasts or reduction of proliferation; however, it significantly reduced (≈8-fold change) polymicrobial adhesion (bacterial and fungal) and biofilm formation in vitro. Interestingly, superhydrophobic coating shifted the microbiological profile of biofilms formed in situ in the oral cavity, reducing by up to ≈7 fold pathogens associated with the peri-implant disease. Thus, this new superhydrophobic coating developed by a one-step glow discharge plasma technique is a promising biocompatible strategy to drastically reduce microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on Ti-based biomedical implants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dental Trauma and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 901 Limeira Avenue, Piracicaba, São Paulo 13414-903, Brazil

Department of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States

Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University, 88 Eng. Prestes Maia Street, Guarulhos, São Paulo 07023-070, Brazil

Laboratory of Technological Plasmas, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), 511 Três de Março Avenue, Sorocaba, São Paulo 18087-180, Brazil

Funding

Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa do Estado de S?o Paulo · Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11837-008-0031-110.1007/s11837-008-0031-1 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma509152810.3390/ma5091528 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.05.02810.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.05.028 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.00710.1016/j.cis.2010.12.007 ↗
5. 10.1128/mmbr.00014-0910.1128/mmbr.00014-09 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y ↗
7. 10.1002/jper.17-073910.1002/jper.17-0739 ↗
8. 10.1111/clr.1277010.1111/clr.12770 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01673.x10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01673.x ↗
10. 10.1038/nrmicro241510.1038/nrmicro2415 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.06210.1016/j.msec.2015.12.062 ↗
12. 10.3390/ma1112249510.3390/ma11122495 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.05810.1016/j.msec.2019.02.058 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.01.03510.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.01.035 ↗
15. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.9910.1038/nrmicro.2017.99 ↗
16. 10.1177/002203451558769010.1177/0022034515587690 ↗
17. 10.1128/aem.02839-0710.1128/aem.02839-07 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.050 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.03.01910.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.03.019 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-019-43386-110.1038/s41598-019-43386-1 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.7b0597710.1021/acsami.7b05977 ↗
22. 10.1080/08927014.2012.69442610.1080/08927014.2012.694426 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20120379710.1002/adma.201203797 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.00810.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.008 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0133310.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01333 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.9b1783610.1021/acsami.9b17836 ↗
27. 10.1039/c3ra40497h10.1039/c3ra40497h ↗
28. 10.1021/la104607g10.1021/la104607g ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.06110.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.061 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.02.00810.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.02.008 ↗
31. 10.1080/08927014.2019.158036010.1080/08927014.2019.1580360 ↗
32. 10.1002/jper.18-017810.1002/jper.18-0178 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.05.02810.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.05.028 ↗
34. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02265.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02265.x ↗
35. 10.1902/jop.2010.09072910.1902/jop.2010.090729 ↗
36. 10.1080/08927014.2018.155715110.1080/08927014.2018.1557151 ↗
37. 10.1128/cmr.17.2.255-267.200410.1128/cmr.17.2.255-267.2004 ↗
38. 10.1159/00049403310.1159/000494033 ↗
39. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/007625-010.1099/mic.0.2007/007625-0 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.00810.1016/j.tim.2017.09.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.01210.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.012 ↗
42. 10.1002/jper.18-021910.1002/jper.18-0219 ↗
43. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01566.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01566.x ↗
44. Socransky S. S. · Biotechniques · 1994 · 17 · 788
45. 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01538.x10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01538.x ↗
46. 10.1097/01.mao.0000169767.85549.8710.1097/01.mao.0000169767.85549.87 ↗
47. 10.1302/0301-620x.79b5.079081610.1302/0301-620x.79b5.0790816 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.9b0331110.1021/acsami.9b03311 ↗
49. 10.1116/1.360452810.1116/1.3604528 ↗
50. 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01561.x10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01561.x ↗
51. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.02510.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.025 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.05.00810.1016/j.corsci.2011.05.008 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.02810.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.028 ↗
54. 10.3390/ma1006062810.3390/ma10060628 ↗
55. 10.1038/nri118010.1038/nri1180 ↗
56. 10.1002/2211-5463.1259110.1002/2211-5463.12591 ↗
57. 10.1039/c1sm05838j10.1039/c1sm05838j ↗
58. 10.1021/la200136t10.1021/la200136t ↗
59. 10.1039/c002321c10.1039/c002321c ↗
60. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.041 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.05.00310.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.05.003 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.001 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.08110.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.081 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.05.00610.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.05.006 ↗
65. 10.1177/002203451558769010.1177/0022034515587690 ↗
66. 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1993.tb00573.x10.1111/j.1399-302x.1993.tb00573.x ↗
67. 10.1371/journal.ppat.100771710.1371/journal.ppat.1007717 ↗