Antibacterial Adhesion of Borneol-Based Polymer via Surface Chiral Stereochemistry
Source abstract
Abstract
During its adhesion on external surfaces, a cell exhibits obvious inclination to different molecular chirality, which encourages us to develop a new type of antibacterial material catering to the "chiral taste" of bacteria. On the basis of the natural product borneol (a camphane-type bicyclic monoterpene), a series of borneol-based polymer, polyborneolacrylate (PBA), was successfully prepared and showed superior antibacterial adhesion properties resulting from the borneol isomers on material surface. The results of this study reveal that bacteria simply dislike this type of stubborn surface of PBA, and the PBA surface stereochemistry contributes to the interfacial antibacterial activities. The PBA polymers were evaluated as noncytotoxic and can be simply synthesized, demonstrating their great potential for biomedical applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial agents and applications · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, P. R. China
Department of Chemistry and the Tsinghua Center for Frontier Polymer Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · Natural Science Foundation of Beijing
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Banerjee I. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 69010.1002/adma.201001215 ↗
2. Glinel K. · Acta Biomater. · 2012 · 8 · 167010.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.011 ↗
3. Renner L. D. · MRS Bull. · 2011 · 36 · 34710.1557/mrs.2011.65 ↗
4. Wong G. C. L. · MRS Bull. · 2011 · 36 · 33910.1557/mrs.2011.64 ↗
5. Neu T. R. · Microbiol. Rev. · 1996 · 60 · 15110.1128/mr.60.1.151-166.1996 ↗
6. Lejars M. · Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 434710.1021/cr200350v ↗
7. Hetrick E. M. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2006 · 35 · 78010.1039/b515219b ↗
8. Rai M. · Biotechnol. Adv. · 2009 · 27 · 7610.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 ↗
9. Tu Y. S. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 59410.1038/nnano.2013.125 ↗
10. Zhou H. · Int. J. Oral Sci. · 2014 · 1
11. Haug B. E. · Curr. Med. Chem. · 2007 · 14 · 110.2174/092986707779313435 ↗
12. Kristensen J. B. · Biotechnol. Adv. · 2008 · 26 · 47110.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.05.005 ↗
13. Wang L. · J. Agric. Food Chem. · 2011 · 59 · 1241110.1021/jf203165k ↗
14. Guaní-Guerra E. · Clin. Immunol. · 2010 · 135 · 110.1016/j.clim.2009.12.004 ↗
15. García-Fernández L. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 52910.1002/adma.201203362 ↗
16. Salditt T. · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 2006 · 1758 · 148310.1016/j.bbamem.2006.08.002 ↗
17. Kalemba D. · Curr. Med. Chem. · 2003 · 10 · 81310.2174/0929867033457719 ↗
18. Ait-Ouazzou A. · Innovative Food Sci. Emerging Technol. · 2011 · 12 · 32010.1016/j.ifset.2011.04.004 ↗
19. Hanein D. · Science · 1994 · 263 · 141310.1126/science.8128221 ↗
20. Sun T. L. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2011 · 40 · 290910.1039/c0cs00124d ↗
21. Wang X. · Soft Matter · 2010 · 6 · 385110.1039/c0sm00151a ↗
22. Wang X. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 327610.1002/adfm.201101032 ↗
23. Wang X. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 279110.1021/la204143g ↗
24. Granger R. E. · Biochem. Pharmacol. · 2005 · 69 · 110110.1016/j.bcp.2005.01.002 ↗
25. Dorman H. J. D. · J. Appl. Microbiol. · 2000 · 88 · 30810.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00969.x ↗
26. Mai L. M. · Biomaterials · 2003 · 24 · 300510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00126-1 ↗
27. Speranza G. · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 202910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.061 ↗
28. Hook A. L. · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2012 · 30 · 86810.1038/nbt.2316 ↗
29. El-Gindi J. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2012 · 51 · 371610.1002/anie.201109144 ↗
30. Bruinsma G. M. · Biomaterials · 2001 · 22 · 321710.1016/S0142-9612(01)00159-4 ↗
31. Hu W. B. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 431710.1021/nn101097v ↗