Electroless Deposition of Cu on Glass and Patterning with Microcontact Printing
Source abstract
Abstract
Electroless-depositing a metal from solution to a substrate and patterning it using microcontact printing is an alternative to the conventional patterning of vacuum-deposited metals using photolithography. Here, we pattern Cu onto 15 × 15 sq-inch glass substrates by (i) self-assembly of a thin layer of amino-derivatized silanes to the glass, (ii) binding Pd/Sn catalytic particles to the silanes, (iii) electroless deposition of ∼120 nm of Cu on the catalytic surface, (iv) microcontact printing hexadecanethiol on the Cu film using an accurate printing tool, and (v) selectively etching the printed Cu using hexadecanethiol as a resist. This method is particularly attractive for the fabrication of metallic gates for thin-film transistor liquid-crystal displays.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IBM Research, Zurich Research Laboratory, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland, and Advanced Display Technology Laboratory, IBM Research, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Electroless Plating · 1990
2. Kumar A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1993 · 63 · 2004
3. Xia Y. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 1998 · 37 · 575
4. Kumar A. · Langmuir · 1994 · 10 · 1511
5. Jeon N. L. · Langmuir · 1997 · 13 · 3391
6. Tate J. · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 606010.1021/la991646b ↗
7. Hidber P. C. · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 1380
8. Xia Y. · Langmuir · 1998 · 14 · 371
9. Zschieschang U.
10. Rogers J. A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2001 · 98 · 4840
11. Mach P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 359410.1063/1.1377312 ↗
12. Kagan C. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 353810.1063/1.1420576 ↗
13. Loo Y.-L. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2002 · 99 · 10256
14. Loo Y.-L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 564
15. Colgan E. G. · IBM J. Res. Dev. · 1998 · 42 · 444
16. Geissler M. · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 237710.1021/la0155909 ↗
17. Fryer P. M. · J. Soc. Inf. Disp. · 1997 · 5 · 5210.1889/1.1985124 ↗
18. Krishnamoorthy A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 246910.1063/1.1365418 ↗
19. Bindra P. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1985 · 132 · 258910.1149/1.2113628 ↗
20. Dobisz E. A. · J. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 48010.1063/1.1538350 ↗
21. Chen M.-S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1999 · 146 · 1430
22. Chen M.-S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2000 · 147 · 2610
23. Kind H. · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 6373
24. Duffy J. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1983 · 130 · 88010.1149/1.2119847 ↗
25. Parker K. · Plating · 1971 · 58 · 236
26. An · IBM J. Res. Dev. · 1993 · 37
27. Rogers J. A. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 1998 · 16 · 97
28. Schmid H. · Macromolecules · 2000 · 33 · 304910.1021/ma982034l ↗
29. Michel B. · IBM J. Res. Dev. · 2001 · 45 · 71910.1147/rd.455.0697 ↗
30. Bietsch A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 88 · 431810.1063/1.1289816 ↗
31. Delamarche E. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 333410.1021/jp980556x ↗