journal article·2023-11-21

Quasi-2D Model to Predict Solid Microstructure in Drying Thin Films

Jesse L. Starger, Aaron T. Fafarman, Jason B. Baxter, Nicolas J. Alvarez, Richard A. Cairncross

Langmuir· Volume 39· Issue 46
Publisher page

Abstract

The microstructure of solid coatings produced by solution processing is highly dependent on the coupling between growth, solute diffusion, and solvent evaporation. Here, a quasi-2D numerical model coupling drying and solidification is used to predict the transient lateral growth of two adjacent nuclei growing toward each other. Lateral gradients of the solute and solvent influence the evolution of film thickness and solid growth rate. The important process parameters and solvent properties are captured by the dimensionless Peclet number ( Pe ) and the Biot number ( Bi ), modified by an aspect ratio defined by the film thickness and distance between nuclei. By variation of Pe and Bi, the evaporation dynamics and aspect ratio are shown to largely determine the coating quality. These findings are applied to drying thin films of crystallizing halide perovskites, demonstrating a convenient process map for capturing the relationship between the modified Bi and well-defined coating regimes, which may be generalized for any solution-processed thin film coating systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Optical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States

Funding

Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja01167a00110.1021/ja01167a001 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.175038010.1063/1.1750380 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.175063110.1063/1.1750631 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.175087210.1063/1.1750872 ↗
5. 10.1515/zpch-1925-1151910.1515/zpch-1925-11519 ↗
6. 10.1515/zpch-1926-1192710.1515/zpch-1926-11927 ↗
7. Gilbert E. N. · 1962 · 33 · 958
8. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0127310.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01273 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0031810.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00318 ↗
10. 10.1039/C4EE03907F10.1039/C4EE03907F ↗
11. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10029310.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100293 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0184310.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01843 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-022-01096-510.1038/s41560-022-01096-5 ↗
14. Rahaman M. N. · 2003
15. 10.1021/la026751r10.1021/la026751r ↗
16. 10.1038/3982710.1038/39827 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.75610.1103/PhysRevE.62.756 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0312010.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03120 ↗
19. Cussler, E. L. Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, New York, 2009; p 226389413.10.1017/CBO9780511805134 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20190158110.1002/aenm.201901581 ↗
21. Bird R. B. · 2007
22. 10.1021/acsami.1c2236310.1021/acsami.1c22363 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.aaa676010.1126/science.aaa6760 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0190610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01906 ↗
25. The MathWorks. MATLAB Mathematics, 2022; p 708.
26. 10.1006/jcph.1994.113510.1006/jcph.1994.1135 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cep.2010.12.01210.1016/j.cep.2010.12.012 ↗
28. Mullin J. W. · 2001
29. 10.1021/cg300413s10.1021/cg300413s ↗
30. 10.1038/s41526-019-0085-010.1038/s41526-019-0085-0 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0265123410.1007/BF02651234 ↗
32. 10.1002/nme.142310.1002/nme.1423 ↗
33. 10.1557/adv.2019.14510.1557/adv.2019.145 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0105710.1021/acsenergylett.7b01057 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0346510.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03465 ↗
36. 10.1126/sciadv.aax753710.1126/sciadv.aax7537 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0432710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04327 ↗
38. 10.3390/cryst710029110.3390/cryst7100291 ↗
39. 10.1002/aenm.20180358710.1002/aenm.201803587 ↗
40. 10.1038/ncomms1604510.1038/ncomms16045 ↗
41. 10.1039/C9TA11245F10.1039/C9TA11245F ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0269110.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02691 ↗