journal article·2023-03-13Open access

Investigation of Reactive Silver Ink Formula for Reduced Silver Consumption in Silicon Heterojunction Metallization

Steven J. DiGregorio, Michael Martinez-Szewczyk, Subbarao Raikar, Mariana I. Bertoni, Owen J. Hildreth

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 6· Issue 5

Abstract

Silver is the most expensive non-silicon component in photovoltaic cells. This is particularly salient for silicon heterojunction (SHJ) cells, which rely on large quantities of low-temperature silver pastes (LT-SP). SHJ cells would benefit greatly from an industrially scalable metallization process that simultaneously offers low silver consumption, low finger resistivities (<20 μΩ·cm), and low processing temperatures. Printed reactive silver inks (RSI) are an innovative candidate to this end. This work furthers the research on RSI metallization by investigating the impact of ink formula on properties pertinent to SHJ cells, including electrical properties, line width, ink splatter, silver consumption, cell performance, and adhesion. We introduce a scalable, high-throughput flexible needle contact printing approach for metallization that solves many of the issues associated with drop-on-demand printing. The printed silver fingers are characterized using electrical measurements and top-down and cross-sectional microscopy. The best performing ink, consisting of silver acetate, ethylamine, and formic acid, achieved silver fingers with total resistivities of 3.1 μΩ·cm and contact resistivities of 3.2 mΩ·cm 2 when printed at 61 °C. This ink metallized a full-sized 156 mm × 156 mm SHJ cell. This is the first reported data for RSI metallization of a full-sized SHJ cell and shows how an optimized RSI can achieve similar performances to LT-SP while consuming 80–90% less silver.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

Arizona State University, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, 650 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C6EE00484A10.1039/C6EE00484A ↗
2. 10.1039/C5EE03380B10.1039/C5EE03380B ↗
3. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3210.1038/nenergy.2017.32 ↗
4. 10.1515/green-2011-001810.1515/green-2011-0018 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.07.01810.1016/j.solmat.2018.07.018 ↗
6. 10.1002/pip.284710.1002/pip.2847 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.02610.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.026 ↗
8. 10.1109/HONET.2012.642144410.1109/HONET.2012.6421444 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10854-018-9970-710.1007/s10854-018-9970-7 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.476452910.1063/1.4764529 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.07410.1016/j.solener.2018.01.074 ↗
12. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.262135110.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2621351 ↗
13. Jeffries A. M. · 2019
14. DiGregorio Steven J. · 2023 · 12510.1016/B978-0-323-91145-0.00011-6 ↗
15. 10.1002/admi.20190100210.1002/admi.201901002 ↗
16. 10.1039/C9TC05463D10.1039/C9TC05463D ↗
17. 10.1021/am403630610.1021/am4036306 ↗
18. 10.1021/am400812e10.1021/am400812e ↗
19. 10.1007/s10853-018-3017-610.1007/s10853-018-3017-6 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11090010.1016/j.solmat.2020.110900 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20220001510.1002/aenm.202200015 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja209267c10.1021/ja209267c ↗
23. 10.1149/1.208682510.1149/1.2086825 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cis.2017.12.00810.1016/j.cis.2017.12.008 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.5b0812510.1021/acsami.5b08125 ↗
26. 10.1039/C6TC02751B10.1039/C6TC02751B ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.06.01010.1016/j.tsf.2017.06.010 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.18710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.187 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10854-021-05347-110.1007/s10854-021-05347-1 ↗
30. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab85ef10.1088/1361-6528/ab85ef ↗
31. Mamidanna, A. Morphology Prediction of Reactive Silver Ink Systems. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines. Arthur Lakes Library, 2019. (accessed 2020-03-27).
32. 10.1002/pssa.20160015010.1002/pssa.201600150 ↗
33. 10.1021/ie50448a02210.1021/ie50448a022 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.06.00110.1016/j.tsf.2015.06.001 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10853-020-05140-110.1007/s10853-020-05140-1 ↗
36. 10.3390/mi1107067710.3390/mi11070677 ↗
37. 10.1109/ICEPT.2017.804671310.1109/ICEPT.2017.8046713 ↗
38. 10.1364/OE.25.01178810.1364/OE.25.011788 ↗
39. 10.1002/aic.69006010710.1002/aic.690060107 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.35058010.1063/1.350580 ↗
41. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.289689810.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2896898 ↗
42. 10.1109/6040.74653610.1109/6040.746536 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0402510.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04025 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0124910.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01249 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10854-021-06681-010.1007/s10854-021-06681-0 ↗
46. 10.1039/D0TC03864D10.1039/D0TC03864D ↗
47. 10.1038/s41598-022-25080-x10.1038/s41598-022-25080-x ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.12.01010.1016/j.jiec.2020.12.010 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0010710.1021/acsaelm.1c00107 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11097310.1016/j.solmat.2021.110973 ↗
51. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.258379210.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2583792 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10094510.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100945 ↗
53. 10.1002/chem.20200486010.1002/chem.202004860 ↗