journal article·2021-02-22

PAN-Based Triblock Copolymers Tailor-Made by Reversible Addition–Fragmentation Chain Transfer Polymerization for High-Performance Quasi-Solid State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Kyeong Min Kim, Masud, Jung-Min Ji, Hwan Kyu Kim

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

For efficient polymer gel electrolytes (PGEs) in quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells (QSS-DSSCs), six ABA triblock copolymers based on (poly(acrylonitrile-co-N-(isobutoxymethyl)acrylamide)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(acrylonitrile-co-N-(isobuto-xymethyl)acrylamide)) (P(AN-co-BMAAm)-b-PEG-b-P(AN-co-BMAAm)) with various copolymer compositions and molecular weights, coded as SGT-605, SGT-606, SGT-608, SGT-609, SGT-611, and SGT-612, have been synthesized by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization using PEG-functionalized macro-RAFT agents. The effects of copolymer compositions and molecular weights in P(AN-co-BMAAm)-b-PEG-b-P(AN-co-BMAAm) triblock copolymers were investigated in terms of electrochemical properties and photovoltaic performance as PGEs. The ionic conductivity was increased with N-(isobutoxymethyl)acrylamide (BMAAm) composition of these triblock copolymers, which is attributed to the availability of free iodide ions by complex formation among acrylamide groups with Li+ ions. However, polymer gel electrolytes with high molecular weights enhance ionic conductivity due to the lower amount of polymers required for the gel formation. Thus, the photovoltaic performances of PGE-based QSS-DSSCs improved along with the increase in the molecular weight of the triblock copolymer. The addition of 7 wt % TiO2 nanofiller into PGEs produced a higher ionic conductivity and diffusion of I3– than the corresponding PGEs. The resulting power conversion efficiency (PCE) of QSS-DSSCs using SGT-612/TiO2 composite PGEs under simulated 1-sun condition was 9.83% (Voc, 792.8 mV; Jsc, 16.65 mA/cm2; FF, 74.52%), which was higher than that of liquid electrolyte DSSCs (PCE 9.53%; Voc, 743.8 mV; Jsc, 17.16 mA/cm2; FF, 74.64%). The long-term device stability of PGE-based QSS-DSSCs was better than the liquid-state DSSCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Global GET-Future Lab., Department of Advanced Materials Chemistry, Korea University, Sejong 339-700, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr900356p10.1021/cr900356p ↗
2. 10.1016/0146-5724(84)90144-410.1016/0146-5724(84)90144-4 ↗
3. 10.1186/s11671-018-2760-610.1186/s11671-018-2760-6 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1389-5567(03)00026-110.1016/S1389-5567(03)00026-1 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solener.2015.02.04310.1016/j.solener.2015.02.043 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0044410.1021/acsaem.8b00444 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.09.00710.1016/j.dyepig.2016.09.007 ↗
8. 10.3390/nano1001002910.3390/nano10010029 ↗
9. 10.1039/C5CC06759F10.1039/C5CC06759F ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20200012410.1002/aenm.202000124 ↗
11. 10.1039/C4EE01724B10.1039/C4EE01724B ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.08610.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.086 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0559110.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05591 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12495410.1016/j.cej.2020.124954 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0240610.1021/acsaem.9b02406 ↗
16. 10.1021/cr400675m10.1021/cr400675m ↗
17. 10.33805/2576-8484.13010.33805/2576-8484.130 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.12810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.128 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.00910.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.009 ↗
20. 10.1039/c3ta11331k10.1039/c3ta11331k ↗
21. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.04810.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.048 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20060062110.1002/adfm.200600621 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.10.02410.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.10.024 ↗
24. 10.1295/polymj.24.84110.1295/polymj.24.841 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2004.07.00410.1016/j.materresbull.2004.07.004 ↗
26. 10.1021/j100047a00310.1021/j100047a003 ↗
27. 10.1038/nmat90410.1038/nmat904 ↗
28. 10.1021/sc300153b10.1021/sc300153b ↗
29. 10.1039/c3cp50170a10.1039/c3cp50170a ↗
30. 10.1002/anie.20130742310.1002/anie.201307423 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.02310.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.023 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0175310.1021/acs.macromol.8b01753 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11742810.1016/j.memsci.2019.117428 ↗
34. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020816)14:16<1134::AID-ADMA1134>3.0.CO;2-K10.1002/1521-4095(20020816)14:16<1134::AID-ADMA1134>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
35. 10.1021/nl025798u10.1021/nl025798u ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.04710.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.047 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2009.07.01410.1016/j.jphotochem.2009.07.014 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0927-0248(01)00019-810.1016/S0927-0248(01)00019-8 ↗
39. 10.1039/C9TA01907C10.1039/C9TA01907C ↗
40. 10.1149/1.321195410.1149/1.3211954 ↗
41. 10.1039/c2ra20177a10.1039/c2ra20177a ↗
42. 10.1021/ma062954110.1021/ma0629541 ↗
43. 10.1021/ma980495110.1021/ma9804951 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.08710.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.087 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.crci.2005.05.02110.1016/j.crci.2005.05.021 ↗
46. Chan S. · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2015 · 10 · 769610.1016/S1452-3981(23)17382-2 ↗
47. 10.1002/pola.2780610.1002/pola.27806 ↗
48. 10.1002/pola.2189910.1002/pola.21899 ↗
49. 10.1002/pola.2648810.1002/pola.26488 ↗
50. 10.1021/ma070424e10.1021/ma070424e ↗
51. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.07.03810.1016/j.orgel.2012.07.038 ↗
52. 10.1149/1.183717110.1149/1.1837171 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.09910.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.099 ↗
54. 10.1021/jp052768h10.1021/jp052768h ↗
55. 10.1039/b310907k10.1039/b310907k ↗
56. 10.1021/jp903764910.1021/jp9037649 ↗
57. 10.1039/b208388b10.1039/b208388b ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.06210.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.062 ↗
59. 10.1039/C8TA01729H10.1039/C8TA01729H ↗
60. 10.1021/acsami.0c0951910.1021/acsami.0c09519 ↗