Commercial Carbon-Based all-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells with a High Efficiency of 13.81%: Interface Engineering and Photovoltaic Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
The past few years have witnessed the rapid development of all-inorganic perovskite solar cells (PSCs). The interface of the electron transport layer (ETL)/perovskite is the vital charge separation site in all-inorganic PSCs. In this study, TiO2 nanorod arrays (NAs) were employed as electron transport layers in CsPbI2.25Br0.75 perovskite solar cells for enhancing the photovoltaic performance. Commercially available carbon was also used instead of the expensive hole transport materials and noble metals. The interface of TiO2/perovskite was further modified with cesium acetate (CsAc) to reduce the interface defect and the carrier recombination. The surface morphology, crystal structure, photoelectric property, and photovoltaic performance of the solar device were systematically investigated. More importantly, the device based on the CsAc-modified ETL/perovskite interface produced an optimization efficiency of 13.81%, which represents a record-breaking power conversion efficiency for carbon-based all-inorganic PSCs to date. This study emphasizes the critical importance of interface engineering of the ETL/perovskite and opens the door to the fabrication of carbon-based all-inorganic PSCs with high efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University (former Nanjing University of Technology), Nanjing 210009, P.R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
2. NREL. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. (accessed 2021-01-04).10.1055/a-1255-7390 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.122860410.1126/science.1228604 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature1234010.1038/nature12340 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1250910.1038/nature12509 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja411509g10.1021/ja411509g ↗
7. 10.1126/science.125405010.1126/science.1254050 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aaa927210.1126/science.aaa9272 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature2387710.1038/nature23877 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586-019-1036-310.1038/s41586-019-1036-3 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41566-019-0398-210.1038/s41566-019-0398-2 ↗
12. 10.1021/ic401215x10.1021/ic401215x ↗
13. 10.1021/jz402016210.1021/jz4020162 ↗
14. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.15210.1038/nenergy.2016.152 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5TA06398A10.1039/C5TA06398A ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0259710.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02597 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20160529010.1002/adma.201605290 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20191080010.1002/anie.201910800 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0096810.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00968 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10428610.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104286 ↗
21. 10.1002/solr.20200022610.1002/solr.202000226 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12490310.1016/j.cej.2020.124903 ↗
23. 10.1002/solr.20190036310.1002/solr.201900363 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.00410.1016/j.joule.2018.05.004 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-018-06915-610.1038/s41467-018-06915-6 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0185110.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01851 ↗
27. 10.1039/C8CC05444D10.1039/C8CC05444D ↗
28. 10.1126/science.aag270010.1126/science.aag2700 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20150245810.1002/aenm.201502458 ↗
30. 10.1039/C5SC04845A10.1039/C5SC04845A ↗
31. 10.1002/solr.20190025410.1002/solr.201900254 ↗
32. 10.1038/nature2598910.1038/nature25989 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20170539310.1002/adma.201705393 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.aah555710.1126/science.aah5557 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0126410.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01264 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20180250910.1002/adma.201802509 ↗
37. 10.1002/smll.20190438710.1002/smll.201904387 ↗
38. 10.1002/solr.20190022010.1002/solr.201900220 ↗
39. 10.1002/aenm.20190227910.1002/aenm.201902279 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0227710.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02277 ↗
41. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0477210.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04772 ↗
42. 10.1039/C9TA04707G10.1039/C9TA04707G ↗
43. 10.1002/adma.20160399410.1002/adma.201603994 ↗
44. 10.1039/C4TA02635G10.1039/C4TA02635G ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.0c0563210.1021/acsami.0c05632 ↗
46. 10.1021/nl400286w10.1021/nl400286w ↗
47. 10.1039/C8TA09382B10.1039/C8TA09382B ↗
48. Fang Z. · Sci. Bull. · 2019 · 64 · 50710.1016/j.scib.2019.04.013 ↗
49. 10.1002/aenm.20170223510.1002/aenm.201702235 ↗
50. 10.1039/C3TA13606J10.1039/C3TA13606J ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.03400710.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.034007 ↗
52. 10.1039/C5EE03522H10.1039/C5EE03522H ↗
53. 10.1021/nn502982810.1021/nn5029828 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.09710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.097 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.02110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.021 ↗
56. 10.1039/C5NR06189J10.1039/C5NR06189J ↗
57. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.03110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.031 ↗
58. 10.1002/aenm.20180234610.1002/aenm.201802346 ↗
59. 10.1002/aenm.20180208010.1002/aenm.201802080 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.04410.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.044 ↗