journal article·2025-01-13Open access

High-Specific Power Flexible Photovoltaics from Large-Area MoS2 for Space Applications

Timothy Ismael, Muhammad Aamir Abbas, Owen P. Harris, George B. Ingrish, Meghan E. Bush, Joshua M. Sasson, Jeremiah S. McNatt, Matthew David Escarra

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) such as MoS 2 and WSe 2 are excellent candidates for photovoltaic (PV) applications. Here, we present the modeling, fabrication, and characterization of large-area CVD-grown MoS 2 -based flexible PV on an off-the-shelf, 3 μm-thick flexible colorless polyimide with polyimide encapsulation designed for space structures. The devices are characterized under 1 sun AM0 illumination and show a V OC of 0.180 V and a specific power of 0.001 kW/kg for a subnanometer-thick, single MoS 2 monolayer absorber. Model projections indicate that the polyimide encapsulant introduces negligible absorption loss, and up to 12.97 kW/kg specific power is attainable for a 100 nm-thick MoS 2 absorber layer. The devices maintain their performance after repetitive bending down to 5 mm bend radius. An increase in performance is measured after radiation exposure to 1 MeV e – fluence, which is partially attributed to defect healing. Techno-economic analysis shows that even with a lower efficiency, the specific power of a 2D PV array designed for a 6U CubeSat is 2 orders of magnitude higher, and the cost to deploy in space is 2 orders of magnitude less than that of a Si panel used in space. This indicates that the 2D TMDC-based PV has great potential for space applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications · solar cell performance optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118-5636, United States

NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135, United States

Funding

Louisiana Space Grant Consortium · Louisiana NASA EPSCoR · Tulane University · National Science Foundation

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12633-023-02518-z10.1007/s12633-023-02518-z ↗
2. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.227035110.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270351 ↗
3. Shockley W. · 2018 · 35
4. 10.1002/(sici)1099-159x(200001/02)8:13.0.co;2-d10.1002/(sici)1099-159x(200001/02)8:13.0.co;2-d ↗
5. 10.1063/1.11580410.1063/1.115804 ↗
6. 10.1109/16.79200810.1109/16.792008 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560-020-00714-410.1038/s41560-020-00714-4 ↗
8. 10.1002/pip.364610.1002/pip.3646 ↗
9. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.293721810.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2937218 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586-022-05346-010.1038/s41586-022-05346-0 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41586-021-03964-810.1038/s41586-021-03964-8 ↗
12. 10.1021/accountsmr.0c0011110.1021/accountsmr.0c00111 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-023-01444-z10.1038/s41560-023-01444-z ↗
14. 10.1039/D3TA06388G10.1039/D3TA06388G ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20220012510.1002/aenm.202200125 ↗
16. 10.1038/s43246-022-00325-410.1038/s43246-022-00325-4 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl903868w10.1021/nl903868w ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.2c0165010.1021/acsami.2c01650 ↗
19. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.317998610.1109/JPHOTOV.2022.3179986 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0110310.1021/acsphotonics.7b01103 ↗
21. 10.1039/C4NR03703K10.1039/C4NR03703K ↗
22. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0219510.1021/acsnano.6b02195 ↗
23. 10.1021/nl401544y10.1021/nl401544y ↗
24. 10.1016/j.device.2023.10000310.1016/j.device.2023.100003 ↗
25. 10.1002/smtd.20170029410.1002/smtd.201700294 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp509345910.1021/jp5093459 ↗
27. Kinnison J. D. · Johns Hopkins APL Tech. Dig. Appl. Phys. Lab. · 1990 · 11 · 300
28. 10.1038/s41467-019-09219-510.1038/s41467-019-09219-5 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.8b1865910.1021/acsami.8b18659 ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms756410.1038/ncomms7564 ↗
31. 10.1126/sciadv.aax606110.1126/sciadv.aax6061 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.0c1557310.1021/acsami.0c15573 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10542710.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105427 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20221061910.1002/adfm.202210619 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41598-017-12287-610.1038/s41598-017-12287-6 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-021-27195-710.1038/s41467-021-27195-7 ↗
37. Carr, J. A.; Johnson, L.; Boyd, D.; Phillips, B.; Finckenor, M.; Farmer, B.; Smith, J. C. The Lightweight Integrated Solar Array and AnTenna: 3rd Generation Advancements, and Beyond; International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 2017.
38. 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10619810.1016/j.mssp.2021.106198 ↗
39. Maxeon Solar Technologies. Performance 6 Solar Panel SPR-P6–400-COM-XS, 2024 https://sunpower.maxeon.com/au/sites/default/files/2023-04/sp_mst_p6_com_xs_1092_1.8m_.6m_cable_ds_en_a4_evo2_548188.pdf. (accessed MAy 12, 2024).
40. 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.01.00710.1016/j.nantod.2015.01.007 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0001510.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00015 ↗
42. 10.1002/admi.20230003110.1002/admi.202300031 ↗
43. NeXolve. CP1 Polyimide Characteristics Typical Properties of CP1 Polyimide, 2022 https://nexolve.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/TDS_CP1_Clear.pdf. (accessed MAy 11, 2024).
44. 10.1364/OE.18.02471510.1364/OE.18.024715 ↗
45. 10.1002/adpr.20200018010.1002/adpr.202000180 ↗
46. 10.1002/admi.20230045510.1002/admi.202300455 ↗
47. 10.1038/nmat378910.1038/nmat3789 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.495403910.1063/1.4954039 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.293883910.1063/1.2938839 ↗
50. 10.1038/ncomms177210.1038/ncomms1772 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41586-018-0129-810.1038/s41586-018-0129-8 ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20180823110.1002/adma.201808231 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0007010.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00070 ↗
54. 10.1039/c2nr32394j10.1039/c2nr32394j ↗
55. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71446-810.1016/S1369-7021(06)71446-8 ↗
56. 10.1109/TNS.2010.208368910.1109/TNS.2010.2083689 ↗
57. Uribe, R. M. In A New Electron Accelerator Facility for Commercial and Educational Uses, AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP, 2001; pp 775–778.10.1063/1.1395420 ↗
58. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Qualification and Quality Requirements for Space-Qualified Solar Panels 2005, 15.
59. Sawyer, D. M.; Vette, J. I. AP-8 Trapped Proton Environment for Solar Maximum and Solar Minimum; NASA: 1976; p 18983.
60. Messenger S. R. · Energy · 2008 · 10 · 6
61. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.340537310.1109/ACCESS.2024.3405373 ↗
62. 10.1002/jrs.590810.1002/jrs.5908 ↗
63. Kulu, E. Nanosatellite & CubeSat Database, 2024. https://www.nanosats.eu/. (accessed April 05, 2024).
64. Kulu, E. In Nanosatellite Launch Forecasts─Track Record and Latest Prediction, 36th Annul Small Satellite Conference; UtahState University, 2022.
65. Chamberlain, M. K.; Kiefer, S. H.; Banik, J. A. In Structural Analysis Methods for the Roll-Out Solar Array Flight Experiment, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum; ARC, 2019; pp 1–15.10.2514/6.2019-2376 ↗
66. Lee, A. J.; Fernandez, J. M. In Mechanics of Bistable Two-Shelled Composite Booms, 2018 AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conference; ARC, 2018; pp 1–24.10.2514/6.2018-0938 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.asr.2010.12.01110.1016/j.asr.2010.12.011 ↗
68. 10.1115/1.405535710.1115/1.4055357 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.10490410.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104904 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.02.00110.1016/j.actaastro.2023.02.001 ↗
71. 10.2514/2.291610.2514/2.2916 ↗
72. 10.1364/OE.38403910.1364/OE.384039 ↗
73. 10.1021/acsami.2c0165010.1021/acsami.2c01650 ↗
74. Jones, H. W. The Recent Large Reduction in Space Launch Cost, 48th International Conference on Environmental Systems; ICES, 2018.
75. Woodhouse, M.; Feldman, D.; Ramasamy, V.; Smith, B.; Silverman, T.; Barnes, T.; Zuboy, J.; Margolis, R. Research and Development Priorities to Advance Solar Photovoltaic Lifecycle Costs and Performance; National Renewable Energy Lab.: Golden, CO (United States), 2021; pp 1–52.10.2172/1826113 ↗