Quantifying Infiltration for Quality Control in Printed Mesoscopic Perovskite Solar Cells: A Microscopic Perspective
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Mesoscopic carbon-based perovskite solar cells (CPSCs) are often cited as a potential frontrunner to perovskite commercialization. Infiltration, the extent to which perovskite fills the mesoporous scaffold, is critical for optimum performance and stability. However, infiltration data are usually presented as qualitative photographic comparisons of samples with extreme infiltration variation. This work examines how small infiltration defects impact performance using an optical microscopy examination of the base TiO 2 layer to identify issues and develop targeted techniques for infiltration enhancement. Critically, the uninfiltrated area at the base of the stack was found to correlate well with PCE across multiple batches of varied print quality and ZrO 2 thickness. Through reduction of mesh mark defects and improvement of print quality in the ZrO 2 and carbon layers, a champion PCE of 15.01% is attained. It follows that this facile, multiscaled, nondestructive technique could enable targeted performance enhancement and quality control in future scale-up initiatives.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Swansea University, Bay Campus, Neath, Skewen SA18EN, Wales
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Royal Society · European Regional Development Fund · Innovate UK · Newton Fund
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. (No Title). Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/pv-efficiency-chart.20181221.pdf (accessed 2021–03–11).
2. 10.1088/1674-1056/27/1/01880510.1088/1674-1056/27/1/018805 ↗
3. 10.3390/en1402038610.3390/en14020386 ↗
4. 10.1039/C9TA11907H10.1039/C9TA11907H ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.01010.1016/j.joule.2020.09.010 ↗
6. 10.1002/admt.20180015610.1002/admt.201800156 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.09.00810.1016/j.fmre.2021.09.008 ↗
8. 10.1021/ACS.JPCLETT.2C00334/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/JZ2C00334_0004.JPEG10.1021/ACS.JPCLETT.2C00334/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/JZ2C00334_0004.JPEG ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.00510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.01810.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.018 ↗
11. 10.1039/d1ma00975c10.1039/d1ma00975c ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20170578610.1002/adma.201705786 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20190088510.1002/adfm.201900885 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0103810.1021/acsaem.8b01038 ↗
15. 10.1002/admt.20160018310.1002/admt.201600183 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20190088510.1002/adfm.201900885 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41578-019-0176-210.1038/s41578-019-0176-2 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1419585210.3390/ma14195852 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.02910.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.029 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0105810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01058 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20130209010.1002/adfm.201302090 ↗
22. 10.1002/pip.271610.1002/pip.2716 ↗
23. 10.3390/nano1009163510.3390/nano10091635 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11429410.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114294 ↗
25. 10.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.05.01810.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.05.018 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cap.2020.02.00910.1016/j.cap.2020.02.009 ↗
27. 10.1039/C4TA07030E10.1039/C4TA07030E ↗
28. 10.1039/C4TA04647A10.1039/C4TA04647A ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.10610.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.106 ↗
30. 10.1155/2019/834823710.1155/2019/8348237 ↗
31. 10.1002/solr.20200059510.1002/solr.202000595 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.08.01310.1016/j.orgel.2018.08.013 ↗
33. 10.3390/coatings1010100810.3390/coatings10101008 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12200-019-0904-710.1007/s12200-019-0904-7 ↗