Influence of the Transparent Conductive Oxide Type on the Performance of Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
In inverted perovskite solar cells (PSCs), indium tin oxide (ITO) is the most commonly used transparent conductive oxide (TCO) layer for coating glass substrates. However, the preference for the ITO has never been clearly stated. Although the ITO layers are generally more conductive than the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) layers, indium is a rare and expensive metal. In this work, the possibility of using FTO instead of ITO is explored. The electrical performance and surface morphology of the two TCO substrates are investigated, as well as the performance of PSCs fabricated with them. Although there is a large difference between the surface roughness of the two TCO substrates, this morphological feature was found to have no effect on the performance of the corresponding cells. The champion device was fabricated with an FTO-coated glass substrate, and the improved efficiency was attributed to the higher short-circuit current density. The results obtained during the development of this work indicate that FTO can indeed be used as a TCO substrate for inverted perovskite solar cells without sacrificing efficiency and stability, with the important feature of being cheaper and more environmentally friendly than ITO.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LEPABE─Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
ALiCE─Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Funding
Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.06310.1016/j.rser.2015.11.063 ↗
2. 10.1002/ente.20210095210.1002/ente.202100952 ↗
3. NREL Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed Sept 07, 2023).
4. 10.1038/s41586-023-06207-010.1038/s41586-023-06207-0 ↗
5. 10.2494/photopolymer.32.59710.2494/photopolymer.32.597 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.07.00210.1016/j.tsf.2010.07.002 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.510433310.1063/1.5104333 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.06.03710.1016/j.materresbull.2018.06.037 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.337440610.1063/1.3374406 ↗
10. 10.1002/pssa.20122832510.1002/pssa.201228325 ↗
11. 10.1039/b9nr00430k10.1039/b9nr00430k ↗
12. 10.1039/c1ee01766g10.1039/c1ee01766g ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-021-00941-310.1038/s41560-021-00941-3 ↗
14. 10.1126/sciadv.abj793010.1126/sciadv.abj7930 ↗
15. van der Pauw L. J. · Philips Res. Rep. · 1958 · 13 · 1
16. 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.05.01910.1016/j.orgel.2019.05.019 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41560-019-0538-410.1038/s41560-019-0538-4 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5EE03874J10.1039/C5EE03874J ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms874710.1038/ncomms8747 ↗
20. 10.3938/jkps.69.40610.3938/jkps.69.406 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.01310.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14855910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148559 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20190083810.1002/aenm.201900838 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.0c0997010.1021/acsami.0c09970 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41598-023-33147-610.1038/s41598-023-33147-6 ↗
26. 10.1002/tcr.20210015010.1002/tcr.202100150 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41566-019-0398-210.1038/s41566-019-0398-2 ↗
28. 10.1002/ente.20170030810.1002/ente.201700308 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0160610.1021/acsenergylett.8b01606 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.34964510.1063/1.349645 ↗
31. 10.1002/advs.20160026910.1002/advs.201600269 ↗
32. 10.1039/D1RA00338K10.1039/D1RA00338K ↗
33. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.03.03510.1016/j.solmat.2016.03.035 ↗