Strategic Optimization of Gradient-Structured HTL-free Lead-free Double-Perovskite Solar Cells for Enhanced Photovoltaic Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Lead-free perovskite solar cells (PSCs) based on Cs 2 TiBr 6 are promising for environmentally sustainable photovoltaics, but their efficiency is often constrained by poor band alignment and recombination losses. Here, we use SCAPS-1D simulations to investigate a hole transport layer (HTL)-free Cs 2 TiBr 6 PSC employing an optimized gradient doping ( G d ) strategy to overcome these limitations. The absorber layer doping concentration was exponentially graded with a gradient factor G = 300, identified after varying G from 1 to 1000, and paired with reduced bulk (1 × 10 16 cm –3 ) and interfacial (1 × 10 14 cm –3 ) defect densities. This combination enhances the band alignment, strengthens the internal electric field, and suppresses trap-assisted recombination. The resulting device achieves a PCE of 21.0% (Voc = 1.374 V, Jsc = 18.25 mA cm –2, FF = 83.69%), outperforming uniformly doped devices (10.85%) and previously reported Cs 2 TiBr 6 PSCs (≤19.30%). These findings establish gradient doping as a practical design pathway for scalable, stable, and high-efficiency lead-free PSCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
National Institute of Technology
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s43586-024-00373-910.1038/s43586-024-00373-9 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0203210.1021/acsenergylett.3c02032 ↗
3. 10.1088/1402-4896/ad43c710.1088/1402-4896/ad43c7 ↗
4. 10.1002/anie.20180767410.1002/anie.201807674 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.21595710.1016/j.ccr.2024.215957 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20250350810.1002/adfm.202503508 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20160033010.1002/aenm.201600330 ↗
8. 10.3390/en1423787010.3390/en14237870 ↗
9. 10.1039/D3VA00401E10.1039/D3VA00401E ↗
10. 10.3389/felec.2021.71278510.3389/felec.2021.712785 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.11335210.1016/j.solmat.2024.113352 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.00110.1016/j.joule.2021.03.001 ↗
13. 10.1039/C5TA05741H10.1039/C5TA05741H ↗
14. 10.1039/C4EE01076K10.1039/C4EE01076K ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.00910.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.00910.1016/j.joule.2018.01.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.micrna.2024.20799110.1016/j.micrna.2024.207991 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.17023210.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170232 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.00910.1016/j.joule.2018.01.009 ↗
20. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.307011210.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070112 ↗
21. Ahmed, S.; Jannat, F.; Alim, M. A. A Study of Cesium Titanium Bromide Based Perovskite Solar Cell with Different Hole and Electron Transport Materials. 2020 2nd International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology (ICAICT); IEEE, 2020, pp 297–301.10.1109/ICAICT51780.2020.9333520.10.1109/ICAICT51780.2020.9333520 ↗
22. 10.1039/C6TA08332C10.1039/C6TA08332C ↗
23. 10.47238/ijeca.v5i1.11910.47238/ijeca.v5i1.119 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10757510.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107575 ↗
25. 10.1039/D0TC02226H10.1039/D0TC02226H ↗
26. 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.11249610.1016/j.optmat.2022.112496 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.05910.1016/j.solener.2020.12.059 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20180378510.1002/aenm.201803785 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cap.2022.08.01210.1016/j.cap.2022.08.012 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20230187910.1002/adma.202301879 ↗
31. 10.1002/solr.20200062910.1002/solr.202000629 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c0417910.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04179 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20250116210.1002/adma.202501162 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0208910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02089 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-110.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.solener.2025.11331310.1016/j.solener.2025.113313 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0591210.1021/acsomega.2c05912 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0095310.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00953 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0030610.1021/acsomega.3c00306 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.09110.1016/j.solener.2021.09.091 ↗
41. 10.3390/polym1313211010.3390/polym13132110 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.solener.2024.11261810.1016/j.solener.2024.112618 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.renene.2024.12209210.1016/j.renene.2024.122092 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0095310.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00953 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.solener.2024.11305110.1016/j.solener.2024.113051 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.05910.1016/j.solener.2020.12.059 ↗
47. 10.1002/smtd.20250006410.1002/smtd.202500064 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20250116210.1002/adma.202501162 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cap.2022.08.01210.1016/j.cap.2022.08.012 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c0417910.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04179 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.10095510.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100955 ↗