Optimization of Solar Cell Production Lines Using Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
To keep improving the efficiency-to-cost ratio of photovoltaic solar cells, manufacturing lines must be continuously improved. Efficiency optimization is usually performed process-wise and can be slow and time-consuming. In this study, we propose a machine-learning-based method to perform simultaneous multiprocess optimization. Using the natural variation of a production line, we train machine learning models to investigate the relationship between process parameters and cell efficiency. We employ genetic algorithms to identify new process parameters in order to maximize cell efficiency. The proposed method is demonstrated on a simulated production line of monocrystalline aluminum-back surface field solar cells. Using neural networks, an accurate model is built to predict cell efficiencies from input process parameters with errors of <0.03% absolute efficiency. In five iterations, the mean cell efficiency increases from 18.07% to 19.45%. Provided strong process monitoring and accurate wafer tracking, the proposed method is directly applicable to production-type datasets, enabling the photovoltaic industry to build smart factories and join the fourth industrial revolution.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CD Netherlands
Funding
Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics · Australian Renewable Energy Agency
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. IPCC · 2018
2. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.01010.1016/j.joule.2019.02.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.01510.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.015 ↗
4. Myers R. H. · 2016
5. Roy R. K. · 2001
6. 10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-810.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20140045910.1002/aenm.201400459 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00500-009-0438-910.1007/s00500-009-0438-9 ↗
9. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.300493010.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3004930 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0472610.1021/acsnano.8b04726 ↗
11. 10.1109/TSM.2011.211526110.1109/TSM.2011.2115261 ↗
12. Kloter B. · 2018 · 3489
13. Holland J. H. · 1984 · 16 · 31710.1007/978-1-4684-8941-5_21 ↗
14. Kagermann H. · 2015 · 2310.1007/978-3-658-05014-6_2 ↗
15. Abbott M. D. · 2015 · 1
16. 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.01010.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.010 ↗
17. Rubinstein R. Y. · 200710.1002/9780470230381 ↗
18. Green M. A. · J. Proc.—R. Soc. New South Wales · 2015 · 148 · 210.5962/p.361724 ↗
19. Basak D. · Neural Inform. Process.—Lett. Rev. · 2007 · 11 · 203
20. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-210.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/0004-3702(89)90049-010.1016/0004-3702(89)90049-0 ↗
23. Kohavi R. · 1995 · 2 · 1137
24. Glantz S. A. · 1990
25. Pedregosa F. · J. Machine Learning Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
26. Fortin F.-A. · J. Machine Learning Res. · 2012 · 13 · 2171
27. Nielsen M. A. · 2015
28. 10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
29. Fischer, M. International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaics; 2010.
30. Fischer, M.; Woodhouse, M.; Herritsch, S.; Trube, J. International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaics, 2019 Results, 11th Edition; VDMA Photovoltaic Equipment: Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2020.