journal article·2022-08-09Open access

Model for Rating a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Stack through Constant Power Charge–Discharge Characterization

Pavan Kumar Vudisi, Sreenivas Jayanti, Raghuram Chetty

Batteries· Volume 8· Issue 8

Abstract

A method for estimating the stack rating of vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) through constant power characterization was developed. A stack of 22 cells, each with 1500 cm2 of nominal electrode area, was constructed and tested using constant current and constant power protocols. Typical ratios of charging to discharging power that prevail in various applications (e.g., peak shaving, wind power/solar photovoltaic power integration) were employed in the test protocols. The results showed that fractional energy storage capacity utilization and round-trip energy efficiency varied linearly with the power at which the energy was charged or discharged. A zero-dimensional electrochemical model was proposed based on the area-specific resistance to account for the energy stored/extracted during constant power discharge in the state of charge (SoC) window of 20% to 80%. It was shown that this could be used to rate a given stack in terms of charging and discharging power from the point of view of its application as a power unit. The proposed method enables stack rating based on a single polarization test and can be extended to flow battery systems in general.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India

Funding

Department of Science and Technology (DST) · Ministry of Education (MoE)

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Performance of a vanadium redox flow battery for the storage of electricity produced in photovoltaic solar panels10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.118 ↗
2. Jia, H., Fu, Y., Zhang, Y., and He, W. (2010, January 28–31). Design of hybrid energy storage control system for wind farms based on flow battery and electric double-layer capacitor. Proceedings of the 2010 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, Chengdu, China.10.1109/APPEEC.2010.5448720 ↗
3. Parmeshwarappa, P., Gundlapalli, R., and Jayanti, S. (2021). Power and Energy Rating Considerations in Integration of Flow Battery with Solar PV and Residential Load. Batteries, 7.10.3390/batteries7030062 ↗
4. A land-use-constrained, generation–transmission model for electricity generation through solar photovoltaic technology: A case study of south India10.1007/s10098-021-02202-z ↗
5. Energy storage technologies and real life applications–A state of the art review10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.097 ↗
6. Progress in Flow Battery Research and Development10.1149/1.3599565 ↗
7. Redox flow batteries for the storage of renewable energy: A review10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.001 ↗
8. Vanadium redox flow batteries: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.est.2019.100844 ↗
9. Recent Advancements in All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries10.1002/admi.201500309 ↗
10. Recent progress in redox flow battery research and development10.1002/adfm.201200694 ↗
11. An optimal strategy of electrolyte flow rate for vanadium redox flow battery10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.11.036 ↗
12. Characteristics and performance of 10 kW class all-vanadium redox-flow battery stack10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.08.016 ↗
13. 1 kW/1 kWh advanced vanadium redox flow battery utilizing mixed acid electrolytes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.045 ↗
14. Performance of the all-vanadium redox flow battery stack10.1016/j.jiec.2016.10.007 ↗
15. Gundlapalli, R., and Jayanti, S. (2021). Comparative study of kilowatt-scale vanadium redox flow battery stacks designed with serpentine flow fields and split manifolds. Batteries, 7.10.3390/batteries7020030 ↗
16. Developing vanadium redox flow technology on a 9-kW 26-kWh industrial scale test facility: Design review and early experiments10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.021 ↗
17. Trovo, A., Picano, F., and Guarnieri, M. (2019, January 12–14). Maximizing Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Efficiency: Strategies of Flow Rate Control. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/ISIE.2019.8781152 ↗
18. A dynamic performance model for redox-flow batteries involving soluble species10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.067 ↗
19. A simple model for the vanadium redox battery10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.086 ↗
20. Open circuit voltage of vanadium redox flow batteries: Discrepancy between models and experiments10.1016/j.elecom.2011.01.020 ↗
21. Analysis of a model for the operation of a vanadium redox battery10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.060 ↗
22. An enhancement to Vynnycky’s model for the all-vanadium redox flow battery10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.074 ↗
23. A Dynamic Unit Cell Model for the All-Vanadium Flow Battery10.1149/1.3561426 ↗
24. Performance Modeling of a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery during Discharging10.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.138 ↗
25. Studies on pressure losses and flow rate optimization in vanadium redox flow battery10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.071 ↗
26. Zero dimensional dynamic model of vanadium redox fl ow battery cell incorporating all modes of vanadium ions crossover10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.124 ↗
27. Energy efficiency analysis for a kilo-watt class vanadium redox flow battery system10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113533 ↗
28. Effect of electrolyte convection velocity in the electrode on the performance of vanadium redox flow battery cells with serpentine flow fields10.1016/j.est.2020.101516 ↗
29. High current polarization tests on a 9 kW vanadium redox flow battery10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.035 ↗
30. Determination of Overpotentials in All Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries10.1149/05837.0001ecst ↗