journal article·2019-06-24Open access

All-Thin-Film Perovskite/C–Si Four-Terminal Tandems: Interlayer and Intermediate Contacts Optimization

Manuel Chapa, Miguel F. Alexandre, Manuel J. Mendes, Hugo Águas, Elvira Fortunato, Rodrigo Martins

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 2· Issue 6

Abstract

Combined perovskite/crystalline-silicon four-terminal tandem solar cells promise >30% efficiencies. Here we propose all-thin-film double-junction architectures where high-bandgap perovskite top cells are coupled to ultrathin c-Si bottom cells enhanced with light trapping. A complete optoelectronic model of the devices was developed and applied to determine the optimal intermediate layers, which are paramount to maximize the cells’ photocurrent. It was ascertained that by replacing the transparent conductive oxides by grid-based metallic contacts in the intermediate positions, the parasitic absorption is lowered by 30%. Overall, a 29.2% efficiency is determined for ∼2 um thick tandems composed of the optimized interlayers and improved with Lambertian light trapping.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

i3N/CENIMAT, Department of Materials Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa and CEMOP/UNINOVA, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal

Funding

European Regional Development Fund · Funda??o para a Ci?ncia e a Tecnologia

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Schmela, M. SolarPower Europe. Global Market Outlook For Solar Power: 2018–2022; Solar Power Europe: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; pp 1–81.
2. International Energy Agency. World Energy Balances, 1st ed. IEA Publications, 2018.
3. 10.1039/C7TC05271E10.1039/C7TC05271E ↗
4. 10.1039/C7EE02627G10.1039/C7EE02627G ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.00710.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.007 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20160112810.1002/aenm.201601128 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0025410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00254 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1112257010.3390/ma11122570 ↗
9. 10.1002/pssa.20153289110.1002/pssa.201532891 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20160258110.1002/smll.201602581 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl501738b10.1021/nl501738b ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.04610.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.046 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0004410.1021/acsaem.8b00044 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0109210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01092 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.03810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.038 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.02910.1016/j.solener.2017.01.029 ↗
17. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1110.1038/natrevmats.2016.11 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.01510.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.015 ↗
19. 10.1039/C4CP03788J10.1039/C4CP03788J ↗
20. 10.1002/pip.79910.1002/pip.799 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.aad584510.1126/science.aad5845 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0008910.1021/acsenergylett.8b00089 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.02310.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.023 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn501601e10.1021/nn501601e ↗
25. Palik E. D. · 1985 · 1
26. SpecialChem. Low & Ultra-low Refractive Index Polymers, 2011; https://omnexus.specialchem.com/tech-library/article/low-ultra-low-refractive-index-polymers (accessed Apr. 20, 2019).
27. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0027110.1021/acsaem.9b00271 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.isci.2018.04.01810.1016/j.isci.2018.04.018 ↗
29. 10.1039/C7TC01756A10.1039/C7TC01756A ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.03810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.038 ↗
31. Datta S. · 1989
32. 10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.00910.1016/j.solener.2015.11.009 ↗
33. 10.1039/C5EE03874J10.1039/C5EE03874J ↗
34. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.227648410.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2276484 ↗
35. 10.1039/C7EE02185B10.1039/C7EE02185B ↗
36. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3810.1038/nenergy.2017.38 ↗