journal article·2022-05-23Open access

Indium Gallium Oxide Emitters for High-Efficiency CdTe-Based Solar Cells

Manoj K. Jamarkattel, Adam B. Phillips, Indra Subedi, Abasi Abudulimu, Ebin Bastola, Deng-Bing Li, Xavier Mathew, Yanfa Yan, Randy J. Ellingson, Nikolas J. Podraza, Michael J. Heben

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 5· Issue 5

Abstract

There are limited choices for front-surface, electron-selective contacts (emitters) for CdTe solar cells, thus hindering scientific and technical development. Here we investigate the photovoltaic performance of devices fabricated with (InxGa1–x)2O3 (IGO) emitters with varying In-to-Ga ratios prepared by cosputtering. In agreement with predictions, an IGO emitter with a 4.03 eV bandgap (x = 0.36) allowed fabrication of devices with efficiencies of 16%. Increasing the performance to higher values will be enabled by increasing the transmission through the IGO-coated substrate and decreasing the bulk and back interface recombination. These findings demonstrate IGO materials as effective emitters in high-efficiency CdTe-based solar cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Wright Center for Photovoltaic Innovation and Commercialization, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, United States

Instituto de Engergías Renovables, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Temixco, Morelaos 62580, México

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html.(accessed 2022-01-10).
2. 10.1063/1.490153210.1063/1.4901532 ↗
3. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.278702110.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2787021 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.498432010.1063/1.4984320 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0117310.1021/acsaem.8b01173 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0036710.1021/acsaem.9b00367 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-018-32746-y10.1038/s41598-018-32746-y ↗
8. 10.1038/s41560-019-0446-710.1038/s41560-019-0446-7 ↗
9. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.312050610.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3120506 ↗
10. 10.1002/ese3.84310.1002/ese3.843 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.495382010.1063/1.4953820 ↗
12. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.301774110.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3017741 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11138810.1016/j.solmat.2021.111388 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.03402810.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034028 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ssc.2014.01.02410.1016/j.ssc.2014.01.024 ↗
16. 10.1002/pssb.1968027022910.1002/pssb.19680270229 ↗
17. 10.1002/pssa.20133018410.1002/pssa.201330184 ↗
18. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.28210.1038/nphoton.2012.282 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.149161310.1063/1.1491613 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.28910.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.289 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.505439410.1063/1.5054394 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.512057810.1063/1.5120578 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.0c1602110.1021/acsami.0c16021 ↗
24. 10.1063/5.006080110.1063/5.0060801 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11132410.1016/j.solmat.2021.111324 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0023310.1021/acsaem.9b00233 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tsf.2019.13755610.1016/j.tsf.2019.137556 ↗
28. 10.1109/PVSC43889.2021.951899710.1109/PVSC43889.2021.9518997 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.05010.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.050 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0283610.1021/acsenergylett.9b02836 ↗