Solution-Processed Highly Efficient Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells with Low Donor Contents
Source abstract
Abstract
Semitransparent organic solar cells (ST-OSCs) are promising candidates for applications in building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) as windows and facades. The challenge to achieve highly efficient ST-OSCs is the trade-off between power conversion efficiency (PCE) and average visible transmittance (AVT). Herein, solution-processed ST-OSCs are demonstrated on the basis a polymer donor, PM6, and a small molecule acceptor, Y6; lowering the visible-absorbing PM6 contents in blends could increase AVT and maintain PCE. Additionally, conductive polymer PEDOT:PSS is used as the top electrode due to its high transparency, good conductivity, and solution processability. Efficient ST-OSCs with 20 wt % PM6 achieve high PCE of 7.46% and AVT of 36.4%. The light utilization efficiency (LUE) of 2.72% is among the best reported values for solution-processed ST-OSCs. This work provides a straightforward approach for solution-processed ST-OSCs by combining a low fraction of visible-wavelength-selective polymer donors with near-infrared nonfullerene acceptors to achieve high PCE and AVT simultaneously.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electronic and Photonic Materials (EFM), Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, Linköping SE-58183, Sweden
Laboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology (ITN), Linköping University, Norrköping SE-60174, Sweden
Funding
Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse · Swedish Government Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Link??ping University
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1471-0846(08)70179-310.1016/S1471-0846(08)70179-3 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-017-0016-910.1038/s41560-017-0016-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.12.01810.1016/j.joule.2019.12.018 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.00210.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.002 ↗
5. 10.1039/c2ee22623e10.1039/c2ee22623e ↗
6. 10.1021/nn302932710.1021/nn3029327 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.02.01010.1016/j.joule.2021.02.010 ↗
8. 10.1039/D0EE03378B10.1039/D0EE03378B ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20200162110.1002/adma.202001621 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0061810.1021/acsphotonics.7b00618 ↗
11. 10.1039/C8EE00154E10.1039/C8EE00154E ↗
12. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.00510.1016/j.joule.2019.06.005 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10537610.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105376 ↗
14. 10.1002/solr.20210004110.1002/solr.202100041 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20120382710.1002/adma.201203827 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.7b1334610.1021/acsami.7b13346 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.221227010.1063/1.2212270 ↗
18. 10.1002/aenm.20120067910.1002/aenm.201200679 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.294579610.1063/1.2945796 ↗
20. 10.1002/pssa.20082442810.1002/pssa.200824428 ↗
21. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020503)14:9<662::AID-ADMA662>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/1521-4095(20020503)14:9<662::AID-ADMA662>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20100229010.1002/adfm.201002290 ↗
23. 10.1021/nn406672n10.1021/nn406672n ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0485810.1021/acsnano.5b04858 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.02.01710.1016/j.orgel.2011.02.017 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20140140010.1002/adma.201401400 ↗
27. 10.1039/C6MH00164E10.1039/C6MH00164E ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20120020410.1002/aenm.201200204 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.9b1561710.1021/acsami.9b15617 ↗
30. 10.1149/2.0231902jss10.1149/2.0231902jss ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scib.2019.09.01610.1016/j.scib.2019.09.016 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.01010.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.010 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20180343810.1002/aenm.201803438 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmat506310.1038/nmat5063 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.0c0912310.1021/acsami.0c09123 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00410.1016/j.joule.2019.01.004 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0121910.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01219 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0565410.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05654 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20090440710.1002/adma.200904407 ↗
40. 10.1093/nsr/nww02010.1093/nsr/nww020 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.01010.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.010 ↗
42. 10.1002/solr.20200032810.1002/solr.202000328 ↗
43. 10.1002/aenm.20130010010.1002/aenm.201300100 ↗
44. 10.1021/am505347p10.1021/am505347p ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.01510.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.015 ↗
46. 10.1002/admt.20160018410.1002/admt.201600184 ↗
47. 10.1002/ente.20160066610.1002/ente.201600666 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.03.01310.1016/j.orgel.2017.03.013 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10853-020-04975-y10.1007/s10853-020-04975-y ↗
50. 10.1063/1.37075710.1063/1.370757 ↗
51. Byrnes, S. J. Multilayer Optical Calculations. arXiv Preprint (Computational Physics), 2016. arXiv:1603.02720. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02720#.
52. 10.1002/solr.20180027010.1002/solr.201800270 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0091910.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00919 ↗