journal article·2022-05-23Open access

A Comparison of Different Textured and Non-Textured Anti-Reflective Coatings for Planar Monolithic Silicon-Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells

Michael Spence, Richard Hammond, Adam Pockett, Zhengfei Wei, Andrew Johnson, Trystan Watson, Matthew J. Carnie

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 5· Issue 5

Abstract

Multijunction solar cells offer a route to exceed the Shockley-Queisser limit for single-junction devices. In a few short years, silicon-perovskite tandems have significantly passed the efficiency of the best silicon single-junction cells. For scalable solution processing of silicon-perovskite tandem devices, with the avoidance of vacuum processing steps, a flat silicon sub-cell is normally required. This results in a flat top surface that can lead to higher optical reflection losses than conformal deposition on textured silicon bottom cells. To overcome this, textured anti-reflective coatings (ARCs) can be used on top of the finished cell, with textured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), a promising candidate. In this work, we vary the texture geometry and film thickness of PDMS anti-reflective foils to understand the effect of these parameters on reflectance of the foil. The best film is selected, and anti-reflective performance is compared with two common planar ARCs-lithium fluoride (LiF) and magnesium fluoride (MgF2) showing considerable reduction in reflectance for a non-textured silicon-perovskite tandem cell. The application of a PDMS film is shown to give a 3-5% increase in integrated J SC in each sub-cell of a silicon-perovskite tandem structure.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · solar cell performance optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science & Engineering and SPECIFIC-IKC, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK

IQE Silicon Compounds, Beech House, Pascal Close, St. Mellons, Cardiff CF3 0LW, UK

IQE Europe Ltd., Pascal Close, St. Mellons, Cardiff CF3 0LW, UK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · European Regional Development Fund

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pip.344410.1002/pip.3444 ↗
2. 10.1002/admi.20170073110.1002/admi.201700731 ↗
3. 10.1002/sus2.2510.1002/sus2.25 ↗
4. 10.1002/eem2.1211810.1002/eem2.12118 ↗
5. 10.1364/OE.26.00A57910.1364/OE.26.00A579 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.abb716710.1126/science.abb7167 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41586-021-03964-810.1038/s41586-021-03964-8 ↗
8. 10.1039/c9ta11245f10.1039/c9ta11245f ↗
9. 10.1039/C9SE00120D10.1039/C9SE00120D ↗
10. 10.1126/science.abd401610.1126/science.abd4016 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41563-018-0115-410.1038/s41563-018-0115-4 ↗
12. 10.1364/ome.7.00098910.1364/ome.7.000989 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.55553610.1063/1.555536 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0372110.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03721 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0120110.1021/acsenergylett.8b01201 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0138210.1021/acsenergylett.8b01382 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.03410.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.034 ↗
18. 10.1039/c8ee00689j10.1039/c8ee00689j ↗
19. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0013810.1021/acsphotonics.7b00138 ↗
20. 10.1364/OE.22.00286010.1364/OE.22.002860 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14477810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144778 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.01810.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.05.03110.1016/j.solener.2019.05.031 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.36715110.1063/1.367151 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16527910.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165279 ↗
26. 10.1016/0927-0248(93)90090-P10.1016/0927-0248(93)90090-P ↗
27. 10.1155/2013/71601210.1155/2013/716012 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0013610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00136 ↗
29. 10.1016/J.JOULE.2018.11.01710.1016/J.JOULE.2018.11.017 ↗
30. 10.1088/1361-6463/aad71c10.1088/1361-6463/aad71c ↗