Image-Force Lowering Effect in Polymer Photodetectors
Source abstract
Abstract
Recently, solution-processed polymer photodetectors (PDs) have attracted great attention in both academic and industrial sectors due to their advanced features compared with PDs based on traditional inorganic semiconductors. To achieve polymer PDs with a high external quantum efficiency (EQE) and ultrahigh detectivity ( D *), the trap-assisted photomultiplication (PM) effect that takes place in the depletion region is applied in polymer PDs. However, the distribution of electron acceptors adjacent to the electrodes and the work function of the cathodes that affect the PM effect in polymer PDs are not well studied. In this study, the “image-force” affected by the distribution of electron acceptors and metal cathodes is used to investigate the PM effect in polymer PDs. Our studies reveal that the trapping of electrons varies along with the concentration of electron acceptors, which affects the PM effect. The PM effect is also influenced by the work function of the metal cathodes and applied reverse bias. Moreover, by using Au as the cathode, an EQE of over 17000% and D * over 10 12 Jones are observed from polymer PDs under a reverse bias of −8 V. Our studies indicate that understanding the image-force-lowering effect is critical to achieving high device performance in PM-dominated polymer PDs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering
The University of Texas at Arlington
School of Polymer Science and Polymer Engineering
The University of Akron
Funding
University of Texas at Arlington
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/16.50241410.1109/16.502414 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.348801710.1063/1.3488017 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.196410.1103/PhysRevB.59.1964 ↗
4. 10.1038/nnano.2012.18710.1038/nnano.2012.187 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.11152710.1063/1.111527 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.150176410.1063/1.1501764 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.117670610.1126/science.1176706 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.242290910.1063/1.2422909 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.5b0004110.1021/acsami.5b00041 ↗
10. 10.1002/adom.20140002310.1002/adom.201400023 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep0918110.1038/srep09181 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5CP05557A10.1039/C5CP05557A ↗
13. 10.1021/acsaelm.4c0171510.1021/acsaelm.4c01715 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20230416910.1002/adfm.202304169 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.1c0648610.1021/acsami.1c06486 ↗
16. 10.1039/D5TC02167G10.1039/D5TC02167G ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20220438310.1002/adfm.202204383 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20210802610.1002/adfm.202108026 ↗
19. 10.1039/D3TC04263D10.1039/D3TC04263D ↗
20. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0201810.1021/acsphotonics.2c02018 ↗
21. 10.1002/9780470068328.ch1210.1002/9780470068328.ch12 ↗
22. 10.1002/advs.20210511310.1002/advs.202105113 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-021-24500-210.1038/s41467-021-24500-2 ↗
24. 10.1049/ip-i-1.1982.000110.1049/ip-i-1.1982.0001 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0095510.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00955 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41578-023-00606-510.1038/s41578-023-00606-5 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.327010510.1063/1.3270105 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.478999310.1063/1.4789993 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20130516010.1002/adma.201305160 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20100215410.1002/adfm.201002154 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.357339410.1063/1.3573394 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.0c1651410.1021/acsami.0c16514 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-018-07656-210.1038/s41467-018-07656-2 ↗
34. 10.1021/am509047g10.1021/am509047g ↗
35. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.07.02310.1016/j.orgel.2010.07.023 ↗
36. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.19010.1038/nphoton.2012.190 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0022-0728(74)80376-110.1016/S0022-0728(74)80376-1 ↗
38. 10.1002/pssa.221027012610.1002/pssa.2210270126 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.11939210.1063/1.119392 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.32353910.1063/1.323539 ↗
41. 10.1021/jacs.8b0460410.1021/jacs.8b04604 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.orgel.2023.10679610.1016/j.orgel.2023.106796 ↗