Interface Traps of Boron Nitride Gated Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Channel Field-Effect Transistors by Temperature Dependent Pulse Pumping Method
Source abstract
Abstract
Field-effect transistors (FETs) using transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) as channel materials are being extensively explored for future nanoelectronic applications. The mobility of MoS 2 is significantly short of the theoretically anticipated value, primarily due to constraints imposed by charged impurities and phonon scattering. The interface states associated with charge trapping and detrapping can have a significant impact on mobility, necessitating a more comprehensive investigation and understanding. In this study, we fabricated MoS 2 FET with hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) as a dielectric in a top-gate configuration and single pulse charge pumping (SPCP) method for different temperatures was introduced to evaluate interface trap densities. In pulse measurements, electrons move from the source to the gate during the rising phase and from the gate to source during the falling phase, manifesting as peaks in the current in time domain measurement. The interface trap densities obtained from SPCP revealed variations with temperature, observed to be comparable with those estimated from the subthreshold swing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · 2D Materials and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Institute for Advanced Study
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nn502153810.1021/nn5021538 ↗
2. 10.1021/jp111514610.1021/jp1115146 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab8c7810.1088/1361-6528/ab8c78 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl500171v10.1021/nl500171v ↗
5. 10.1021/nn502362b10.1021/nn502362b ↗
6. 10.1039/C9NR05065E10.1039/C9NR05065E ↗
7. 10.1021/nn503521c10.1021/nn503521c ↗
8. 10.1063/5.000530410.1063/5.0005304 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn405719x10.1021/nn405719x ↗
10. 10.1021/nl204361210.1021/nl2043612 ↗
11. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/8/08560410.1088/0957-4484/27/8/085604 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-020-15096-010.1038/s41467-020-15096-0 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0295010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02950 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.8b1068710.1021/acsami.8b10687 ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms408710.1038/ncomms4087 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.498575210.1063/1.4985752 ↗
17. 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa58c10.1088/1361-6463/aaa58c ↗
18. Hsu, F.C.; Chiu, K.Y. A comparative study of tunneling, substrate hot-electron and channel hot-electron injection induced degradation in thin-gate MOSFET’s 1984 International Electron device meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA; IEEE, 1984; pp 96–99, 10.1109/IEDM.1984.19065110.1109/IEDM.1984.190651 ↗
19. 10.1109/T-ED.1984.2147210.1109/T-ED.1984.21472 ↗
20. 10.1109/T-ED.1969.1674410.1109/T-ED.1969.16744 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl303583v10.1021/nl303583v ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.7b0273910.1021/acsami.7b02739 ↗
23. 10.7567/JJAP.56.03130110.7567/JJAP.56.031301 ↗
24. 10.1109/TED.2011.212226310.1109/TED.2011.2122263 ↗
25. 10.1109/TED.2018.285922410.1109/TED.2018.2859224 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.494240610.1063/1.4942406 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.504809910.1063/1.5048099 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41699-017-0038-y10.1038/s41699-017-0038-y ↗