Super-exchange interaction model in DMOs: Co doped TiO2 thin films
Source abstract
Abstract
This work presents a study of the structural, morphological, and magnetic properties of TiO2/Co thin films deposited by DC magnetron co-sputtering of Co and TiO2 targets, varying the concentration of the Co and TiO2 at room temperature. The formation of Co oxides binary phases was not observed. From XRD, μXRD, and Raman measurements were identified rutile and anatase phases, which evidence the formation of diluted magnetic oxide semiconductor (DMOs). Additionally, the TiO2 polymorphous and random location of Co ions are induced when the substrate is at room temperature, and in situ annealing process is applied. SEM, AFM, and MFM micrographs evidenced the formation of smaller grains (< 10 nm) in the surface without relationship with magnetic domains; values of the magnetic roughness were obtained between 199 and 442 pm. Magnetic measurements showed a ferromagnetic-like behavior with the appearance of a magnetic hysteresis loop. The hysteresis curves were associated with a combination of dipolar and super-exchange interactions between Co ions and mediated for oxygen ions based on Anderson’s model; this behavior was described from numerical simulations of isolated magnetic moments (Co atoms) diluted into a non-magnetic matrix (TiO2 structure). In this model, a random distribution of Co ions, contributing to dipolar magnetic interactions and super-exchange interaction, is considered, due to the hybridization sp3d2 of the Co–O bond and located randomly of Co ions. The experimental and theoretical results of this study present an explanation of ferromagnetic-like behavior for Co doped TiO2 thin films, as diluted magnetic semiconductor (DMS) for spintronic applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Magnetic properties of thin films · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Almeida VM, Mesquita A, de Zevallos AO, Mamani NC, Neves PP, Gratens X, Chitta VA, Ferraz WB, Doriguetto AC, Sabioni ACS, de Carvalho HB (2016) Room temperature ferromagnetism promoted by defects at zinc sites in Mn-doped ZnO. J Alloy Compd 655:406–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.08410.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.084 ↗
2. Riahi H, Thevenard L, Maaref MA, Gallas B, Lemaître A, Gourdon C (2015) Optimizing magneto-optical effects in the ferromagnetic semiconductor GaMnAs. J Magn Magn Mater 395:340–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.09010.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.090 ↗
3. Calderón Jorge A, Quiroz Heiddy P, Dussan A (2017) Optical and structural properties of GaSb-doped Mn based diluted magnetic semiconductor thin films grown via DC magnetron sputtering. Adv Mater Res 8:650–655. https://doi.org/10.5185/amlett.2017.711010.5185/amlett.2017.7110 ↗
4. Kamilla SK, Hazra SK, Samantaray BK, Basu S (2011) Electrical and magneto resistance studies of bulk Ga1−xNixSb ternary alloys. Solid State Sci 13:232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.11.02010.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.11.020 ↗
5. Guruvammala D, Selvaraja S, Meenakshi Sundar S (2018) Structural, optical and magnetic properties of Co doped ZnO DMS nanoparticles by microwave irradiation method. J Magn Magn Mater 452:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.12.09710.1016/j.jmmm.2017.12.097 ↗
6. Georgieva J, Valova E, Armyanov S, Tatchev D, Sotiropoulos S, Avramova I, Dimitrova N, Hubin A, Steenhaut O (2017) A simple preparation method and characterization of B and N co doped TiO2 nanotube arrays with enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Appl Surf Sci 413:284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.05510.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.055 ↗
7. Yermakov AY, Boukhvalov DW, Volegov AS, Uimina MA et al (2020) Unconventional magnetism of non-uniform distribution of Co in TiO2 nanoparticles. J Alloys Compd 826:154194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15419410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154194 ↗
8. Apostolov AT, Apostolova IN, Wesselinowa JM (2018) A comparative study of the magnetization in transition metal ion doped CeO2, TiO2 and SnO2 nanoparticles. Phys E Low-dimensional Syst Nanostruct 99:202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2018.02.00710.1016/j.physe.2018.02.007 ↗
9. Xia D, Hou Q, Guan Y (2019) Effect of Fe doping and O vacancies on the magnetic properties of rutile TiO2. J Supercond Novel Magn 32:3615–3621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-019-5129-x10.1007/s10948-019-5129-x ↗
10. Al-Agel Faisal A, Al-Arfaj Esam, Al-Ghamdi Ahmed A, Stein Barry D, Losovyj Yaroslav, Bronsteina Lyudmila M, Shokr FS, Mahmoud Waleed E (2015) Structure and magnetic properties of diluted magnetic metal oxides based on Cu-doped CeO2 nanopowders. Ceram Int 41:1115–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.03710.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.037 ↗
11. Elshamy M, Hassan Mostafa M, Said Sameh (2014) Comparative review of the TiO2 and the spintronic memristor devices. Electr Comput Eng (CCECE) 1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2014.690096610.1109/CCECE.2014.6900966 ↗
12. Abdelhamid Bouaine G, Schmerber D, Ihiawakrim A Derory (2012) Structural, optical, and magnetic properties of polycrystalline Co-doped TiO2 synthesized by solid-state method. Mater Sci Eng B 177:1618–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2012.08.01410.1016/j.mseb.2012.08.014 ↗
13. Anitha B, Abdul Khadar M, Banerjee Alok (2016) Paramagnetic behavior of Co doped TiO2 nanocrystals controlled by self-purification mechanism. J Solid State Chem 239:237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2016.04.03510.1016/j.jssc.2016.04.035 ↗
14. Hailong Wang, Lin Chen, Jianhua Zhao (2013) Enhancement of the Curie temperature of ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga, Mn)As. Sci China-Phys Mech Astrn 56:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-012-4959-310.1007/s11433-012-4959-3 ↗
15. Mack S, Myers RC, Heron JT, Gossard AC, Awschalom DD (2008) Stoichiometric growth of high Curie temperature heavily alloyed GaMnAs. Appl Phys Lett 92:192502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.292748110.1063/1.2927481 ↗
16. Wong H-SP, Raoux S, Kim S, Liang J, Reifenberg JP, Rajendran B, Asheghi M, Goodson KE (2010) Phase change memory. Proc IEEE 98:2201–2227. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.207005010.1109/JPROC.2010.2070050 ↗
17. Quiroz HP, Dussan A (2016) Synthesis of self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays: microstructural, stereoscopic, and topographic studies. J Appl Phys 120:051703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.495894010.1063/1.4958940 ↗
18. Rao CNR, Subba Rao GV (1974) Transition metal oxides—crystal chemistry, phase transition and related aspects. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Michigan
19. Heo Cheol Ho, Lee Soon-Bo, Boo Jin-Hyo (2005) Deposition of TiO2 thin films using RF magnetron sputtering method and study of their surface characteristics. Thin Solid Films 475:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.03310.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.033 ↗
20. Pansila P, Witit-anun N, Chaiyakun S (2012) Influence of sputtering power on structure and photocatalyst properties of DC magnetron sputtered TiO2 thin film. Procedia Eng 32:862–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.02.02410.1016/j.proeng.2012.02.024 ↗
21. Kaur Kulbir, Singh Chandra Veer (2012) Amorphous TiO2 as a photocatalyst for hydrogen production: a DFT study of structural and electronic properties. Energy Procedia 29:291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.09.03510.1016/j.egypro.2012.09.035 ↗
22. Quiroz HP (2014) Fabrication and study of the structural, optical, and morphological properties of TiO2 nanotubes for optical sensors application. M.Sc. thesis, National University of Colombia
23. Lazzeri M, Vittadini A, Selloni A (2001) Structure and energetics of stoichiometric TiO2 anatase surfaces. Phys. Rev B 63:155409. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.15540910.1103/PhysRevB.63.155409 ↗
24. Quiroz HP, Calderón JA, Dussan A (2020) Magnetic switching control in Co/TiO2 bilayer and TiO2: Co thin films for Magnetic-Resistive Random Access Memories (M-RRAM). J Alloys Compd 840:155674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15567410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155674 ↗
25. Clark AE (1980) Ferromagnetic materials. North-Holland, Amsterdam
26. Dionne GF (2009) Magnetic oxides. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4419-0054-8 ↗
27. Cabrera-German D, Gomez-Sosa G, Herrera-Gomez A (2016) Accurate peak fitting and subsequent quantitative composition analysis of the spectrum of Co 2p obtained with Al Kα radiation: I: cobalt spinel. Surf Interface Anal 48:252–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.593310.1002/sia.5933 ↗
28. Lukacevic I, Gupta SK, Jha PK, Kirin D (2012) Lattice dynamics and Raman spectrum of rutile TiO2: the role of soft phonon modes in pressure induced phase transition. Mater Chem Phys 137:282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.09.02210.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.09.022 ↗
29. Zhanga H, Ouyanga X, Yang B, Lutes R, Ni Y (2018) Synergistic effect of La and Co co-doping on room-temperature ferromagnetism enhancement of TiO2 nanoparticles. Ceram Int 44:6362–6369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.02710.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.027 ↗
30. Brand AL, Denardin JC, Knobel M, Dotto MER, Kleinke MU (2002) Study of interactions in Co–SiO2 granular films by means of MFM and magnetization. Phys B Condens Matter 320:213–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(02)00685-310.1016/S0921-4526(02)00685-3 ↗
31. Galhenage RP, Yan H, Tenney SA, Park N, Henkelman G, Albrecht P, Mullins DR, Chen DA (2013) Understanding the nucleation and growth of metals on TiO2: Co compared to Au, Ni, and Pt. J Phys Chem C 117:7191–7201. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp401283k10.1021/jp401283k ↗
32. Albella JM (2003) Láminas Delgadas y Recubrimientos: Preparación, Propiedades y Aplicaciones. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid
33. Tseng LT, Luo X, Tan TT, Li S, Jiabao Y (2014) Doping concentration dependence of microstructure and magnetic behaviours in Co-doped TiO2 nanorods. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:673–683. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-67310.1186/1556-276X-9-673 ↗
34. Anderson PW (1959) New approach to the theory of superexchange interactions. Phys Rev 115:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.115.210.1103/PhysRev.115.2 ↗
35. Blundell S (2001) Magnetism in condensed matter. Oxford University Press, New York10.1093/oso/9780198505921.001.0001 ↗
36. Srivastava CM, Srinivasan G, Nanadikar NG (1979) Exchange constants in spinel ferrites. Phys Rev B 19:499–508. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.19.49910.1103/PhysRevB.19.499 ↗
37. Thota S, Singh S (2017) Nature of magnetic ordering in cobalt-based spinels. Magnetic Spinels: Synthesis, Properties and Applications, IntechOpen, London, pp. 75–98. https://doi.org/10.5772/6591310.5772/65913 ↗
38. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.169911410.1063/1.1699114 ↗