Ion Sensitivity of Hygroscopic Insulator Field Effect Transistors
Source abstract
Abstract
Given the many and varied roles of ions in living organisms, biocompatible organic ion sensors are a matter of considerable interest. In this work, simple, low-voltage, solid-state hygroscopic insulator field effect transistors (HIFETs) have been tested to characterize their ion-sensitive properties. Two biologically relevant salt solutions, sodium chloride (NaCl) and potassium chloride (KCl), were tested. To assess pH sensitivity, solutions of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were also tested. The salts and acidic solutions caused similar, concentration-dependent changes in HIFET performance from 10 mM to 1 M, consistent with an increase in ion concentration in the hygroscopic insulator, increasing device capacitance. By contrast, basic solutions caused an overall decrease in device performance, consistent with a net removal of ions due to acid–base reactions between the insulator and the analyte. These results show that HIFETs exhibit promising sensitivity to a range of ions and can therefore serve as platforms for future ion-selective devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Conducting polymers and applications · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
Centre for Materials Science, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/b610062g10.1039/b610062g ↗
2. 10.3389/fncel.2018.0034210.3389/fncel.2018.00342 ↗
3. 10.1039/C9TB02474C10.1039/C9TB02474C ↗
4. 10.1021/cm402200310.1021/cm4022003 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0014610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00146 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.6b0825710.1021/acsami.6b08257 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.12.01710.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.12.017 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20130328110.1002/adma.201303281 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.487853910.1063/1.4878539 ↗
10. 10.1021/am100154e10.1021/am100154e ↗
11. 10.1002/admt.20160014110.1002/admt.201600141 ↗
12. 10.1143/JJAP.47.49610.1143/JJAP.47.496 ↗
13. 10.1039/b809608b10.1039/b809608b ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20040003010.1002/adma.200400030 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.206094910.1063/1.2060949 ↗
16. 10.1039/C9RA00148D10.1039/C9RA00148D ↗
17. 10.1039/D1TC00862E10.1039/D1TC00862E ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.1c2014310.1021/acsami.1c20143 ↗
19. 10.1002/admt.20210114910.1002/admt.202101149 ↗
20. 10.1002/aelm.20170031610.1002/aelm.201700316 ↗
21. 10.1039/C4EE01303D10.1039/C4EE01303D ↗
22. 10.1021/cr050154310.1021/cr0501543 ↗
23. 10.1039/C6TC01650B10.1039/C6TC01650B ↗
24. 10.1039/C4FD00095A10.1039/C4FD00095A ↗
25. 10.1136/bmj.332.7543.70210.1136/bmj.332.7543.702 ↗
26. Rastegar A. · 1990
27. 10.1002/anie.20181094510.1002/anie.201810945 ↗
28. 10.18203/2349-2902.isj2016116510.18203/2349-2902.isj20161165 ↗
29. 10.1136/gut.29.8.103510.1136/gut.29.8.1035 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20140073110.1002/adma.201400731 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.487853910.1063/1.4878539 ↗
32. 10.1002/aelm.20190107910.1002/aelm.201901079 ↗