journal article·2025-08-12Open access

Direct PEALD Deposition of a HfO2 Gate Dielectric without the Passivation for TFTs on Rigid and Flexible Substrates

Amit Tewari, Antti Tukiainen, Matti Mäntysalo, Paul R. Berger

ACS Applied Electronic Materials· Volume 7· Issue 15

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Although hafnium oxide has been widely studied for silicon CMOS and thin-film transistors (TFTs), it has typically been implemented either with a passivating layer or with nanolaminates layered with other dielectric materials to improve the performance of these TFTs. Eliminating postdeposition passivation steps simplifies the fabrication process, potentially reducing manufacturing costs, enhancing throughput, and increasing compatibility with soft substrates. In this work, we have investigated the quality of HfO 2 film deposited at four sets of substrate temperatures on silicon via plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) without any postdeposition annealing. The materials characterization of these as-deposited films was investigated via grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), confirming the best quality of film at a substrate temperature of 200 °C. Meanwhile, the resulting 50 nm thick HfO 2 gate dielectric exhibited a ∼ 382 nF/cm 2 zero-bias capacitance at 1 kHz and an estimated high dielectric constant value of 22 as extracted from the MOSCAP (Si/HfO 2 /Al) device. Furthermore, the same method was employed to deposit HfO 2 films on glass and polyimide substrates along with Si, followed by the solution-processed In 2 O 3 film as a semiconductor and Al deposition atop as a source/drain electrode to fabricate TFTs on all three substrates. The figure of merit (FOM) parameters including threshold voltage ( V th ), subthreshold slope (SS), saturation mobility (μ sat ), and trap density ( N eff ) were extracted in each case, and their reliability was examined on multiple devices in each case. Preliminary results demonstrate the potential of the as-deposited HfO 2 with a limited thermal budget to achieve acceptable device performance in flexible TFTs, highlighting a promising pathway for the streamlined fabrication of next-generation flexible electronics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Future Electronics (LFE) Tampere University Tampere

Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences

Tampere University

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Ohio State University Colombus

Funding

Research Council of Finland

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s44287-025-00174-610.1038/s44287-025-00174-6 ↗
2. 10.1039/D4GC05504G10.1039/D4GC05504G ↗
3. Jeon, S.P.; Jo, J.W.; Nam, D.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, S. K.High-Performance Metal Oxide TFTs for Flexible Displays: Materials, Fabrication, Architecture, and Applications Soft Science 2025; Vol. 5 113910.20517/ss.2024.35.10.20517/ss.2024.35 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20221376210.1002/adfm.202213762 ↗
5. 10.1002/admt.20240066110.1002/admt.202400661 ↗
6. 10.1080/15583724.2018.147342410.1080/15583724.2018.1473424 ↗
7. 10.1002/admt.20210077310.1002/admt.202100773 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0004510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00045 ↗
9. 10.1021/cr900127510.1021/cr9001275 ↗
10. 10.1021/ar400226210.1021/ar4002262 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2024.12759410.1016/j.polymer.2024.127594 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11596410.1016/j.mseb.2022.115964 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.200537010.1063/1.2005370 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.11342410.1016/j.optmat.2022.113424 ↗
15. 10.1116/6.000131710.1116/6.0001317 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598-019-46443-x10.1038/s41598-019-46443-x ↗
17. 10.1007/s10854-022-07975-710.1007/s10854-022-07975-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.22210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.222 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00291-010.1016/S0167-9317(03)00291-0 ↗
20. 10.1007/s40820-022-00929-y10.1007/s40820-022-00929-y ↗
21. 10.1063/1.502208810.1063/1.5022088 ↗
22. 10.1002/aelm.20240003610.1002/aelm.202400036 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.05.01110.1016/j.orgel.2011.05.011 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10854-021-07662-z10.1007/s10854-021-07662-z ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.05610.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.056 ↗
26. 10.1002/aelm.20190012510.1002/aelm.201900125 ↗
27. 10.1063/5.024011010.1063/5.0240110 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsaelm.4c0169010.1021/acsaelm.4c01690 ↗
29. 10.1007/s42341-020-00202-210.1007/s42341-020-00202-2 ↗
30. 10.3390/ma1309200810.3390/ma13092008 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.11210.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.112 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.optmat.2014.08.00510.1016/j.optmat.2014.08.005 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.1c2188910.1021/acsami.1c21889 ↗
34. 10.3390/nano1221389010.3390/nano12213890 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10854-016-4663-610.1007/s10854-016-4663-6 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.02.03410.1016/j.matlet.2012.02.034 ↗
37. 10.1186/s11671-015-0757-y10.1186/s11671-015-0757-y ↗
38. 10.1063/1.486698810.1063/1.4866988 ↗
39. 10.1002/sia.74016016310.1002/sia.740160163 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.9b0709010.1021/acsami.9b07090 ↗
41. 10.1149/1.178482110.1149/1.1784821 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.06110.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.061 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.238712610.1063/1.2387126 ↗
44. 10.3390/coatings1111135210.3390/coatings11111352 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.physb.2020.41206510.1016/j.physb.2020.412065 ↗
46. Loke, A. L. S.; Wu, Z.Y.; Moallemi, R.; Cabler, C. D.; Lackey, C. O.; Doyle, B. A. Synopsys Users Group (SNUG). 2010 www.globalfoundries.com.
47. 10.1063/1.493030510.1063/1.4930305 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.orgel.2023.10684410.1016/j.orgel.2023.106844 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.03533410.1103/PhysRevB.78.035334 ↗
50. Streetman, B. G.; Sanjay; Banerjee, K. Global Edition Solid State Electronic Devices Seventh Edition. 2016 https://rrsdce.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/sspd-eee-swapnil.pdf (accessed 2025–06–16).
51. 10.1109/TED.2021.305322910.1109/TED.2021.3053229 ↗