journal article·2020-09

Electronic and mechanical properties of silicene after nuclear transmutation doping with phosphorus

Alexander Y. Galashev, Alexey S. Vorob’ev

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

The present work is aimed at studying the changes in the electronic and mechanical properties of silicene as a result of its doping with phosphorus. It is proposed to use modified silicene as the material of the anode of a lithium-ion battery. The performed first-principle calculations of the density spectrum of electronic states show that silicene on a graphite substrate after neutron transmutation doping is converted from a narrow-gap semiconductor into a material having metallic conductivity. The influence of the composition of the alloyed material on adhesion energy and the possible types of binding energy is investigated. The molecular dynamics method was used to study the intercalation of lithium in doped silicene channel located on a modified graphite substrate. The straightening of corrugated silicene using alloying can significantly increase the capacity for filling the modified channel with lithium. Despite a more than twofold increase in channel volume during lithization, it retains strength and high capacity if the phosphorus content in silicene does not exceed 6%. In this case, the stresses arising in the walls of the channel from doped silicene are not critical.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Jain V, Kandasubramanian B (2020) Functionalized graphene materials for hydrogen storage. J Mater Sci 55:1865–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04150-y10.1007/s10853-019-04150-y ↗
2. Wang X, Shi Z, Meng F, Zhao Y, Wu Z, Lei Y, Xue L (2020) Interfacial interaction-induced temperature-dependent mechanical property of graphene-PDMS nanocomposite. J Mater Sci 55:1553–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04126-y10.1007/s10853-019-04126-y ↗
3. Wu Y, Mu H, Cao X, He X (2020) Polymer-supported graphene–TiO2 doped with nonmetallic elements with enhanced photocatalytic reaction under visible light. J Mater Sci 55:1577–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04100-810.1007/s10853-019-04100-8 ↗
4. Luo J, Gao T, Li L, Xie Q, Tian Z, Chen Q, Liang Y (2019) Formation of defects during fullerene bombardment and repair of vacancy defects in graphene. J Mater Sci 54:14431–14439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03938-210.1007/s10853-019-03938-2 ↗
5. Kovalev AI, Wainstein DL, Tetelbaum DI, Hornig W, Kucherehko YN (2004) Investigation of the electronic structure of the phosphorus-doped Si and SiO2: Si quantum dots by XPS and HREELS methods. Surf Interface Anal 36:959–96210.1002/sia.1811 ↗
6. Fujii M, Toshikiyo K, Takase Y, Yamaguchi Y, Hayashi S (2003) Below bulk-band-gap photoluminescence at room temperature from heavily P- and B-doped Si nanocrystals. J Appl Phys 94:1990–199510.1063/1.1590409 ↗
7. Kane BE (1998) A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer. Nature 393:133–13710.1038/30156 ↗
8. Debernardi A, Baldereschi A, Fanciulli M (2006) Computation of the Stark effect in P impurity states in silicon. Phys Rev B 74:03520210.1103/PhysRevB.74.035202 ↗
9. Fujii M, Mimura A, Hayashi S (2002) Hyperfine structure of the electron spin resonance of phosphorus-doped Si nanocrystals. Phys Rev Lett 89:296805–29680910.1103/PhysRevLett.89.206805 ↗
10. Chen Q, Wang J, Zhang Y (2016) Activation energy study of phosphorus-doped microcrystalline silicon thin films. Optic 127:10437–10441
11. Galashev AY, Ivanichkina KA (2018) Computer study of atomic mechanisms of intercalation/deintercalation of Li ions in a silicene anode on an Ag (111) substrate. J Electrochem Soc 165:A1788–A179610.1149/2.0751809jes ↗
12. Galashev AY, Ivanichkina KA (2019) Computer test of a new silicene anode for lithium-ion battery. ChemElectroChem 6:1525–153510.1002/celc.201900119 ↗
13. Galashev AY, Ivanichkina KA (2019) Computional investigation of a promising Si-Cu anode material. PCCP 21:12310–1232010.1039/C9CP01571J ↗
14. Galashev AY, Zaikov YuP (2019) New Si–Cu and Si–Ni anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J Appl Electrochem 49:1027–103410.1007/s10800-019-01344-9 ↗
15. Galashev AE, Ivanichkina KA (2019) Numerical simulation of the structure and mechanical properties of silicene layers on graphite during the lithium ion motion. Phys Solid State 61:233–24310.1134/S1063783419020136 ↗
16. Galashev AE, Ivanichkina KA (2019) Computer modeling of lithium intercalation and deintercalation in a silicene channel. Russ J Phys Chem A 93:765–76910.1134/S0036024419040137 ↗
17. Galashev AE, Vorob’ev AS (2018) Physical properties of silicene electrodes for Li-, Na-, Mg-, and K-ion batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 22:3383–339110.1007/s10008-018-4050-8 ↗
18. Roman R, Cranford SW (2014) Mechanical properties of silicene. Comput Mater Sci 82:50–5510.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.030 ↗
19. Chung J-Y, Sorkin V, Pei Q-X, Chiu C-H, Zhang Y-W (2017) Mechanical properties and failure behaviour of graphene/silicene/graphene heterostructures. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:34530210.1088/1361-6463/aa7938 ↗
20. Galashev AE, Rakhmanova OR, Ivanichkina KA (2018) Graphene and graphite supports for silicone stabilization: a computer study. J Struct Chem 59:877–88310.1134/S0022476618040194 ↗
21. Galashev AE, Ivanichkina KA (2017) Nanoscale simulation of the lithium ion interaction with defective silicene. Phys Lett A 381:3079–308310.1016/j.physleta.2017.07.040 ↗
22. Galashev AE, Ivanichkina KA, Vorob’ev AS, Rakhmanova OR (2017) Structure and stability of defective silicene on Ag(001) and Ag(111) substrates: a computer experiment. Phys Solid State 59:1242–125210.1134/S1063783417060087 ↗
23. Rakhmanova OR, Galashev AE (2017) Motion of a lithium ion over a graphene–silicene channel: a computer model. Russ J Phys Chem A 91:921–92510.1134/S003602441705020X ↗
24. Tsoutsou D, Xenogiannopoulou E, Golias E, Tsipas P, Dimoulas A (2013) Evidence for hybrid surface metallic band in (4 × 4) silicene on Ag(111). Appl Phys Lett 103:23160410.1063/1.4841335 ↗
25. Meng L, Wang Y, Zhang L, Du S, Wu R, Li L, Zhang Y, Li G et al (2013) Buckled silicene formation on Ir(111). Nano Lett 13:685–69010.1021/nl304347w ↗
26. Stpniak-Dybala A, Dyniec P, Kopciuszyski M, Zdyb R, Jałochowski M, Krawiec M (2019) Planar silicene: A new silicon allotrope epitaxially grown by segregation. Adv Funct Mater 29:190605310.1002/adfm.201906053 ↗
27. Cai Y, Chuu CP, Wei CM, Chou MY (2013) Stability and electronic properties of two-dimensional silicene and germanene on graphene. Phys Rev B 88:24540810.1103/PhysRevB.88.245408 ↗
28. Houssa M, Dimoulas A, Molle A (2015) Silicene: a review of recent experimental and theoretical investigations. J Phys Condens Matter 25:25300210.1088/0953-8984/27/25/253002 ↗
29. De Crescenzi M, Berbezier I, Scarselli M, Castrucci P, Abbarchi M, Ronda A, Jardali F, Park J, Vach H (2016) Formation of silicene nanosheets on graphite. ACS Nano 10:11163–1117110.1021/acsnano.6b06198 ↗
30. An Y, Hou Y, Gong S, Wu R, Zhao C, Wang T, Jiao Z, Wang H, Liu W (2020) Evaluating the exfoliation of two-dimensional materials with a Green’s function surface model. Phys Rev B 101:07541610.1103/PhysRevB.101.075416 ↗
31. Podsiadly-Paszkowska A, Krawiec AM (2015) Silicene on metallic quantum wells: An efficient way of tuning silicene-substrate interaction. Phys Rev B 92:16541110.1103/PhysRevB.92.165411 ↗
32. Zeng Z, Ma X, Chen J, Zeng Y, Yang D, Liu Y (2010) Effects of heavy phosphorous-doping on mechanical properties of Czochralski silicon. J Appl Phys 107:12350310.1063/1.3436599 ↗
33. Okamoto S, Ito A (2012) Investigation of mechanical properties of nitrogen-containing graphene using molecular dynamics simulations, Proceeding of the international multy conference of engineers and computer scientists, vol 1. IMECS, Hong Kong
34. Solera JM, Artacho E, Gale JD, García A, Junquera J, Ordejon P, Sanchez-Portal D (2002) The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J Phys Condens Matter 14(11):2745–277910.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
35. Hu W, Li Z, Yang J (2013) Structural, electronic, and optical properties of hybrid silicene and graphene nanocomposite. J Chem Phys 139:15470410.1063/1.4824887 ↗
36. Joo Y, Kim M, Kanimozhi C, Huang P, Wong BM, Roy SS, Arnold MS, Gopalan P (2016) Effect of dipolar molecule structure on the mechanism of graphene-enhanced Raman scattering. J Phys Chem C 120(25):13815–1382410.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04098 ↗
37. Huang C, Kim M, Wong BM, Safron NS, Arnold MS, Gopalan P (2014) Raman enhancement of a dipolar molecule on graphene. J Phys Chem C 118(4):2077–208410.1021/jp410749a ↗
38. Dion M, Rydberg H, Schroder E, Langreth DC, Lundqvist BI (2004) Van der Waals density functional for general geometries. Phys Rev Lett 92:24640110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.246401 ↗
39. Galashev AY (2015) Computer study of the removal of Cu from the graphene surface using Ar clusters. Comp Mater Sci 98:123–12810.1016/j.commatsci.2014.11.002 ↗
40. Bin Hamid MA, Tim CK, Bin Yaakob Y, Bin Hazan MA (2019) Structural, electronic and transport properties of silicene on graphene substrate. Mater Res Exp 6(5):05580310.1088/2053-1591/ab01ea ↗
41. Zhou R, Lew Yan Voon LC, Zhuang Y (2013) Properties of two-dimensional silicon grown on graphene substrate. J Appl Phys 114:09371110.1063/1.4820473 ↗
42. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
43. Marjaoui A, Stephan R, Hanf M-C, Diani M, Sonnet P (2017) Using strain to control molecule chemisorption on silicene. J Chem Phys 147:04470510.1063/1.4995438 ↗