journal article·2023-06-27Open access

Impact of an Underlying 2DEG on the Performance of a p-Channel MOSFET in GaN

Jinggui Zhou, Huy-Binh Do, Maria Merlyne De Souza

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The influence of an underlying 2-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) on the performance of a normally off p-type metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) based on GaN/AlGaN/GaN double heterojunction is analyzed via simulations. By reducing the concentration of the 2DEG, a greater potential can be dropped across the GaN channel, resulting in enhanced electrostatic control. Therefore, to minimize the deleterious impact on the on-state performance, a composite graded back-to-back AlGaN barrier that enables a trade-off between n-channel devices and Enhancement-mode (E-mode) p-channel is investigated. In simulations, a scaled p-channel GaN device with L G = 200 nm, L SD = 600 nm achieves an I ON of 65 mA/mm, an increase of 44.4% compared to a device with an AlGaN barrier with fixed Al mole fraction, I ON / I OFF of ∼10 12, and | V th | of | – 1.3 V|. For the n-channel device, the back-to-back barrier overcomes the reduction of I ON induced by the p-GaN gate resulting in an I ON of 860 mA/mm, an increase of 19.7% compared with the counterpart with the conventional barrier with 0.5 V positive V th shift.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor materials and devices · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Sheffield-Mappin Street, S1 3JD Sheffield, U.K.

Department of Materials Technology, HCMC University of Technology and Education, 700000 Hochiminh, Vietnam

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TED.2017.265757910.1109/TED.2017.2657579 ↗
2. 10.1109/TED.2013.226857710.1109/TED.2013.2268577 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf9d10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf9d ↗
4. 10.1109/LED.2016.251510310.1109/LED.2016.2515103 ↗
5. 10.1109/LED.2004.83028510.1109/LED.2004.830285 ↗
6. 10.1109/TED.2013.227233010.1109/TED.2013.2272330 ↗
7. 10.1049/iet-pel.2017.037610.1049/iet-pel.2017.0376 ↗
8. 10.1109/LED.2013.226431110.1109/LED.2013.2264311 ↗
9. 10.1088/0022-3727/47/17/17510310.1088/0022-3727/47/17/175103 ↗
10. Hahn H. · 2014 · 25910.1109/DRC.2014.6872396 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.487224210.1063/1.4872242 ↗
12. Chowdhury N. · 2019 · 4.6.1
13. 10.1109/LED.2020.298700310.1109/LED.2020.2987003 ↗
14. 10.1109/TED.2021.312626710.1109/TED.2021.3126267 ↗
15. 10.1109/LED.2020.303926410.1109/LED.2020.3039264 ↗
16. 10.1109/LED.2019.295403510.1109/LED.2019.2954035 ↗
17. Zheng Z. · 2020 · 2020 · 525
18. 10.1063/5.008695410.1063/5.0086954 ↗
19. 10.1109/LED.2022.315515210.1109/LED.2022.3155152 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41928-021-00611-y10.1038/s41928-021-00611-y ↗
21. 10.1109/LED.2022.314965910.1109/LED.2022.3149659 ↗
22. Bader S. J. · 2019 · 51 · 4.5.110.1109/IEDM19573.2019.8993532 ↗
23. Bader S. J. · IEEE Electron. Device Lett. · 2018 · 1
24. Nomoto K. · 2020 · 2020 · 8.3.110.1109/IEDM13553.2020.9371994 ↗
25. 10.1088/1361-6641/abe5fd10.1088/1361-6641/abe5fd ↗
26. 10.1063/5.012119510.1063/5.0121195 ↗
27. 10.1109/LED.2022.314028110.1109/LED.2022.3140281 ↗
28. Xie Q. · 2022 · 35.3.110.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019401 ↗
29. 10.1109/LED.2022.318329310.1109/LED.2022.3183293 ↗
30. 10.1088/1361-6633/abde9310.1088/1361-6633/abde93 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.490644910.1063/1.4906449 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.494394610.1063/1.4943946 ↗
33. 10.1063/5.006135410.1063/5.0061354 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.7b1916010.1021/acsami.7b19160 ↗
35. Zhou J. · 2023 · 1